Connect with us


Whistleblower exposes practices in gender-affirming hospitals for children



Screen Shot 2022 08 29 at 10.16.33 PM

Jaime Reed, a previous case manager at a transgender medical center spoke out and blew the whistle on medical procedures occurring at gender-affirming hospitals for children. Reed spoke to Fox News and revealed key details on gender-affirming medical procedures occurring at these hospitals.

Reed describes herself as a far-left queer woman. She is a native of St. Louis and underwent a double mastectomy at the age of 18. Only three months later, Reed had changed her mind and said, “I want my breasts back” to the surgeons office where she had the procedure done. Reed described the journey through her gender-affirming surgery as “harrowing” stating that she still has problems today with some of the side-effects of the surgery she received.

A new Utah law on transgender treatments for minors was implemented and “bans all sex change surgeries for anyone under the age of 18, and will prohibit hormone therapy/puberty blockers without a formal gender dysphoria diagnosis,” according to reports.  “Morally and medically appalling” is how Reed described the gender clinics. Utah is the third state banning surgeries for minors with Texas and Florida already having those bans set in place.

For four years Reed worked in the infectious disease division at the University of Washington. She helped teens and young adults that were HIV-positive. This led her to finding work at the transgender center of the children’s hospital, according to Fox News.

Most young people who walked into the center she worked at were going there for hormone prescription which can cause sterility and other life-changing consequences.

“By the time I departed, I was certain that the way the American medical system is treating these patients is the opposite of the promise we make to ‘do no harm.’ Instead, we are permanently harming the vulnerable patients in our care,” she wrote.

Reed said there is a “4,000% increase in trans-identifying youth in America,” she noted,”the numbers just don’t add up,” describing it as a “social contagion.”

Reed hopes that even if permanent bans are not set in place by more states in the US that at least temporary bans will be amended giving minors more time to find effective help and therapy before making a life-altering decision.



Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Stephen Leonard

    February 9, 2023 at 5:34 pm

    Sara, you’re a national treasure, but like all responsible, sane people you should avoid using the ridiculous term “gender-affirming” care. The Left uses their perversion of language as a political weapon, from labeling anything they disagree with as a “-phobia” to inventing phrases like “white fragility” Calling sex-change treatment “gender-affirming care” when it is, in fact, biology-destroying mutilation is a particularly egregious example.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Is the FBI ‘purging’ agents with Conservative views?




On Thursday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan formally requested that the Justice Department’s Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, open an investigation into the FBI’s alleged use of political litmus tests to sideline or remove agents and employees with conservative viewpoints. This request also included a direct warning to FBI Director Christopher Wray about these practices.

Jordan’s action follows a report by Just the News detailing how an FBI security clearance review involved inquiries about an employee’s political beliefs. Specifically, the review asked whether the employee had expressed support for former President Donald Trump, attended a Second Amendment rally, or voiced skepticism about COVID-19 vaccines.

In a letter to Director Wray, Jordan expressed wrote, “The FBI appears to be purging itself of employees who do not share its preferred political views.” He emphasized the troubling nature of these practices, especially when they impinge on fundamental liberties and constitutional rights.

Speaking on the “John Solomon Reports” podcast, Jordan highlighted the severity of the situation: “Particularly when they’re asking about fundamental liberties, your constitutional rights, I mean, that is that is frightening stuff.” He further noted the retaliatory actions taken against whistleblowers who bring such issues to light, adding, “You put all that together, and you talk about politics driving what happens there.”

Jordan’s inquiry into the political weaponization of law enforcement has been ongoing, with a particular focus on the FBI’s conduct. In his communication with Inspector General Horowitz, Jordan underscored that the targeting of an employee’s political beliefs and First Amendment activities was deeply concerning and seemingly unrelated to legitimate security risk assessments. “These actions only serve to further erode the dwindling public trust in the FBI and reinforce the Committee and Select Subcommittee’s concerns about political bias within the FBI,” he wrote.

Jordan also referenced evidence uncovered by Judicial Watch, which suggested political retaliation against FBI whistleblowers aiding Congress. He pointed out that an FBI official allegedly disclosed nonpublic information about these whistleblowers to a Democrat member of the Select Subcommittee, ostensibly to discredit their testimonies about FBI misconduct. “It appears from the documents that the FBI sought to selectively disclose this nonpublic information so that it would be used to impugn the credibility of the whistleblowers,” Jordan stated.

In his separate letter to Wray, Jordan questioned the relevance of political viewpoints to security clearance determinations. He argued that while assessing the legality of employees’ actions is legitimate, questions about political beliefs are “completely irrelevant to any legitimate security risk determination” and infringe upon First Amendment rights.

Following the release of internal FBI memos showing that bureau officials had inquired about an employee’s support for Trump, stance on COVID-19 vaccines, and participation in a Second Amendment rally, concerns about political bias have intensified. These memos indicated that the employee’s security clearance was revoked months after confirming his conservative views and vaccine skepticism.

Tristan Leavitt, the lawyer representing the affected FBI employee, commended the congressional oversight, stating, “It’s good to see Congress holding the FBI’s feet to the fire.” He emphasized the need for a thorough investigation into how these questions were used to justify purging conservative employees from the FBI.

 Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton echoed this sentiment on the “Just the News, No Noise” TV show, predicting that the FBI would attempt to deflect criticism despite clear evidence of misconduct. “I’m sure we’ll get some distraction and noise from Chris Wray and a reaffirmation that the FBI never does anything wrong, even when it’s caught red-handed,” Fitton remarked.

Continue Reading