Connect with us

Immigration

VP Harris: Effects of working on immigration ‘root causes’ won’t be seen ‘overnight’ as crisis surges

Published

on

Screen Shot 2021 10 12 at 3.39.39 PM

Vice President Kamala Harris has once again displayed her total delusions when it comes to our immigration crisis. Rarely does she speak about the matter, despite being tasked last year with leading the administration’s diplomatic outreach as a means to attend and combat the migrant crisis.

When she does speak, however, she compounds the problem. In an interview with Telemundo about the administration’s strategy, she warned the effects would not be seen “overnight.” But the effects are being seen overnight, and with each night, the crisis worsens.

In a nonsensical discussion, Harris said, “I believe very strongly most people don’t want to leave home. They don’t want to leave the place where they grew up, the church where they worship They don’t want to leave their grandmother. And when people leave home, it’s usually for one of two reasons: either they are fleeing harm, or they cannot simply stay and take care of the basic needs of themselves and their families. So I am approaching our root causes work with that spirit.”

“Root causes” and “spirit.” What empty words. With regard to her “root causes” she defended her strategy by pointing to 77 CEOs who have pledged $1.2 billion to invest in agriculture and women entrepreneurs in the region.

She said she is “very clear” with leaders in the region “that one of our highest priorities is to combat corruption.” She said “if there is going to be American investment, this is a factor of either something that discourages investment or will encourage investment, meaning combating corruption.”

To make sure she cannot be held accountable for the fact that there is absolute inaction and zero progress, she conveniently adds, “but none of this is going to be just turning on a switch. It requires focus, it requires intention, it requires an investment over a period of time, which means, in the short point, is that you’re not going to see the benefit of it overnight – because the problems didn’t occur overnight.”

She says “it” so many times but fails to explain what the heck “it” is. Whatever, “it” is, she explains has seen success in that they have expanded “the ability of people in the region to have access to high-speed internet….so we are seeing progress.”

Continue Reading
4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Slideglide

    February 4, 2022 at 5:08 pm

    ♥️♥️♥️♥️

    I guess Kamala is writing off the causes of illegal immagration for the last 60 years, and will have it all figured out by 2024, after 8 miilion more have crossed the border.

  2. Gary

    February 4, 2022 at 5:20 pm

    Good to know. Come back when you’ve got it all figured and solved.

  3. REX DIETRICK

    February 5, 2022 at 7:02 pm

    How did this moron get her law license?

  4. Ted Jordan

    February 5, 2022 at 8:52 pm

    What a dipshit!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Immigration

BREAKING: Senate votes down both articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in party-line vote

Published

on

Mayorkas

The Senate voted down two articles of impeachment Wednesday which alleged Department of Homeland Security Secretary  Alejandro Mayorkas engaged in the “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” regarding the southern border in his capacity as DHS secretary. The second claimed Mayorkas had breached public trust.

What resulted in a party-line vote, began with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., proposing a point of order declaring the first article unconstitutional, to which the majority of senators agreed following several failed motions by Republicans. The article was deemed unconstitutional by a vote of 51-48, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting present.

Fox News reports:

Schumer’s point of order was proposed after his request for unanimous consent, which would have provided a set amount of time for debate among the senators, as well as votes on two GOP resolutions and a set amount of agreed upon points of order, was objected to by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

Schmitt stated in his objection that the Senate should conduct a full trial into the impeachment articles against Mayorkas, rather than the debate and points of order suggested by Schumer’s unanimous consent request, which would be followed by a likely successful motion to dismiss the articles. 

Republican senators took issue with Schumer’s point of order, as agreeing to it would effectively kill the first of the two articles. Several GOP lawmakers proposed motions, which took precedence over the point of order, to adjourn or table the point, among other things. But all GOP motions failed. 

After another batch of motions to avoid voting on Schumer’s second point of order, which would deem the second article unconstitutional, the Senate agreed to it. The vote was along party lines 51-49, with Murkowski rejoining the Republicans. 

Continue Reading

Trending