Connect with us


PA Children’s Hospital offered puberty blockers to kids as young as 8 and surgical referrals for 14yr olds



gettyimages 454380796 594x594 1

Records show that the Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania (CHOP) offers intense therapies such as puberty blockers to children as young as 8 years old and surgery referrals as young as 14. The hospital’s Sexuality Development Program assists in the medical gender transition process, but records show just how young their patients have been.

The Daily Caller News Foundation obtained and reviewed the documents which also show the clinic has publicly advocated for some cross-sex surgeries for minors, as well as puberty blockers for children and have also “downplayed” the seriousness of the infertility that is often the result of the medical interventions. The clinic worked so hard for minors to surgically transition that they hired and even employed a social worker who served as a “surgery advocate,” collecting letters of support on behalf of gender dysphoric minors in order to persuade insurance companies to cover their surgeries, according to a 2021 report from CHOP.

The clinic’s co-founder Dr. Linda Hawkins has completely dismissed the focus on young children stating, “I think it’s really important to remember that age is a number. But as an adolescent medicine and developmental specialist, we know that where a child is cognitively and socially is more important than that exact number of their age.”

The clinic has referred children as young as 14 for “top surgery,” a euphemism for mastectomies or breast construction, though most referrals are for patients aged 16-18, Dowshen told lawmakers at a Pennsylvania House of Representatives Health Committee hearing in 2020.

The Daily Caller reports:

The clinic’s co-founders, Dr. Linda Hawkins and Dr. Nadia Dowshen, advocated for “top surgery” for minors in a 2021 paper published in Pediatrics, the medical journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

“We observed consensus that chest dysphoria is a major source of distress and can be functionally disabling to transmasculine youth. MCS performed during adolescence, including before age 18, can alleviate suffering and improve functioning,” they wrote in their paper.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Harvard Reinstates Standardized Testing Requirement for Admissions



GettyImages 1268848905 scaled

Harvard University announcement it will reverse its test-optional policy and reinstate standardized testing as a requirement for admission. The move has stirred a contentious debate within the academic community. Effective for applicants seeking entry in the fall of 2025, Harvard College will mandate the submission of either SAT or ACT scores, with limited exceptions for circumstances hindering access to these exams.

Hoekstra contends that standardized tests provide crucial predictive insights into a student’s potential for success in higher education and beyond. By reinstating the testing requirement, Harvard seeks to gather more comprehensive data, particularly beneficial for identifying talent across diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Proponents of the move, like Harvard Kennedy School’s political economy professor David J. Deming, emphasize the universality of standardized tests, arguing that they offer a level playing field for all applicants. Deming underscores the accessibility of these tests compared to other metrics like personal essays, which may favor privileged students with greater resources.

However, the decision has sparked criticism from those who argue that standardized tests perpetuate inequities in admissions. Critics point to studies, such as those conducted by Harvard economists Raj Chetty and others, which highlight disparities in access to advanced courses and extracurricular opportunities among students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

The controversy surrounding Harvard’s policy shift reflects broader concerns within higher education about equity, diversity, and inclusion. While standardized testing may offer a standardized measure of academic aptitude, it also raises questions about its ability to accurately assess a student’s potential in light of systemic educational disparities.

Continue Reading