Connect with us


Sara Carter: MSM Never Covered The Russia Hoax, They Still Won’t



Screenshot 2020 02 19 08.11.57
Listen to “Jenna Ellis: A vote for Biden is a vote for the destruction of America” on Spreaker.

From the beginning of her covering the Russia hoax, Sara A. Carter was sure the story she discovered about a fake dossier and an effort to ensure President Donald Trump would never take office would be one the mainstream outlets would pick up.

She quickly learned that wasn’t the case.

“I remember when I first started breaking stories on the FBI, on Andrew McCabe, on James Comey, what was going on in the FBI, the unjust investigation into Michael Flynn, the FISA, the unmaskings, I thought ‘well this story’s only gonna be handled by me for a short time period because the New York Times, the Washington Post, all the other news outlets with all the money and all the power behind them are gonna jump on this and they’re gonna expose this,” Carter told Fox Business host David Asman Thursday night.

At first, Carter was “stunned” at the fact that those mainstream news outlets weren’t covering or investigating that story further. Soon, she learned it was because of their “hatred towards President Trump.”

It’s still the case today. For example, this week former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates testified before the House Judiciary Committee and revealed many surprising facts about the origins of the FBI’s targeting of former White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, saying the Bureau’s Director James Comey went “rogue.” That big nugget of information wasn’t covered by ABC, NBC, and CBS. In fact, those outlets chose not to cover the hearing altogether.

“So they were willing to let these agencies be weaponized, spy illegally on a presidential campaign all because they themselves have animous towards this President,” Carter said. “And, remember, David, a lot of their sources were these folks that were basically breaking the law… yeah, the same people that are being investigated by John Durham.”

She added, “So it’s not surprising to me at all that they just ignored Sally Yates completely, they ignored the idea of what she said, that he went ‘rogue,’ and she should’ve been pressed further because January 25th, when she ran back to the White House to get Flynn fired.”

“Just remember, this is how the rats try to jump off a sinking ship.”

With reports that U.S. Attorney John Durham is nearing an end to his investigation into the origins of the Russia probe, Carter says she’s still cynical as to whether anyone will actually be held accountable and if there will be any indictments.

“Look, we saw what happened under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, absolutely nothing, even with Huber,” Carter explained. “And, now, we’re sitting around waiting. All of us, scratching our heads wondering ‘well what’s going on here? Why hasn’t there been a report? Why hasn’t there been an indictment?”

“We know that they left out exculpatory information on this FISA, they were spying illegally on Carter Page, they made up information, we have a fake Russian dossier, I can go on and on and on about what happened here. We all know the facts.”


Continue Reading


BREAKING: Senate votes down both articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in party-line vote




The Senate voted down two articles of impeachment Wednesday which alleged Department of Homeland Security Secretary  Alejandro Mayorkas engaged in the “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” regarding the southern border in his capacity as DHS secretary. The second claimed Mayorkas had breached public trust.

What resulted in a party-line vote, began with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., proposing a point of order declaring the first article unconstitutional, to which the majority of senators agreed following several failed motions by Republicans. The article was deemed unconstitutional by a vote of 51-48, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting present.

Fox News reports:

Schumer’s point of order was proposed after his request for unanimous consent, which would have provided a set amount of time for debate among the senators, as well as votes on two GOP resolutions and a set amount of agreed upon points of order, was objected to by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

Schmitt stated in his objection that the Senate should conduct a full trial into the impeachment articles against Mayorkas, rather than the debate and points of order suggested by Schumer’s unanimous consent request, which would be followed by a likely successful motion to dismiss the articles. 

Republican senators took issue with Schumer’s point of order, as agreeing to it would effectively kill the first of the two articles. Several GOP lawmakers proposed motions, which took precedence over the point of order, to adjourn or table the point, among other things. But all GOP motions failed. 

After another batch of motions to avoid voting on Schumer’s second point of order, which would deem the second article unconstitutional, the Senate agreed to it. The vote was along party lines 51-49, with Murkowski rejoining the Republicans. 

Continue Reading