“They have to rob, steal, rape, kill and fight in order to survive,” Nick Cannon said about white people as a whole in a podcast last month with former Public Enemy rapper Professor Griff — who is known himself for having said that Jews are “wicked” many years ago.
Cannon was the executive producer and chairman of TeenNick and the executive producer of MTV’s Wild ‘N Out — he’s since been fired from the network.
Among the comments made, Cannon said whites are “a little less,” “closer to animals” then other races, and “[whites] had to be savages, they had to be barbaric, because they’re in these Nordic mountains, they’re in these rough torrential environments.” Cannon made strange connections between skin pigment colors and the actions and beliefs each race has a result.
His guest, Professor Griff, was kicked from Public Enemy in 1989 for saying all Jews are “wicked.” To this controversy, Griff told Cannon that “I’m hated now because I told the truth.” Cannon said he was “speaking facts.”
“Semitic people are black people” Cannon said in the episode. “You can’t be anti-Semitic when we are the Semitic people.”
This slew of comments did not please his employer, ViacomCBS, where he has worked for over two decades.
“ViacomCBS’s statement on the firing said, “We are deeply troubled that Nick has failed to acknowledge or apologize for perpetuating anti-Semitism, and we are terminating our relationship with him.”
Interestingly, Breitbart reported that Charlamagne Tha God reacted to the news by saying Cannon’s firing proves that Jews “have the power.”
He said that white people have a “history of mass racial violence in this country” and “that’s what you can do when you have the power. … Listen, Nick is my guy. I hate it had to be him, but that’s what you can do when you have the power. And if there’s one thing Jewish people have showed us, it’s they have the power.”
You may like
Multiple states launch lawsuit against Biden’s student-loan forgiveness plan
Breaking Thursday, the states of Nebraska, Missouri, Arkansas, Kansas, Iowa, and South Carolina joined together to file a lawsuit against President Biden’s administration in order to stop the student loan-forgiveness program from taking effect.
“In addition to being economically unwise and downright unfair, the Biden Administration’s Mass Debt Cancellation is yet another example in a long line of unlawful regulatory actions,” argued the plaintiffs in their filing.
The attorneys general spearheading the legal challenge also submit that “no statute permits President Biden to unilaterally relieve millions of individuals from their obligation to pay loans they voluntarily assumed.”
Biden, however, has argued that he is able to unilaterally cancel student debt to mitigate the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic. Specifically, writes National Review, a Department of Education memo released by his administration asserts that the HEROES Act, which passed in 2003 and allows the secretary of education to provide student-debt relief “in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency,” provides the legal basis for the cancellation.
But, National Review notes that the plaintiffs point out that Biden declared in a recent 60 Minutes interview that “the pandemic is over.”
The legal brief also adds:
“The [HEROES] Act requires ED [Education Department] to tailor any waiver or modification as necessary to address the actual financial harm suffered by a borrower due to the relevant military operation or emergency… This relief comes to every borrower regardless of whether her income rose or fell during the pandemic or whether she is in a better position today as to her student loans than before the pandemic.”
Moreover, they argue that the HEROES Act was designed to allow the secretary to provide relief in individual cases with proper justification.
The first lawsuit against Biden’s executive order came Tuesday from the Pacific Legal Foundation:
“The administration has created new problems for borrowers in at least six states that tax loan cancellation as income. People like Plaintiff Frank Garrison will actually be worse off because of the cancellation. Indeed, Mr. Garrison will face immediate tax liability from the state of Indiana because of the automatic cancellation of a portion of his debt,” wrote PLF in their own brief.
The state-led lawsuit was filed in a federal district court in Missouri, and asks that the court “temporarily restrain and preliminarily and permanently enjoin implementation and enforcement of the Mass Debt Cancellation,” and declare that it “violates the separation of powers established by the U.S. Constitution,” as well as the Administrative Procedure Act.
You may like
Immigration3 days ago
IG Audit shows nonprofit wasted $17 million taxpayer dollars on hotels to not house illegal foreign nationals
Nation2 days ago
MD nuclear scientist, wife, face life in prison after pleading guilty in nuclear secrets case
War on Drugs2 days ago
‘Mass poisoning:’ Officials seize 15,000 fentanyl pills disguised as candy
Immigration4 days ago
Texas has raised over $55 million from private donations to secure border, build a wall