Media
Take A Glimpse Into The Deranged New Playground For Online Liberals
A new liberal playground?
The Daily Caller headlines: Take A Glimpse Into The Deranged New Playground For Online Liberals
The story by Editor at Large John Loftus reports:
“If you thought online liberals were weird before the election of Donald Trump, I have some news for you.
Since Trump’s victory, liberals have departed Elon Musk’s X for Bluesky, a social media platform modeled exactly after Twitter. Several bigger accounts, including Democrat New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, actors Mark Hamill and George Takei and The New York Times, have also joined the new platform.
But, in a matter of weeks, the platform has already devolved into a deranged playground for the terminally online, the kind of liberals who might actually be insane. The kind who identify as autistic, transgender, polyamorous allies to pedophiles. Although disturbing to read at times, the posts are perfect self-parody.
To kick it off, here we have a liberal defending pedophilia:
‘As I’m sure most folks are aware, pedophilia is a subject that’s nearly impossible to discuss in public with nuance. It’s commonly assumed that pedophiles are either child molesters will inevitably abuse kids.
Neither are true, and I believe the resulting stigma is needlessly harmful.’
Liberal graphic designers are now creating new variations of the queer flag. There’s a flag for all my homies who identify as autistic and polyamorous? Who knew?
One Bluesky liberal thinks there should be urinals in women’s restrooms …
A couple users were enraged that media was covering the sentencing of Laken Riley’s murderer, the illegal Jose Ibarra.
What’s a liberal platform without some Branch Covidians openly worshipping beloved St. Fauci?
One very talented, if a bit mentally unstable, individual posted her (his?) original song about feeling sad over the election results.
Can we get a wellness check on Hollywood resistance liberal Rob Reiner? He’s been awfully quiet since Trump won. Ah, here he is. Still cooking, I see.
“Rob Reiner @robreiner.bsky.social.20h
All the abuse and hate from Twitter has now spewed over to here. There seems to be no point anymore.”
We have a small, trigger-happy faction who want to murder millions of Russians and kick start World War III. Totally normal behavior.
Babe, wake up, a new sub-group to the sub-group to the sub-group just came out and identified!
Whoa, one liberal woman promises that “Elin” and “Tromp” won’t derail her plans for “writing hornier.” Period. Slay.
… Never Trump grifter Rick Wilson got called out for failing to defend pedophiles, known to Bluesky users as MAPs, or Minor Attracted Persons …
Last but not least, we have “Star Wars” actor Mark Hamill pretending he’s part of a rebel resistance fighting against the evil empire:
@markhamillofficial.bsky.social
Believe in yourself! Work hard, never give up & anything’s possible! OR: Kick back, relax & aim low: You’ll never be disappointed…I IGNORE ALL DMs!
Dear reader, I’m tapping out. I can’t go on any longer. There’s only so much left-wing delusion one can handle in a day.”
Mr. Loftus does manage to keep his sense of humor.
In a major development on Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a law requiring TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell the popular app or face a ban in the United States. A panel of three judges unanimously ruled against TikTok’s petition for relief, solidifying a legal battle that now appears headed for the Supreme Court, reports National Review.
The appeals court ruled that the contested portions of the law withstand constitutional scrutiny, with Judge Douglas Ginsburg emphasizing the government’s national security rationale. “The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States,” Ginsburg wrote. “Here the Government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States.”
U.S. officials, including leaders at the Department of Justice, have consistently raised alarms about TikTok’s relationship with the Chinese Communist Party, calling the app a national security threat of “immense depth and scale.”
TikTok argued that the law infringes on its First Amendment rights and that divesting from ByteDance is “not possible technologically, commercially, or legally” by the January 19 deadline. However, the court dismissed these arguments, leaving the app’s fate in jeopardy as the deadline looms.
Both the U.S. government and TikTok had pushed for a decision by Friday to allow sufficient time for potential appeals or alternative measures before the ban takes effect.
With the appeals court’s ruling, TikTok’s next move is likely to petition the Supreme Court. The justices could temporarily block the law’s implementation while they consider the case or allow the lower court’s decision to stand.
-
Immigration7 days agoNinth Circuit Rules Federal Government Can Deport Illegal Immigrants
-
Nation4 days agoSatanic Temple Offers Religious Ed Program to Ohio Elementary During School Hours
-
Nation6 days agoTrump Assassination Attempt Hearing Turns Into Screaming Match
-
Nation1 day ago‘Defund the Police’ Activist Pleads For Help After U-HauI Truck Stolen
