Connect with us


Sara Carter joins ‘Hannity’ to discuss Biden administration’s border failures



Investigative reporter and Fox News contributor Sara Carter and National Border Patrol Council President Brandon Judd discuss major differences in border policy between the Trump and Biden administrations on the ‘Hannity’ segment ‘liberal lawlessness’.

Mayorkas was asked during a congressional testimony “do you disagree with your chief in border control that the border is not safe?” He responded in that regard “I do.”

Hannity is furious that Mayorkas “continuously gets away with” lying when stating that the border is secure. Hannity asks Carter, who has been investigating the border crisis for years, for her take.

Carter says there are 85,000 children that have “disappeared into the fabric of this country” and Health and Human Services cannot find them. Some have been abused, sexually abused, and found in homes that were not their family or parents.

The Biden administration “wants” to leave this border open, and the border agents are left helpless against the failed policies and rhetoric.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


BREAKING: Senate votes down both articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in party-line vote




The Senate voted down two articles of impeachment Wednesday which alleged Department of Homeland Security Secretary  Alejandro Mayorkas engaged in the “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” regarding the southern border in his capacity as DHS secretary. The second claimed Mayorkas had breached public trust.

What resulted in a party-line vote, began with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., proposing a point of order declaring the first article unconstitutional, to which the majority of senators agreed following several failed motions by Republicans. The article was deemed unconstitutional by a vote of 51-48, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting present.

Fox News reports:

Schumer’s point of order was proposed after his request for unanimous consent, which would have provided a set amount of time for debate among the senators, as well as votes on two GOP resolutions and a set amount of agreed upon points of order, was objected to by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

Schmitt stated in his objection that the Senate should conduct a full trial into the impeachment articles against Mayorkas, rather than the debate and points of order suggested by Schumer’s unanimous consent request, which would be followed by a likely successful motion to dismiss the articles. 

Republican senators took issue with Schumer’s point of order, as agreeing to it would effectively kill the first of the two articles. Several GOP lawmakers proposed motions, which took precedence over the point of order, to adjourn or table the point, among other things. But all GOP motions failed. 

After another batch of motions to avoid voting on Schumer’s second point of order, which would deem the second article unconstitutional, the Senate agreed to it. The vote was along party lines 51-49, with Murkowski rejoining the Republicans. 

Continue Reading