A recent Daily Caller News Foundation’s investigation discovered that a bail fund promoted by Sen. Kamala Harris actually helped bail out a man accused of sexually assaulting an eight-year-old girl.
The bail fund – known as the Minnesota Freedom Fund – allowed the child predator to get out of jail in July, according to court documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
The Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF) was touted by Harris, along with other Democratic supporters and celebrities as a means of supporting the rioters that destroyed the city of Minneapolis, following the tragic killing of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer.
I, like many of you, have young children. I just find it absolutely repugnant. If I would’ve supported a fund and then discovered it was helping release child rapists I would have made it my mission to shut it down and I would apologize profusely for doing so. I haven’t heard a peep from Harris.
Harris, who is running as Vice President on the Democratic ticket with former Vice President Joe Biden, needs to explain why she hasn’t spoken out or even looked into what happened with this fund.
It’s frankly unconscionable that a child predator was bailed out of jail by this fund. Anyone who promoted or supported this fund needs to speak out now and explain themselves. Further, the media following her on the campaign trial need to ask her directly about her support for these funds and why she hasn’t spoken out yet?
According to DCNF the fund also helped post bail for a man accused of assaulting a 71-year-old woman during a burglary at her home, court documents obtained by DCNF show. He was bailed out in August. Moreover, less than a week after his release the man was found to be in violation of his bail.
It appears as the DCNF investigation division has discovered that this bail fund is being used to release hardened criminals from jail. They’ve also discovered something that anyone who studies Harris’s career knows – she panders to whoever she believes can serve her political goals best and doesn’t look back.
First, she didn’t even bother looking into who the bail fund would be used for – it was just politically expedient for her to make a statement to the special interest groups and leftist groups that hijacked George Floyd’s tragic killing by a Minneapolis police office
At one point she touted herself as a tough law and order prosecutor. But then her record came under severe criticism after those who knew her best outed her for her wishy washy ideology that would change as quickly as the political winds would carry her.
That’s what she did when the riots started. Supporting the rioters, it appeared, would be make Harris more palatable to the groups she and former Vice President Joe Biden needed support from to help them win the upcoming election.
But remember this from the NYT:
With the growing recognition that prosecutors hold the keys to a fairer criminal justice system, the term “progressive prosecutor” has almost become trendy. This is how Senator Kamala Harris of California, a likely presidential candidate and a former prosecutor, describes herself.
But she’s not.
Time after time, when progressives urged her to embrace criminal justice reforms as a district attorney and then the state’s attorney general, Ms. Harris opposed them or stayed silent. Most troubling, Ms. Harris fought tooth and nail to uphold wrongful convictions that had been secured through official misconduct that included evidence tampering, false testimony and the suppression of crucial information by prosecutors.
Court documents reviewed by the DCNF reveal that the bail fund also provided support in June to a man who allegedly stomped on and robbed a victim on the streets of Minneapolis on May 25, the same day George Floyd died while in police custody.
You may like
REPORT: China has vast network of covert police stations around the world
China has a vast network of covert police stations abroad, according to a recent report by Safeguard Defenders, an NGO that focuses on human rights violations in China and other Asian countries. These police stations serve consular functions, but are also used by China to crack down on what the CCP deems “illegal” activity of Chinese nationals abroad. The police stations include at least 38 run by the Fuzhou City police, and 22 run by the Qingtian City police. Cities housing these police stations include New York, Toronto (which has three stations), London (two), Paris (three), Buenos Aires, Rio De Janeiro, and Tokyo.
Key findings of the report are below.
“Persuaded to return”
According to China, China has “persuaded to return [to China]” 230,000 Chinese nationals living aboard from April 2021 to July 2022 alone to face charges of fraud and telecommunications fraud. A Yangxia police station set up in Mozambique, for example, persuaded a Chinese national to return to China after being accused of stealing money from his employer. Chinese authorities also put pressure on the accused family to convince the accused to surrender.
Roughly 54,000 Chinese nationals were persuaded to return from northern Myanmar alone, in the first nine months of 2021. In July 2022, the government of Wenchang City warned that its citizens living in northern Myanmar must check in with their local police stations or face multiple penalties including blocking their children from attending urban schools back in China. Similarly, in February 2022, the government of Liayang City stated that Chinese “illegally staying” in northern Myanmar must return or the bank accounts of their immediate family members could be frozen.
The Nine Forbidden Countries
China has claimed that nine countries contain serious levels of fraud and telecom fraud perpetrated by Chinese nationals. Since November 2021, China has declared that Chinese citizens living in these nine countries must return to China immediately unless they have an “emergency reason” or a “strict necessity” to travel or stay in those countries. Those countries are: Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, the UAE, and Turkey. However, the report questions whether these countries are truly awash in such fraud, as most of China’s oversees police stations are in the West, and only one of the nine countries (Cambodia) has such a police station. Chinese staying in the nine forbidden countries, as well as threats to family members as stated above, creates a “guilt-by-association” atmosphere intended to repatriate the Chinese nationals.
According to the report, Chinese police stations abroad serve to bypass “bilateral extradition treaties or other mechanisms of judicial cooperation” to cooperate with CCP-linked NGOs which effectively “[sets] up an alternative policing and judicial system within third countries.” Instead of using international judicial cooperation, which establishes due process, the presumption of innocence, and the right to a fair trial, China uses the above “persuade-to-return” methods and transnational police stations to circumvent international law and coerce Chinese nationals to return to China for trials. These policies show the power of China’s long-arm oppression over its own subjects.
You can follow Steve Postal on Twitter @HebraicMosaic
You may like
Nation3 days ago
MD nuclear scientist, wife, face life in prison after pleading guilty in nuclear secrets case
Immigration4 days ago
IG Audit shows nonprofit wasted $17 million taxpayer dollars on hotels to not house illegal foreign nationals
War on Drugs3 days ago
‘Mass poisoning:’ Officials seize 15,000 fentanyl pills disguised as candy
Immigration5 days ago
Texas has raised over $55 million from private donations to secure border, build a wall