Connect with us

National Security

Sara Carter Exclusive: military age male illegal immigrants say Biden is their president

Published

on

President Joe Biden is finally visiting the border, but still he’s staying very far away from any and all migrant crossing hotspots, states Sean Hannity. Sara Carter spent the day at Arizona’s border where she spoke to dozens of migrants from all around the world entering the country illegally. The consensus was unanimous: they all knew President Joe Biden is letting immigrants flood into the U.S.

One individual, a male from Guinea, told Carter that Joe Biden ‘is the president of the immigrants; he is working for the immigrants.’ Carter told Hannity that 1,500 people every single day are coming out of one of the most dangerous places on earth, the jungle near Sasabe, Arizona’s border.

Carter also exclusively showed Hannity a makeshift camp which had been set up at the border by a non-governmental organization (NGO). Smugglers are aware of the location and drop off migrants.

“Every single person coming across the border illegally, from Guinea, Pakistan, El Salvador, Ecuador, you name it, all said the U.S. has an open border policy; an invitation from President Biden” Carter explained.

Carter spoke with the Vice President of the Border Patrol Union asking if he thought the American people comprehend the gravity, the national security implication?

He answered that some people do comprehend it, but Biden still has his loyal followers that believe he is doing his job. However,  the amount of fentanyl and illicit drugs crossing into the U.S. daily, in addition to illegal immigrants coming from 160 plus different countries shows we are very vulnerable to deadly implications. He also explained that the vetting process only has even the slightest chance of working if the individuals have committed crimes in the United States.

Terrifyingly, millions of military aged men from around the world who committed crimes in their home countries are crossing the border. The U.S. agencies will never know they are criminals, and even if they do, their home countries will not take them back.

“Our adversaries such as China and Iran are very aware that our borders are open” and they are taking advantage, Carter laments.

WATCH HERE

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nation

Experts say Congress needs to intervene: troops could be hit with courts-martial for refusing to use preferred pronouns

Published

on

US troops scaled

Military experts believe Congress needs to intervene in the military’s carried away woke agenda “before it’s too late.” Captain Thomas Wheatley, an assistant professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, told the Daily Caller News Foundation the military could seek to formally punish service members for refusing to use another service member’s preferred pronouns under existing policy.

The military “is right to want to protect the rights and welfare of its transgender service members. But it owes the same protection to those who share a different perspective on the issue, especially when that perspective is a deep-seated expression of personal conscience,” Wheatley told the DCNF.

None of the military’s rules explicitly prohibit so-called “misgendering,” when someone uses pronouns to describe a transgender person which do not correspond to the person’s new gender identity, Wheatley explained. However, existing guidance implies that using pronouns rejected by another person violates Military Equal Opportunity (MEO) regulations against sex-based harassment and discrimination.

The DCNF reports:

A 2020 Equal Opportunity law opened the door for commanders to subject someone who refuses to affirm a transgender servicemember’s so-called gender identity to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for charges related to harassment, Capt. Thomas Wheatley, an assistant professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Such a move would likely infringe on a servicemember’s constitutional rights to uphold their conscience, but it might not prevent leaders from employing more subtle ways of disciplining service members.

Service members could conceivably be court-martialed for “refusing to use another person’s self-identified pronouns, even when their refusal stems from principled religious conviction,” Wheatley told the DCNF. “This law applies to service members at all times and in all locations, even when they’re off duty and in the privacy of their off-post residence.”

The UCMJ also prohibits “conduct unbecoming of an officer” under Article 133 and activity that could be seen to discredit the military institution under Article 134 — the same article the military uses to prosecute child pornographers and other acts of sexual deviance, he explained.

“Is it now ‘unbecoming’ and incompatible with service as a commissioned officer to openly hold sincere religious convictions surrounding the act of creation and the nature of human sex?” Wheatley asked.

Wheatley said his interest in the issue was sparked four years ago, when the Army updated its MEO policy stating “violations of MEO and Harassment Prevention and Response policies may result in disciplinary action under the UCMJ.”

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending