Elections

Twitter wants YOU to believe universal mail-in-ballots are safe, even with evidence showing otherwise

Published

1 year ago

September 29, 2020

Staff Writer

Twitter fact-checkers don’t believe in the mounting evidence of voter fraud across the country due to issues with universal mail- in ballots,. In fact, the social media platform doesn’t even want you to question it.

President Donald Trump Tweeted out a simple statement of fact “the ballots being returned to states cannot be accurately counted. Many things are already going very wrong!”

Twitter – which is supposed to be a platform of free discourse – again acted as a publisher to fact check the President, putting a link below his Tweet in red saying “learn how voting by mail is safe and secure.”

But look at this major issue with vote-by-mail ballots in New York City – the The New York Post, Breitbart and others reported this year in the Democratic primary that 26 percent of mail in votes were disqualified (roughly 84,208 ballots.) Wow, that’s a lot of voters.

“The New York City Board of Elections disqualified 84,208 vote-by-mail ballots — 26% of the total cast — in the June 23 Democratic presidential primary, according to a report cited Wednesday evening by the New York Post.“

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1310585397630689280

Moreover, look at what is happening now in Minnesota in Rep. Ilhan Omar’s district. Project Veritas’s expose on voter fraud exposes what could potentially be criminal activity by voter harvesting. It appears based on the undercover video that people are paying for ballots – that’s a big problem, especially when you can get hundreds of universal ballots at elderly care facilities, and other similar living situations.

Imagine what will happen in the presidential election if there is massive questions over mail in ballots? Remember these are not absentee ballots, which a person makes a personal request to have mailed to their home.

Here’s a voter fraud fact sheet a former intern, Benjamin Wilson, for SaraACarter.com put together for my podcast.

Voter Fraud Fact Sheet Contradicts Twitter Censorship of Facts

According to the Heritage Foundation:1,290 proven instances of voter fraud in the country.1,113 criminal convictions relating to voter fraud.
According to U.S. Election Assistance Commission surveys, millions of mailed ballots have been misdirected or gone missing in prior elections.

Examples:

Paterson, NJ, May 12, 2020 municipal election: 13,556 votes were counted in the six ward races and 3,204 were rejected

A town over, in Haledon, a post office spokesman saw a bundle of 300 Paterson city ballots bundled in a mailbox3 there. A statement from postal inspectors said that their findings were sent to the attorney general’s office and the Board of Elections. The mayor of Paterson says the voting problems could be criminal.

Gordon, AL: Former mayor Elbert Melton was forced from office after being convicted of absentee voter fraud, he was sentenced to a year in jail in Jan. 2019, Melton’s arrest warrants say he’s accused of willfully and unlawfully falsifying absentee ballots or verification documents.

Congressional District 9, NC: An entirely new re-do election was called after voter fraud was found rampant in the original election.

A hearing before the Board of Elections declared a new election necessary after testimony was outlined how a political operative had orchestrated an absentee ballot scheme to try to sway the race5

Madera County, CA: Woman charged with 12 counts of voter fraud after she submitted several falsified voter registration cards in Madera.6

Concord, NH: A couple casted ballots in two states and were indicted for voter fraud. 7Authorities used the Interstate Voter Crosscheck Program to see the Flemings allegedly submitted absentee ballots in Hampton while also casting ballots in Belchertown, Massachusetts, during the Nov. 8, 2016, election.

Elections

Biden’s Poor Polling and Harris’ Low Electability Rating Could Have Democrats Considering ‘Nuclear Option’

Behind-the-scenes discussion of how Democrats could arrive at a third option for the next election is underway

Published

22 hours ago

December 1, 2021

Staff Writer

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

With polls consistently showing a poor approval rating for President Joe Biden at below 40 percent, and a recent poll put Kamala Harris’ electability at only 28 percent, Democrats are in full panic mode.

“Behind-the-scenes discussion of how Democrats could arrive at a third option for the next election is underway. Operatives are preparing for the possibility of a contested presidential primary in which other would-be nominees take on Ms. Harris, but that could be damaging for the party” reports the Telegraph.

Therefore, Democrats are allegedly whispering about a potential “nuclear option” that would call for current Vice President Harris to be nominated to the Supreme Court. The Telegraph writes that “while the scenario is highly improbable, and perhaps a reflection of a Washington rumor mill in overdrive, the fact it has come up at all shows the depths of the predicament the Biden administration currently finds itself in, amid rising inflation, a stalled domestic agenda, and foreign policy disasters.”

The theory in question would call for President Biden to nominate Harris to the Supreme Court in the event a seat opens in the next three years during his administration. Biden could then use “Section 2 of the 25thAmendment to nominate a more popular vice president”, adds the Telegraph.

Under Section 1 of the 25th Amendment, that new vice president could assume the presidency if Biden were to step down while president. They would then become the Democratic nominee in the 2024 presidential election. That same individual could also be the presumptive Democratic nominee in 2024 if Biden chooses not to run for re-election.

One piece of information that is wetting Democrats’ whistle is that current Supreme Court Justice Breyer has said he does not “want to stay on the Supreme Court until I die.”

The Telegraph notes that “the discussion over potential successors to Mr. Biden is highly unusual less than a year into an administration.”