Connect with us

Nation

VA Skirt Wearing High-School Boy Who Sexually Assaulted 2 Females Speaks Out, Defends Son

The mother chastised the victim saying, “you’re fifteen. You can reasonably defend yourself”

Published

on

Broad Run High School

The mother of the Virginia high school student who sexually molested teenage girls not once, but twice, in two different high schools, granted an interview with the Daily Mail. The male student and mother have yet to be publicly identified, but the boy was wearing a skirt when he sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in a non-binary bathroom in a proud “woke” school district.

Defending her son relentlessly, the mother chastised the victim saying, “you’re fifteen. You can reasonably defend yourself.” She also said her son simply is a 15-year-old boy who “wanted sex.” A local judge found him guilty of the sexual assault that occurred in May.

“He’s a 15-year-old boy that wanted to have sex in the bathroom, with somebody that was willing,” said the mother. “And they’re twisting this just enough to make it a political hot button issue.” As for wearing a skirt during the assault, the woman did admit her son is “deeply troubled” but was only wearing a skirt that particular day because he has an “androgynous style.”

The mother continued, “he would wear a skirt one day and then the next day, he would wear jeans and a T-shirt, a polo, or hoodie. He was trying to find himself and that involved all kinds of styles. I believe he was doing it because it gave him the attention he desperately needed and sought.”

Despite two alleged attacks by her son, the mother claims it was all a misunderstanding. At least the first assault. According to how the son described the scenario to her, his mother said the two had met earlier in the day because the female “wasn’t feeling well that day….he was worried about her, asked her how she was feeling, touched her forehead, brought water for her.”

She says the two students discussed having sex later on in the day. “He’d mentioned something about hooking up with her, said they’d discussed it that day and that she was wishy-washy, was like, ‘Yeah, maybe, I still don’t feel well, we’ll see.” She said her son told her later in the day when the girl was feeling “much better” they met to have sex.

The mother claims that the rape was an “accident” because he did not mean to insert himself into her anus. The mother then brought into question the female student’s account of the attack. “If I was in a position where I was about to be raped, I would be screaming, kicking, everything…you’re 15. You can reasonably defend yourself. You’re not just going to sit there and take it. And so, because there wasn’t a presence of a fight, he felt it was okay to keep going.”

Continue Reading
20 Comments

20 Comments

  1. Founders Fan

    November 5, 2021 at 1:11 pm

    I really hate misleading headlines. The headline says the perp speaks out but it was his mommy.

  2. ClayMD

    November 5, 2021 at 1:11 pm

    What the h3ll kinda parent are you?

    • Mailyn Ledbetter

      November 6, 2021 at 5:41 pm

      As a teen rape victim myself in the 70’s, I would like to meet this mother alone. She’s a grown ass women I’m sure she can defend herself.

  3. markenpet

    November 5, 2021 at 1:18 pm

    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. Michael Bailey

    November 5, 2021 at 1:29 pm

    Raises a lot of questions in today’s world. The girl was not harmed. And could have resisted. Yep, the confused male is a freak. Encouraged by the wokeness

    • RoberT

      November 14, 2021 at 2:56 am

      S/he/it (say it quickly!) is not only a rapist but a sodomizer. S/he/it coerced/forced the poor girl to submit to anal penetration and to fellate hir.

  5. Anne B Vachalek

    November 5, 2021 at 3:20 pm

    Pretty clear,the problem here. Very sad. Blame a 15 yo girl,don’t teach our son. It is so much easier. Pathetic .

  6. Duane Mo tez

    November 5, 2021 at 8:47 pm

    Can we try the RETROACTIVE BIRTH CONTROL Experiment on this Nasty Family?

  7. Douglas Perkins

    November 5, 2021 at 9:08 pm

    There is no excuse for rape….Period.

  8. David Odam

    November 5, 2021 at 10:53 pm

    Jeez, sounds like mom would find a reason to blame victims had her “troubled” son Columbined his entire school. She’d be like…”high schoolers are old enough to matrix themselves and avoid the high velocity ammunition being expelled from my boys gun. He is a 15 year old who just wanted to splatter his classmates brain matter across the blackboard!” If she happens to be responsible for any other minors I hope CPS has interjected.

    • Biff Baxter

      November 7, 2021 at 10:42 am

      And his father is where, exactly?

      • RoberT

        November 14, 2021 at 3:01 am

        He woke up and found himself with a hangover, lying next to this nasty b***h. She said, “You’re a grown man. You could have fought me off. It’s your fault.”
        So he gets 18 years of child support payments but considers it well worth not living with the b***.”

  9. AK

    November 7, 2021 at 4:18 am

    Can someone please ‘splain tome whateveah happened to #believeallwomen and #metoo? Not to mention #timesup?

    • Drew S

      November 15, 2021 at 4:03 am

      Tara Reid, killed the #MeToo movement, when she accused Creepy Joe Biden of unwanted touching, and then the media went completely silent on the #MeToo thing

  10. Richard L Martin

    November 7, 2021 at 4:39 pm

    Looks to me like both mother and son need put in prison. What fools.

  11. Clyde Allen Hall

    November 7, 2021 at 6:32 pm

    It sounds like the mother’s attitude is “All girls want it” which is the excuse every rapist uses to justify their actions time and time again The boy needs his penis removed so there will be no more “accidents.”

    • RoberT

      November 14, 2021 at 3:04 am

      The gestator person would suggest that the girls all wear buttplugs and gags.

  12. June Handrow

    November 7, 2021 at 7:58 pm

    Well, you can certainly see why this kid is a mess with a Mom like that!

  13. SFC MAC

    November 9, 2021 at 10:41 am

    When you look at his mother, you see where he got his behavior.

  14. Garion60

    November 9, 2021 at 4:00 pm

    This is a perfect explanation as to why God made baseball bats…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nation

Is the FBI ‘purging’ agents with Conservative views?

Published

on

FBI

On Thursday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan formally requested that the Justice Department’s Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, open an investigation into the FBI’s alleged use of political litmus tests to sideline or remove agents and employees with conservative viewpoints. This request also included a direct warning to FBI Director Christopher Wray about these practices.

Jordan’s action follows a report by Just the News detailing how an FBI security clearance review involved inquiries about an employee’s political beliefs. Specifically, the review asked whether the employee had expressed support for former President Donald Trump, attended a Second Amendment rally, or voiced skepticism about COVID-19 vaccines.

In a letter to Director Wray, Jordan expressed wrote, “The FBI appears to be purging itself of employees who do not share its preferred political views.” He emphasized the troubling nature of these practices, especially when they impinge on fundamental liberties and constitutional rights.

Speaking on the “John Solomon Reports” podcast, Jordan highlighted the severity of the situation: “Particularly when they’re asking about fundamental liberties, your constitutional rights, I mean, that is that is frightening stuff.” He further noted the retaliatory actions taken against whistleblowers who bring such issues to light, adding, “You put all that together, and you talk about politics driving what happens there.”

Jordan’s inquiry into the political weaponization of law enforcement has been ongoing, with a particular focus on the FBI’s conduct. In his communication with Inspector General Horowitz, Jordan underscored that the targeting of an employee’s political beliefs and First Amendment activities was deeply concerning and seemingly unrelated to legitimate security risk assessments. “These actions only serve to further erode the dwindling public trust in the FBI and reinforce the Committee and Select Subcommittee’s concerns about political bias within the FBI,” he wrote.

Jordan also referenced evidence uncovered by Judicial Watch, which suggested political retaliation against FBI whistleblowers aiding Congress. He pointed out that an FBI official allegedly disclosed nonpublic information about these whistleblowers to a Democrat member of the Select Subcommittee, ostensibly to discredit their testimonies about FBI misconduct. “It appears from the documents that the FBI sought to selectively disclose this nonpublic information so that it would be used to impugn the credibility of the whistleblowers,” Jordan stated.

In his separate letter to Wray, Jordan questioned the relevance of political viewpoints to security clearance determinations. He argued that while assessing the legality of employees’ actions is legitimate, questions about political beliefs are “completely irrelevant to any legitimate security risk determination” and infringe upon First Amendment rights.

Following the release of internal FBI memos showing that bureau officials had inquired about an employee’s support for Trump, stance on COVID-19 vaccines, and participation in a Second Amendment rally, concerns about political bias have intensified. These memos indicated that the employee’s security clearance was revoked months after confirming his conservative views and vaccine skepticism.

Tristan Leavitt, the lawyer representing the affected FBI employee, commended the congressional oversight, stating, “It’s good to see Congress holding the FBI’s feet to the fire.” He emphasized the need for a thorough investigation into how these questions were used to justify purging conservative employees from the FBI.

 Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton echoed this sentiment on the “Just the News, No Noise” TV show, predicting that the FBI would attempt to deflect criticism despite clear evidence of misconduct. “I’m sure we’ll get some distraction and noise from Chris Wray and a reaffirmation that the FBI never does anything wrong, even when it’s caught red-handed,” Fitton remarked.

Continue Reading

Trending