Connect with us

Elections

Pence’s Notes Unveil Deep State’s Plot to Undermine President Donald J Trump

Published

on

Screen Shot 2020 07 17 at 1.42.28 PM

In a bombshell revelation, the Special Counsel’s indictment against former President Donald J Trump has brought to light crucial “contemporaneous notes” taken by then-Vice President Mike Pence.

These notes expose a deep state conspiracy aimed at sabotaging Trump’s efforts to secure the election and challenge the unproven claims of fraud. The indictment, filled with unproven allegations against Trump, attempts to distract from the true intentions of Pence’s notes.

According to the 45-page indictment, Trump is charged with various federal offenses related to his actions after the 2020 presidential election. However, these charges seem to be part of a coordinated effort by the deep state to silence Trump and undermine his presidency through weaponization of the Department of Justice. The true story is hidden in Pence’s notes, which provide valuable insight into the plot against him.

The indictment alleges that Trump tried to pressure Pence into altering the election results, but the reality is that the former president was merely asking for transparency and truth. Pence’s notes show that Trump expressed legitimate concerns about election fraud and wanted the vice president to ensure that only valid electoral votes were counted.

Furthermore, the indictment’s claims of “knowingly false” statements by Trump are misleading and fail to address the overwhelming evidence of irregularities and discrepancies in the election process. Trump was rightfully trying to protect the integrity of the election and ensure that the American people’s voices were heard.

The alleged meeting between Trump and his associates, including “Co-Conspirator 2,” was likely a strategy session to uphold election integrity. The deep state’s attempt to vilify these conversations is a desperate attempt to discredit Trump and his efforts to bring accountability to the electoral process.

In the context of the Constitution, some argue that the Vice President possesses the authority to influence electoral votes. However, during the 2020 election, Vice President Pence faced scrutiny for not utilizing this power to its full extent, raising questions about his commitment to upholding the democratic process. The case of the 1960 election between JFK and Nixon serves as an example of how electoral votes can be contested and potentially changed by a determined Vice President.

Unlike Nixon, who considered challenging the electoral votes in Hawaii during the 1960 election, Pence chose not to take a more assertive stance in response to Trump’s requests. Critics argue that Pence’s hesitancy may have been driven by political calculations rather than a genuine desire to safeguard the Constitution. While the Constitution may grant the Vice President the right to influence electoral votes, Pence’s reluctance to do so left many questioning his dedication to the principles of free and fair elections.

In President Donald J Trump’s speech at the rally, he never called for violence or insurrection. His supporters’ chants were a reflection of their frustration with a system that appeared to be failing them. The indictment’s portrayal of the rally is a biased narrative designed to tarnish Trump’s legacy.

As we move forward, it is crucial to remember that Trump is entitled to the presumption of innocence. His efforts to seek transparency and challenge the election results were in line with his commitment to democracy and the American people. Pence’s notes provide a unique perspective on the true intentions behind the scenes, revealing a coordinated effort to undermine Trump’s presidency.

As the investigation continues, we must stay vigilant and question the deep state’s narrative. The truth lies within Pence’s notes, and it is time to uncover the real plot against Trump and restore faith in our electoral process.

Follow Alexander Carter on Twitter @AlexCarterDC for more!

You may like

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nation

Elizabeth Warren Acknowledges Unintended Consequences of Obamacare

Published

on

Elizabeth Warren

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, a longtime supporter of the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, is now acknowledging the unintended consequences of the healthcare legislation, particularly its impact on industry consolidation and rising healthcare prices.

Warren, who has been a vocal proponent of Obamacare, has recently had what the Wall Street Journal reported as an “epiphany” regarding the consequences of the healthcare law. In a letter addressed to the Health and Human Services Department inspector general, Warren, along with Senator Mike Braun of Indiana, expressed concerns about vertically-integrated healthcare companies potentially increasing prescription drug costs and evading federal regulations.

According to reports from Fox News, the bipartisan letter highlighted issues with the nation’s largest health insurers allegedly bypassing Obamacare’s medical loss ratio (MLR). According to Warren, these insurers, through vertical integration, have manipulated the system, leading to “sky-high prescription drug costs and excessive corporate profits.”

The senators detailed how conglomerates, like UnitedHealth Group, with ownership across various healthcare sectors, could inflate medical payments to pharmacies and, by realizing those payments on the pharmacy side, appear to comply with MLR requirements while retaining more profits.

Moreover, despite the Democrats’ argument that the MLR would benefit patients, it has incentivized insurers to merge with or acquire pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), retail and specialty pharmacies, and healthcare providers. This, in turn, has made healthcare spending less transparent, as insurers can allegedly shift profits to their affiliates by increasing reimbursements.

Warren, who has consistently voted against Obamacare repeal efforts, notably advocated for a “Medicare for All” proposal during her 2020 presidential campaign. Despite her prior support for the healthcare law, Warren’s recent concerns about its unintended consequences have raised questions about the long-term effects of Obamacare and its impact on the healthcare industry.

You may like

Continue Reading

Trending