Connect with us

Elections

New Filings in Durham Report say CIA Determined Trump-Russia Hoax Data was ‘User Created’

Published

on

Screen Shot 2019 12 03 at 11.51.35 AM

Former lawyer for Clinton’s 2016 campaign, Michael Sussman, is being charged with “falsely stating to the general counsel that he was not providing the allegations to the FBI on behalf of any client” when giving false information to the FBI about a tie between then-candidate Trump and a Russian bank with ties to the Kremlin.

New filings by Durham also show he also gave false information to the CIA, having told the agency he met with the FBI, but about something “unrelated.” The information Sussman provided to both federal agencies was provided by “Tech Executive 1” identified as Rodney Joffe.

The data was used to create “an inference” and “narrative” to try and tie Trump to Russia, added Durham. In his court filing Friday, Durham added the CIA had concluded that the data Sussman gave to them was “not technically plausible” and was “user created.”

The data, gathered by Joffe, was exploited “by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump” said Durham in February.

In his filing Friday, Durham wrote he believes the government expects to “adduce evidence at trial” that will reflect that the FBI and the CIA ‘concluded that the Russian Ban 1 allegations were untrue and unsupported.”

Additionally, Durham wrote:

“For example, while the FBI did not reach an ultimate conclusion regarding the data’s accuracy or whether it might have been in whole or in part genuine, spoofed, altered, or fabricated, Agency 2 concluded in early 2017 that the Russian Bank 1 data and Russian Phone Provider 1 data was not ‘technically plausible,’ did not ‘withstand technical scrutiny,’ ‘contained gaps,’ ‘conflicted with [itself],’ and was ‘user created and not machine/tool generated.”

 

Continue Reading
6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. ScienceABC123

    April 18, 2022 at 11:55 am

    So the Mueller investigation was a fraud from start to finish. Nothing but a waste of taxpayer dollars, and some very important people knew it all along…

  2. Donna Taylor

    April 19, 2022 at 5:40 pm

    Hillary has evaded jail time for years. Maybe there will be day that no one is above the law actually be true.

  3. mach37

    April 19, 2022 at 6:25 pm

    Another example of weak words used against Democrats! Surely Durham could have found a clearer, stronger word expression than “user-created”! Conservatives have got to learn to be more forceful while still sounding intelligent.

  4. Carolyn Matzura

    April 19, 2022 at 10:24 pm

    So the attorney is guilty and the client that hired him to do this scam, is not? Talk about one sided law and corruption. This is the maximum.

  5. jimmy rooks

    April 22, 2022 at 6:53 am

    Unless & until Shrillary is placed under arrest for HER clear crimes against the American people, I have NO interest!

  6. James

    April 22, 2022 at 9:44 am

    Hillary Clinton servers were they hacked before being relocated to New York ? Yes absolutely if you file under the fioa you will find Obama campaign servers were hacked into likewise Hillary servers were as well . The country of interest at the time secret service was lead on the investigation was of course China . Did the Hillary campaign know ? Yes they did so more questions crop up on the decision to transfer the servers makes people wonder just what was on the servers ? Also please look into this I accessed and read the fbi report on her severs no where does it state Hillary actually attended the pre-fbi briefing on cyber security and appropriate server handling she was required to attend before or after being sworn in as Secretary of State it was a two or three hour education training by the fbi did she attend or have others attend on her behalf ? It makes a very big difference .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Elections

BREAKING: Hunter Biden Found Guilty on All Three Felony Charges

Published

on

hunter biden

Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, was found guilty on all three felony charges on Tuesday. After a six-day trial, a jury concluded that the first son lied on a federal gun-purchase background-check form by falsely claiming he was not a drug addict. The jury deliberated for three hours, starting Monday afternoon following the conclusion of closing arguments.

Hunter Biden was convicted on two charges for lying about his crack-cocaine addiction on federal gun paperwork when he purchased a Colt Cobra revolver on October 12, 2018. Additionally, he was found guilty of a third charge for possessing the firearm while addicted to crack cocaine.

According to National Review, the criminal trial exposed deep rifts within the Biden family. Hunter’s ex-wife, Kathleen Buhle, and his deceased brother Beau Biden’s widow, Hallie Biden, testified against him. This created an emotional divide within the family, especially when Naomi Biden, the eldest daughter of Buhle and Hunter, testified for the defense, pitting mother against daughter.

Federal prosecutors Derek Hines and Leo Wise led the case against Hunter Biden as part of special counsel David Weiss’s legal team. Throughout the trial, Weiss was present in the courtroom, often seen conversing and eating chocolates during breaks.

Prosecutors presented what they described as “overwhelming evidence” of Hunter Biden’s drug addiction at the time he completed the gun purchase. This evidence included witness testimony, text messages, videos, images, bank records, and excerpts from Hunter’s memoir. Key testimonies from Hallie Biden, gun salesman Gordon Cleveland, and ex-girlfriend Zoe Kestan were crucial in establishing Hunter Biden’s pattern of drug use and his decision to lie about his addiction.

Defense attorney Abbe Lowell argued that Hunter Biden’s behavior had improved around the time of the gun purchase, asserting that he did not “knowingly” lie on the federal paperwork. However, the testimonies of Kestan and Cleveland, along with Hunter Biden’s own admissions of drug use in texts and memoir excerpts, posed significant challenges to the defense’s narrative.

Throughout the trial, Lowell conducted extensive cross-examinations of the prosecution’s witnesses and disputed the context of the evidence presented. However, Leo Wise’s cross-examination of Naomi Biden, where he scrutinized her text messages with her father from October 2018, proved to be a pivotal moment, undermining her defense testimony.

Before the verdict, President Biden stated he would respect the jury’s decision and would not pardon his son if convicted. At the trial’s onset, President Biden issued a statement expressing pride in his son’s efforts to overcome his drug addiction.

Hunter Biden is scheduled to face another trial in September on nine federal tax charges related to his alleged failure to pay over $1.4 million in taxes over four years.

Continue Reading

Trending