Connect with us


Trump Appointed Judge Demand FDA Release Vaccine Info This Year

“The Court concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance,” the judge said.



COVID Vaccine

A federal judge appointed by former President Donald Trump destroyed the FDA’s assessment that it would take until the year 2097 to release all of the documents pertaining to the COVID-19 vaccines.

On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman, who was appointed by Trump in 2019, demanded that the FDA significantly increase its speed of releasing the documents, namely saying they had to do it by the end of the year, The Blaze reported.

“The Court concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance,” the judge said.

In his four-page order, he quoted James Madison who said in a letter to W.T. Barry in 1822, “A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps, both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

He also quoted the late President John F. Kennedy who said, “A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

Continue Reading


  1. Timothy Lynn Singleton

    January 8, 2022 at 10:12 am

    THIS government is TERRIFIED of the peoplw learning the truth/ 2097? They are wanting to guarantee that their crimes are seen as history and not answerable to current law enforcement bodies.

    …not that those bodies are worth a damn when it comes to equal protection under the law.

  2. Judy Chandler

    January 8, 2022 at 10:27 am

    WTH. We’ll all be dead by then. That’s the plan tho. Isn’t it

  3. liguide

    January 8, 2022 at 9:35 pm

    Thank you Judge. U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman,you are an honorable man

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Internal docs show Amazon censored books on vaccinations due to pressure from Biden White House




Recently released internal Amazon emails reveal the company caved to pressure from the Biden White House to suppress available vaccine information.

Provided to the House Judiciary Committee, the emails light on the extent of the Biden White House’s influence over the retail giant regarding vaccine-related content. The emails disclose a concerning narrative of pressure from government officials to suppress information deemed unfavorable to their agenda.

Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio took to Twitter to disclose the findings, stating that the emails reveal direct pressure from the White House on Amazon to censor books expressing views contrary to those endorsed by the administration. One email, albeit redacted, explicitly poses the question of whether the administration requested the removal of certain books, to which the answer was affirmative.

National Review highlights the successful efforts of the Biden administration in persuading Amazon to limit the visibility of titles skeptical of vaccine efficacy. White House senior adviser for Covid-19 response, Andrew Slavitt, expressed concerns about Amazon’s role in propagating what he termed as “misinformation” regarding vaccines. His emails illustrate a push for action to address what he perceived as a proliferation of dissenting views.

In response to Slavitt’s inquiries, Amazon initially hesitated to take overt action, fearing backlash from conservative media outlets. The company’s internal deliberations reflect a concern for public perception and the potential amplification of the issue if intervention were too conspicuous.

Despite initially refraining from manual intervention, Amazon eventually succumbed to pressure, engaging in discussions with White House officials. The company’s internal documents reveal deliberations on whether the administration sought outright book bans or alterations to search results. Amazon’s stance, as expressed in their meeting with the White House, emphasized the provision of diverse viewpoints and the distinction between online retail and social media platforms.



Continue Reading