Connect with us


New Filings in Durham Report say CIA Determined Trump-Russia Hoax Data was ‘User Created’



Screen Shot 2019 12 03 at 11.51.35 AM

Former lawyer for Clinton’s 2016 campaign, Michael Sussman, is being charged with “falsely stating to the general counsel that he was not providing the allegations to the FBI on behalf of any client” when giving false information to the FBI about a tie between then-candidate Trump and a Russian bank with ties to the Kremlin.

New filings by Durham also show he also gave false information to the CIA, having told the agency he met with the FBI, but about something “unrelated.” The information Sussman provided to both federal agencies was provided by “Tech Executive 1” identified as Rodney Joffe.

The data was used to create “an inference” and “narrative” to try and tie Trump to Russia, added Durham. In his court filing Friday, Durham added the CIA had concluded that the data Sussman gave to them was “not technically plausible” and was “user created.”

The data, gathered by Joffe, was exploited “by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump” said Durham in February.

In his filing Friday, Durham wrote he believes the government expects to “adduce evidence at trial” that will reflect that the FBI and the CIA ‘concluded that the Russian Ban 1 allegations were untrue and unsupported.”

Additionally, Durham wrote:

“For example, while the FBI did not reach an ultimate conclusion regarding the data’s accuracy or whether it might have been in whole or in part genuine, spoofed, altered, or fabricated, Agency 2 concluded in early 2017 that the Russian Bank 1 data and Russian Phone Provider 1 data was not ‘technically plausible,’ did not ‘withstand technical scrutiny,’ ‘contained gaps,’ ‘conflicted with [itself],’ and was ‘user created and not machine/tool generated.”


You may like

Continue Reading


  1. ScienceABC123

    April 18, 2022 at 11:55 am

    So the Mueller investigation was a fraud from start to finish. Nothing but a waste of taxpayer dollars, and some very important people knew it all along…

  2. Donna Taylor

    April 19, 2022 at 5:40 pm

    Hillary has evaded jail time for years. Maybe there will be day that no one is above the law actually be true.

  3. mach37

    April 19, 2022 at 6:25 pm

    Another example of weak words used against Democrats! Surely Durham could have found a clearer, stronger word expression than “user-created”! Conservatives have got to learn to be more forceful while still sounding intelligent.

  4. Carolyn Matzura

    April 19, 2022 at 10:24 pm

    So the attorney is guilty and the client that hired him to do this scam, is not? Talk about one sided law and corruption. This is the maximum.

  5. jimmy rooks

    April 22, 2022 at 6:53 am

    Unless & until Shrillary is placed under arrest for HER clear crimes against the American people, I have NO interest!

  6. James

    April 22, 2022 at 9:44 am

    Hillary Clinton servers were they hacked before being relocated to New York ? Yes absolutely if you file under the fioa you will find Obama campaign servers were hacked into likewise Hillary servers were as well . The country of interest at the time secret service was lead on the investigation was of course China . Did the Hillary campaign know ? Yes they did so more questions crop up on the decision to transfer the servers makes people wonder just what was on the servers ? Also please look into this I accessed and read the fbi report on her severs no where does it state Hillary actually attended the pre-fbi briefing on cyber security and appropriate server handling she was required to attend before or after being sworn in as Secretary of State it was a two or three hour education training by the fbi did she attend or have others attend on her behalf ? It makes a very big difference .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Biden’s 60 Minutes Interview Horrifies White House: ‘Does NOT Reflect the OFFICIAL Position’



Screen Shot 2022 09 19 at 2.41.05 PM

Uh oh. Someone let President Joe Biden speak by himself again and damage control immediately ensued. President Joe Biden’s “60 Minutes” interview which aired on CBS Sunday was 60 minutes of pure torture for viewers and 60 minutes of pure angst for the White House; everyone but the president himself.

60 Minutes’ official Twitter account publicly called out the President’s answers with an embarrassing statement that his own administration was in disagreement with him:

“President Biden tells 60 Minutes that U.S. men and women would defend Taiwan in the vent of a Chinese invasion. However, after our interview, a White House official told us that U.S. policy on Taiwan has not changed.”

CBS’ Scott Pelley also discussed inflation; an issue drastically affecting the welfare and wellbeing of families. Biden deflected with zero sympathy:

As for President Biden’s son Joe, he is sticking with the narrative that Hunter is the “smartest” person he knows and that “there’s not a single thing that I’ve observed at all that would affect me or the United States relative to my son Hunter.”

Biden also said that while the “proof of the pudding is in the eating” in response to being asked if he is fit to be President, Biden did not commit to saying whether or not he will run for re-election. His “intention” is to run again, “but that’s just intention” he said. “Is it a firm decision that I run again? That remains to be seen.”


You may like

Continue Reading

Trending Now



Proudly Made In America | © 2022 M3 Media Management, LLC