Connect with us


MYSTERY: Texas cows found mutilated with tongues surgically removed




The world just got a little weirder after numerous cattle in Texas were discovered dead in three different counties with their tongues surgically removed.

The cause of death of the six cows discovered is still unknown, according to the Madison County sheriff’s office. The Sheriffs office said that each cattle belonged to a different herd and were found all in different pastures. According to reports, five of the grass grazing beasts were adults and only one was a yearling.

It wasn’t enough to just remove the tongue of two of the cattle for whatever monster committed this act, it also removed the genitalia and anuses with a circular cut. The sheriff’s office noted that the circular cut was made with the “same precision as the cuts noted around the jaw lines of each cow,” according to officials.


Photography by Bryan Riel

After authorities were alerted of the first deceased beast – a 6 year-old longhorn-cross cow –  investigators soon discovered the other five animals.

If this case wasn’t mysterious enough, there appeared to be absolutely zero signs of struggle with the cattle, the grass in the area where the cattle was discovered was undisturbed, and there were no footprints or tracks from the tread of a tire at the scene.


“Ranchers also reported that no predators or birds would scavenge the remains of the cow, leaving it to decay untouched for several weeks,” according to the sheriff’s office.

This is not the first time that the United States has had incidents like this occur. Just between April and October of 1975, there were roughly 200 cases of cattle mutilation in just the state of Colorado alone, according to the History Channel. These cases of bovine mutilation were eerily similar to those that just occurred in which the gentle giants were left with their carcasses drained and their ears, eyes, anuses, udders, genitalia, and tongues all removed with precision blade work.


Photography by Bryan Riel


Furthermore a New Mexico state police officer, Gabe Valdez, investigated many cases of cattle mutilation throughout the years until his death in 2011. In one case from 1976, Valdez came upon evidence that a triangular shaped vehicle/object of some sort landed in a field in where, tripod’s exited the the object and followed a cow for nearly 600 feet until the animal dropped dead and the tripods carried onto mutilate the cow. In the case just as the mutilations in Colorado and now Texas, the genitalia and anuses were also removed.

Ufo’s? Maybe a secret government project? Cults? To this day there have been many theories to the mutilations of these animals but none seem to hold strong and no answer has held enough weight to definitively know the cause and purpose for these deaths.

With the increased ufo activity seen across the globe recently, it would be ignorant to leave out the possibility that this might be something much larger then our understanding of the current world.

You can follow Alexander D. Carter on Twitter @AlexCarterDC 



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


TX farmers fight to block USDA from using race in distributing farm aid



GettyImages 2059551148 scaled

“When natural disasters strike, they don’t discriminate based on race and sex. Neither should the Department of Agriculture.” That’s the message from a group of farmers written in a court filing made public Monday.

Just The News reports on a group of white farmers in Texas who are asking a federal judge to block the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from using race, gender or other “socially disadvantaged” traits to determine who gets disaster and pandemic farm aid and how much, arguing the agency’s current administration of eight emergency funding programs is unconstitutionally discriminatory.

According to Just the News, the USDA’s program appears to be rooted in an executive order that President Joe Biden signed. The lawsuit names the USDA and Biden Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. The farmers bringing the action include Rusty Strickland, Alan and Amy West and Bryan Baker, all of Texas.

The farmers, represented by the nonprofit legal firm called the Southeastern Legal Foundation, asked a judge to issue an emergency injunction from the U.S. District Court in Amarillo, Texas, to stop any additional awards from being made on the basis of race and gender or other liberal standards.

“Enjoining USDA from using race, sex, or progressive factoring when administering the programs is warranted because Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that: (1) the programs, as currently administered, are unconstitutional; (2) USDA lacks statutory authority to run the programs in their current form; and (3) USDA failed to adequately explain changes in calculating payments when implementing progressive factoring,” the motion stated.

The farmers said the Biden administration has taken roughly $25 billion in disaster and pandemic aid approved by Congress for farmers in eight programs and devised a system to make awards based on race, gender or other “socially disadvantaged” traits. Such decision-making violates the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedures Act.

“The Constitution promises equal treatment to all Americans regardless of their race or sex,” the court filing also reads. “It also promises the separation of powers. USDA broke both promises through the disaster and pandemic relief programs challenged here.”

The farmers said they can prove that “USDA gives more money to some farmers based on” race, gender or other factors never approved by Congress.

“USDA does this by first defining farmers who are black/African-American, American Indian, Alaskan native, Hispanic, Asian-American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, or a woman as ‘socially disadvantaged,’” the court filing said. “Then, it provides farmers who qualify as socially disadvantaged more money for the same loss than those it deems non-underserved, along with other preferential treatment”

Just the News explains the request for an injunction relies in part of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision last year banning racial preferences in college admissions. It even quoted from the high court’s declaration that “eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it.”.

“Disasters don’t discriminate and neither should USDA. In fact, the Constitution prohibits it,” the lawyers said in a statement. “That is why our brave clients – a group of Texas farmers that includes three white men who received significantly less money in disaster relief funds from USDA than if they had been of a different race or sex – filed this case and are asking the court to stop USDA’s blatant discrimination.”

Continue Reading