Connect with us

Nation

Nightmare for Seattle residents as City Council overrides Mayor’s veto & pushes to defund police

Published

on

seattle autonomous zone

It’s hard to believe that Seattle’s City Council overrode Mayor Jenny Durkan’s veto of a bill that would cut police funding by around $3 million. But to say we live in strange times would be an understatement.

The vote by the Council was 7-2 Tuesday evening and the results of its disastrous decisions will reverberate throughout the community for years to come.

“We cannot look away from this and we can no longer accept the status quo if we truly believe that Black lives matter,” said Council President Lorena Gonzalez.

Interestingly, Gonzalez didn’t mention former Seattle Police Chief Carmen Best, who retired Sept. 2 after the planned cuts to the department. At the time, Chief Best said that such policies would put her officers at risk and put her department in a “position destined to fail.”

She was Seattle’s first Black police chief and had worked in the Department for nearly three decades. Nobody bothered to listen to her. If the people who pushed for the defunding of the police department really cared about Black lives then the first person they should’ve consulted was Chief Best. They didn’t.

As reported by Fox News, during the hour of public comments on Tuesday, most speakers urged the council to override the veto as a measure of solidarity with the organization Black Lives Matter, The Seattle Times originally reported.

“Everyone deserves to feel safe … Countless videos of Black and brown lives lost here in Seattle and across the country shows us that not everyone feels safe,” González added, according to the Times.

“We need public safety that’s centered on harm reduction, not the status quo…When I look back in this moment of time, I want to be able to tell my daughter, who I’m currently holding in my arms, that I did the right thing and that I voted on the right side of history,” she said.

Maybe Gonzalez should talk to all the families who’ve lost their children in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Baltimore and throughout our nation who’ve been killed in drive by shootings.

Maybe the Seattle City Council should speak to women who’ve been lucky enough to have a police officer available to stop a domestic violence attack against them, or capture a burglar or stop a rapist from attacking them.

Maybe the Council should speak to people who’ve called police as their first line of defense, or as a first responder and had someone trained that could save their lives.

These unbelievable decisions by a so-called ‘woke’ council that they have politicized to show support to the black populations are going to only going to backfire.

It will hurt the communities who need law enforcement the most and usually that’s underprivileged communities with high crime rates.

I should know, I was a journalist covering some of the most underprivileged, gang-ridden communities during the beginning of my career. I also lived in one of those communities throughout high school and during the first decade of my older children’s lives.

Read my first major series of stories from the Daily Bulletin about the children raised in these neighborhoods and the law enforcement officials who protect them.

Jamie’s story was always one of the most important series of social justice stories I worked on because it revealed the community as a whole – not one person to blame, not one group of people to blame but it forced the residents of San Bernardino County and Pomona to take a deeper look and search for solutions to the violence.

Seattle is just a microcosm of what is happening across our nation. The push from the left and Democrats to vilify the police has harmed our nation immeasurably. It will not only lead to more officers leaving the force but it will leave communities vulnerable to crime and nefarious networks that already hold many underprivileged communities hostage.

Law and order exists in society for a reason. Police officers are the first line of defense for our communities and the Democrats who’ve pushed against law enforcement can’t make two sets of rules – one for them and the other for the community.

What I mean is, if regular citizens can’t get a police officer when they need them most, then the Democrats, along with the radical left who pushed to defund the police, should also be in the same boat.

There should be no privileges for those officials in the communities that have chosen to defund law enforcement.

Continue Reading

Immigration

BREAKING: Senate votes down both articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in party-line vote

Published

on

Mayorkas

The Senate voted down two articles of impeachment Wednesday which alleged Department of Homeland Security Secretary  Alejandro Mayorkas engaged in the “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” regarding the southern border in his capacity as DHS secretary. The second claimed Mayorkas had breached public trust.

What resulted in a party-line vote, began with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., proposing a point of order declaring the first article unconstitutional, to which the majority of senators agreed following several failed motions by Republicans. The article was deemed unconstitutional by a vote of 51-48, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting present.

Fox News reports:

Schumer’s point of order was proposed after his request for unanimous consent, which would have provided a set amount of time for debate among the senators, as well as votes on two GOP resolutions and a set amount of agreed upon points of order, was objected to by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

Schmitt stated in his objection that the Senate should conduct a full trial into the impeachment articles against Mayorkas, rather than the debate and points of order suggested by Schumer’s unanimous consent request, which would be followed by a likely successful motion to dismiss the articles. 

Republican senators took issue with Schumer’s point of order, as agreeing to it would effectively kill the first of the two articles. Several GOP lawmakers proposed motions, which took precedence over the point of order, to adjourn or table the point, among other things. But all GOP motions failed. 

After another batch of motions to avoid voting on Schumer’s second point of order, which would deem the second article unconstitutional, the Senate agreed to it. The vote was along party lines 51-49, with Murkowski rejoining the Republicans. 

Continue Reading

Trending