Connect with us

COVID-19

UPDATE: Video of Australian Woman Shows Balcony She Cannot Leave at COVID Detention Facility

Published

on

On Friday we reported on a young Australian woman who described how she was forcibly stripped from her home and taken to a COVID detention facility. A longer clip of her interview is now circulating, which includes some cell phone video she took while at the facility.

The video shows her receiving an “official warning” that she is not allowed to leave what seems to be some type of porch balcony in front of where she is being held. The girl explained in her interview that she was forcefully held in the detention center alone for 14 days.

In the video taken from the facility, she is being warned by a man and a woman wearing full protection including rubber gloves, masks and protective eyeglasses who state “you have to stay on your balcony and obey the rules while you’re here.”

When she asks if she can go to the laundry they say only if she is wearing a mask. But other than that she is unable to cross a literal line placed on the balcony floor. “You definitely can’t go up the fencing rails,” the man tells her. She then moves the camera to show the line and the fence virtually right next to it. “It makes no sense,” she says pointing at other individuals right next to the fence as she has been instructed not to be.

“You can’t leave your balcony to go to the fence to talk to somebody else. That’s just obvious” he tells her with increasing frustration. He then attempts to act like he’s doing her a favor by issuing just a warning because her “crime” is actually deserving of a $5,000 penalty which he threatens to issue her the next time she disobeys the rules.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

China

Congressional Democrats Minimize COVID-19 Lab Leak Theory as Senate Hearing Highlights New Testimonies

Published

on

volunteers for covid 19 vaccine needed

Congressional Democrats continue to downplay the significance of COVID-19’s origin despite conclusions from the FBI and the Department of Energy suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 likely leaked from a Chinese lab. This shift comes after prominent witnesses, including those promoting new books on the talk-show circuit, have conceded that the lab-leak hypothesis is not a “conspiracy theory.”

Just The News reports that this disinterest was evident during a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on Tuesday, where Democratic attendance was notably sparse. Robert Garry, a Tulane University microbiologist and co-author of the “Proximal Origin” paper in *Nature Medicine* that initially dismissed “any type of lab-based scenario,” faced significant Republican scrutiny with little defense from Democrats.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) confronted Garry, accusing him of being central to “propaganda” allegedly mobilized by Dr. Anthony Fauci, then-director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, to “censor people who ask questions.” Exposed communications reveal that the authors of the Proximal Origin paper largely shifted their stance on the virus’s origin after consulting with Fauci and former National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins.

Garry defended his work, claiming it has withstood immense scrutiny and asserting that “new data” convinced him that COVID-19 emerged naturally. He maintained that SARS-CoV-2 is “definitely” not a “laboratory construct” and cited an unclassified summary indicating that “four IC elements” and the National Intelligence Council lean toward natural exposure.

Hawley vehemently disagreed, stating, “That is a lie. I have read” the classified assessments, while accusing Garry and his colleagues of propagandizing the public. Hawley emphasized that the intelligence community did not reach the conclusions Garry described.

The hearing saw limited participation from the Democratic majority, with only Chairman Gary Peters (D-Mich.) and Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) speaking. Peters suggested that while the lab-origin theory is “possible,” it is unlikely to be conclusively resolved due to potential non-disclosure by the Chinese government.

Garry reiterated that early COVID samples pointed to the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan as a “hotspot” for the virus, though he conceded that definitive evidence for natural emergence is lacking without raw data from China and records from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) presented exposed communications indicating that Fauci’s “inner circle” of scientists initially considered a lab escape “so friggin’ likely” based on substantial circumstantial evidence. Paul highlighted that the authors internally discussed the improbability of a natural emergence without significant genetic modifications.

Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University microbiologist, testified that the WIV had proposed risky research involving furin cleavage sites in a grant proposal to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in 2018, using only basic safety precautions. He claimed SARS-CoV-2 is the only known SARS-related coronavirus with such a furin cleavage site, which mathematically suggests a lab origin over a natural one.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) have demanded various documents and information from the SEC regarding its investigation into Hunter Biden’s business associates. This follows a pattern of Republicans seeking greater transparency and accountability in government-related investigations.

The Department of Health and Human Services has recently suspended and proposed debarment for Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled NIAID funding to the WIV. This move signals a tightening scrutiny over controversial research funding and potential conflicts of interest.

 

Continue Reading

Trending