Connect with us

Elections

Silicon Valley CENSORSHIP appears to have led to voter suppression

Published

on

social media conservatives censorship 1

As more election fraud and tampering become evident, many are questioning the role tech monopolies played in censoring critical information before the election.

“The worst forms of election tampering took place far from polling sites,” said Tucker Carlson last night on his show.

Carlson alleges that big tech companies suppressed the voices of Trump supporters and hid damaging information about Joe Biden before the election.

Both Twitter and Facebook censored a New York Post article about Hunter Biden’s emails. Facebook limited the distribution of the article and Twitter blocked people from posting it.

A report from Breitbart News Network found that Google suppressed its stories about Joe Biden from the middle of 2020 through election day.

“Clicks and impressions to Breitbart News from Google searches for ‘Joe Biden’ are still at zero, where they have remained for the past seven months,” Breitbart reported. “Clicks and impressions to Breitbart News from ‘Joe Biden’ Google searches displayed a healthy pattern of activity until the middle of 2020, when they suddenly flatlined. The plunge first occurred after a major update to Google’s search algorithm in May 2020. Searches for ‘Hunter Biden’ show a similar pattern, with far more clicks and impressions before Google’s May update.”

Utah Senator Mike Lee is questioning whether Google’s top executive lied to Congress after new reports surfaced that Google sent out voting reminders just to customers it profiled as liberals.

Lee joined Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Texas Senator Ted Cruz in writing a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai warning they will review “Google’s politically biased activities” during the election.

This comes after Robert Epstein, a research psychologist for the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, found evidence that Google was sending voting reminders only to liberals.

Epstein said he had recruited a politically diverse group of 733 field agents in Arizona, Florida and North Carolina. Between Oct. 26 and 29, Epstein said they found “only our liberal field agents received vote reminders on Google’s home page.”

Lee in a written statement said, “Dr. Epstein’s allegations appear credible and are very concerning.”

He added, “If it is true that Google is targeting messages to help Democrats win elections, then Google has not been truthful to Congress and has deceived countless Americans. These allegations must be taken seriously. Congress must have all the facts and evidence from Dr. Epstein with responses from Google as we consider changes to address these serious issues.”

From all the evidence, it appears Silicon Valley’s censoring of information is likely weakening our democracy.

“If we’re going to have free and fair elections going forward, and we must, then we have to end Silicon Valleys total control of information,” said Carlson.

You may like

Continue Reading

Elections

Biden’s Poor Polling and Harris’ Low Electability Rating Could Have Democrats Considering ‘Nuclear Option’

Behind-the-scenes discussion of how Democrats could arrive at a third option for the next election is underway

Published

on

Biden Kamala
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

With polls consistently showing a poor approval rating for President Joe Biden at below 40 percent, and a recent poll put Kamala Harris’ electability at only 28 percent, Democrats are in full panic mode.

Behind-the-scenes discussion of how Democrats could arrive at a third option for the next election is underway. Operatives are preparing for the possibility of a contested presidential primary in which other would-be nominees take on Ms. Harris, but that could be damaging for the party” reports the Telegraph.

Therefore, Democrats are allegedly whispering about a potential “nuclear option” that would call for current Vice President Harris to be nominated to the Supreme Court. The Telegraph writes that “while the scenario is highly improbable, and perhaps a reflection of a Washington rumor mill in overdrive, the fact it has come up at all shows the depths of the predicament the Biden administration currently finds itself in, amid rising inflation, a stalled domestic agenda, and foreign policy disasters.”

The theory in question would call for President Biden to nominate Harris to the Supreme Court in the event a seat opens in the next three years during his administration. Biden could then use “Section 2 of the 25thAmendment to nominate a more popular vice president”, adds the Telegraph.

Under Section 1 of the 25th Amendment, that new vice president could assume the presidency if Biden were to step down while president. They would then become the Democratic nominee in the 2024 presidential election. That same individual could also be the presumptive Democratic nominee in 2024 if Biden chooses not to run for re-election.

One piece of information that is wetting Democrats’ whistle is that current Supreme Court Justice Breyer has said he does not “want to stay on the Supreme Court until I die.”

The Telegraph notes that “the discussion over potential successors to Mr. Biden is highly unusual less than a year into an administration.”

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending