Connect with us

Immigration

‘They are liars!’ Border Patrol respond to White House claims that border is secure

Published

on

sara carter border

Speaking at the Aspen Security Forum, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas claimed that the U.S. Southern Border was secure and that the department would be working to ensure its security, describing it as a “historic challenge.”

So historic, in fact, that it’s simply not true. “Mayorkas then blamed lawmakers who stated they would not commit to broad immigration legislation until they confronted the issue” writes the Foreign News Desk.

Mayorkas’ comments faced pushback and outrage from numerous Border Patrol agents and groups who are actually present and monitoring the border. They argue hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants crossing every month is not indicative of any sort of security at the border.

Foreign Desk News writes:

Some agents have told reporters that the Mayorkas and the White House are telling lies to the American people, using issues like crime, poverty, and others as reasons for asylum, which does not meet the legal standard of immigration law.

Groups like the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) disputed Mayorkas’ claim arguing that lethal drugs like fentanyl and unaccompanied migrants have come into the U.S. since President Biden and his team reversed policies from the former Trump administration. High-level officials in the DHS and Border Patrol told reporters that there were around 440,000 cases where individuals snuck past agents since October 2021, with over 50,000 in May.

Many agents in the DHS and Border Patrol stated that the U.S. southern border is the least secure in history, using evidence from the several million known instances of individuals coming successfully into America and the several thousands of overdose deaths from narcotic drugs.

The Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC), reports that deaths from drug overdoses rose to an all-time high of more than 107,000 in 2021. “This report indicated a 15 percent increase from 2021, following the previous year when fentanyl drug overdose deaths jumped to 30 percent.”

Continue Reading
4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Spudnut

    July 23, 2022 at 12:00 pm

    Typical of this regime. Throw out a bunch of blatant lies and hope their low-information supporters don’t decide to do even as much as a cursory Google search.

    The situation at the southern border is so bad that even Google can’t bury it.

    OBiden does nothing but tell whoppers every time he gets in front of a microphone. I hope, and I believe the public is catching on to their mis-information campaign.

  2. EMG

    July 23, 2022 at 1:30 pm

    Majorkas is a real threat to law and order in the United States. Nothing short of impeachment is merited.

  3. Richard Mabry

    July 23, 2022 at 5:37 pm

    Every one who voted for Biden (or let him stuff the ballot box) is regretting the cheating that allowed our “leader” to be such a weakling.

  4. Mark C Kasmarek

    July 24, 2022 at 11:11 am

    No no!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Immigration

BREAKING: Senate votes down both articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in party-line vote

Published

on

Mayorkas

The Senate voted down two articles of impeachment Wednesday which alleged Department of Homeland Security Secretary  Alejandro Mayorkas engaged in the “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” regarding the southern border in his capacity as DHS secretary. The second claimed Mayorkas had breached public trust.

What resulted in a party-line vote, began with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., proposing a point of order declaring the first article unconstitutional, to which the majority of senators agreed following several failed motions by Republicans. The article was deemed unconstitutional by a vote of 51-48, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting present.

Fox News reports:

Schumer’s point of order was proposed after his request for unanimous consent, which would have provided a set amount of time for debate among the senators, as well as votes on two GOP resolutions and a set amount of agreed upon points of order, was objected to by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

Schmitt stated in his objection that the Senate should conduct a full trial into the impeachment articles against Mayorkas, rather than the debate and points of order suggested by Schumer’s unanimous consent request, which would be followed by a likely successful motion to dismiss the articles. 

Republican senators took issue with Schumer’s point of order, as agreeing to it would effectively kill the first of the two articles. Several GOP lawmakers proposed motions, which took precedence over the point of order, to adjourn or table the point, among other things. But all GOP motions failed. 

After another batch of motions to avoid voting on Schumer’s second point of order, which would deem the second article unconstitutional, the Senate agreed to it. The vote was along party lines 51-49, with Murkowski rejoining the Republicans. 

Continue Reading

Trending