Connect with us

Healthcare

‘One of the safest places’: CDC Director Does Not Support Closing Schools

Published

on

At a coronavirus task force briefing Wednesday, the CDC director said schools are the “safest place” for children to be during the pandemic.

Dr.  Robert Redfield of the CDC said, “the truth is, for kids K through 12, one of the safest places they can be, from our perspective, is to remain in school.”

He added, “I will say, back in the spring, there was limited data; today, there’s extensive data that we have — we’ve gathered over the last two to three months — to confirm that K-through- 12 schools can operate with face-to-face learning, and they can do it safely and they can do it responsibly.”

Children are more likely to be exposed to the virus outside of the classroom, research has found.

“The infections that we’ve identified in schools, when they’ve been evaluated, were not acquired in schools.  They were actually acquired in the community and in the household,” Redfield explained.

Vice President Mike Pence agreed with Redfield and reiterated that closing schools would be a mistake.

“The more we’ve learned about this virus, the more it’s simply affirmed that we think our kids belong in the classroom.  We’re absolutely committed to continue to provide resources so our kids, our teachers, our administrators can safely — safely get back to school,” Pence said.

Dr. Elinore McCance-Katz, Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use, spoke about the negative effects closing schools would have.

“The work that schools and school personnel do daily is valuable beyond any words I can deliver,” McCance-Katz said. “We know that in addition to education, schools provide our children a profound sense of security and stability.  The structure and safety of schools are integral to our children’s whole health.  The role of the school cannot be overstated.”

She emphasized the importance of continuing to wear masks, social distance and wash hands.

“I understand that parents and teachers may feel great anxiety.  That is why we must put into place the safety measures we know work. We must use masks.  We must enforce social distancing.  We must employ creative and innovative ways to limit the number of children and teachers in the building at any given time.  There are tools we have, and we must think through how best to use them to keep our schools open.”

According to Redfield, “It would be counterproductive from my point of view, from a public health point of view, just in containing the epidemic, if there was an emotional response, to say, ‘Let’s close the schools.’”

Continue Reading

China

House Report Uncovers DOJ Secretly Investigated Nonprofit Accused of Channeling Taxpayer Funds to Wuhan Lab

Published

on

A bombshell House committee report released Monday, after a two year investigation, revealed that the Department of Justice (DOJ) secretly initiated a grand jury investigation into EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S. nonprofit accused of channeling taxpayer funds to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), the lab suspected of causing the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report, prepared by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, highlights concerns about EcoHealth’s grants, which allegedly funded gain-of-function research at the Chinese lab. Such research, aimed at enhancing viruses to study their potential risks, has been linked to theories suggesting the virus may have escaped from the lab. Efforts to access related records were reportedly obstructed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Internal emails and documents included in the report reveal that the grand jury issued subpoenas for genetic sequences and correspondence between EcoHealth Alliance’s president, Dr. Peter Daszak, and Dr. Shi Zhengli, a WIV scientist known as the “bat lady” for her work on coronaviruses. One email from EcoHealth’s legal counsel advised omitting references to the DOJ investigation when addressing congressional document requests, underscoring the probe’s secrecy.

The report also criticizes EcoHealth Alliance’s failure to comply with grant requirements. NIH funding facilitated a $4 million project on bat coronaviruses, $1.4 million of which was funneled to WIV. NIH deputy director Dr. Lawrence Tabak admitted the grant supported gain-of-function research, leading to highly infectious virus modifications.

The committee’s findings claim these experiments violated biosafety protocols, and Daszak failed to adequately oversee the research. Calls to bar Daszak and EcoHealth from future funding were reinforced by bipartisan agreement within the subcommittee.

The New York Post writes that the report also evaluated U.S. pandemic response measures, describing prolonged lockdowns as harmful to the economy and public health, especially for younger Americans. Mask mandates and social distancing policies were criticized as “arbitrary” and unsupported by conclusive scientific evidence. Public health officials’ inconsistent messaging, particularly from Dr. Anthony Fauci, contributed to public mistrust, according to the subcommittee.

Continue Reading

Trending