Connect with us

Elections

BREAKING: Justice Roberts Confirms Draft of Supreme Court Ruling Leaked

Published

on

Supreme Court

UPDATE:

In a statement released on Tuesday morning, Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of a draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that would overturn the precedents set in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The draft was published by Politico on Monday night.

—-

Is nothing sacred anymore? An alleged draft of a Supreme Court ruling on the famous and controversial Roe v. Wade decision appears to have been leaked and published by POLITICO.

Releasing the document in a controversial manner of its own, POLITICO titled the piece, “Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows.” As the Associated Press reports, “Court that rarely leaks does so now in biggest case in years.”

The AP writes “Lawyers and others who watch the court closely were shocked. Neal Katyal, who has argued dozens of cases before the court and as a young lawyer worked for Justice Stephen Breyer, compared the apparent leak to The New York Times’ 1971 publication of the government’s secret history of the Vietnam War, known as the Pentagon Papers.”

“This is the equivalent of the pentagon papers leak, but at the Supreme Court. I’m pretty sure there has never ever been such a leak. And certainly not in the years I’ve been following the Supreme Court,” Katyal wrote on Twitter.

The draft published by POLITICO, appears to be a first draft of the court’s opinion delivered by Justice Samuel Alito. The opinion states: “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled…“=It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division” the opinion continues.

The draft states the discussion of abortion is not discussed within the U.S. Constitution and therefore the “issue of abortion” should be returned “to the people’s elected representatives.” It reads: “Procuring an abortion is not a fundamental constitutional right because such a right has no basis in the Constitution’s text or in our Nation’s history.”

Returning legislative powers back to the state level has liberals losing their minds. Many have  speculated as to the reason that the draft was leaked. For one, to enrage and rally the left just before the midterm elections. Another possibility is so that conservative justices could be bullied and/or publicly pressured into changing their opinion. Nonetheless, the perpetrator is disgusting.

 

You may like

Continue Reading
4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Gennaro pupa

    May 3, 2022 at 8:30 pm

    Robert’s must resign for his INCOMPETENCE as Supreme COURT JUSTICE.

  2. Alert

    May 4, 2022 at 5:20 pm

    Shouldn’t title be ‘Justice Roberts Confirms someone stole and leaked ‘Draft of Supreme Court Ruling’?. When is the leaker charged and prosecuted?

  3. Jeffmo

    May 4, 2022 at 5:21 pm

    Sara, sorry, Roberts made no reference to the authenticity of the draft in his statement.The SCOTUS press release did and the Politico piece did. Reread and correct your article.

  4. Mikie

    May 8, 2022 at 4:58 pm

    I do not believe that Judge Roberts is still on SCOTUS. This entire Leak story is fake. It makes no sense! Was Roe vs Wade up for review? On the docket? If not then why would there be anything about the case it leak? Unless its relevant. Which i do not believe it is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Elections

PJ Media report: SHOCKER! WaPo Update About Mar-A-Lago Raid Doesn’t Fit the Narrative

Published

on

Screen Shot 2022 08 09 at 6.39.11 AM

PJ Media’s Kevin Downey Jr. has dissected a Washington Post report regarding findings from the raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. “Shocker! WaPo Update About Mar-A-Lag0 Raid Doesn’t Fit the Narrative” Downey Jr.’s report is titled.

“Remember when the FBI raided Trump’s home supposedly looking for “nuclear secrets” a few months back? Guess how that turned out?” the article begins.

I’ll let the quislings at the Washinton Post spell it out:

Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter.

In other words, Trump was keeping souvenirs, as everyone else does.

Funny how WaPo sat on that story until after the midterms, right?

But wait, there’s more!

That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets. Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said.

The WaPo also found no evidence that Trump was looking to “leverage, sell or use the government secrets.”

They threw the idea in near the very end that they still might come up with something juicy:

The people familiar with the matter cautioned that the investigation is ongoing, that no final determinations have been made, and that it is possible additional information could emerge that changes investigators’ understanding of Trump’s motivations. But they said the evidence collected over a period of months indicates the primary explanation for potentially criminal conduct was Trump’s ego and intransigence.

Continue Reading: PJ Media

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending

Proudly Made In America | © 2022 M3 Media Management, LLC