Connect with us

Nation

MSNBC host with TDS, Joy Reid insinuates Trump faked his COVID-19 diagnosis

Published

on

Screen Shot 2020 08 28 at 10.44.44 AM

MSNBC liberal talk show host Joy Reid suggested Friday that President Donald Trump lied about his COVID-19 diagnosis just to “get out of the debates.”

Reid has always been a propagandist never Trumper but she knows better than making up this kind of disgusting lie because of course her pseudo news network had already confirmed the diagnosis.

Reid is an embarrassment. She is driven by her hatred for Trump and frankly, anyone who disagrees with her point of view. Unfortunately, there are a lot of “Reids” out there.

Here’s how wrecked Trump’s credibility is at this point: I’ve got a cellphone full of texts from people who aren’t sure whether to believe Trump actually has covid, Joy Reid

The President and First Lady Melania Trump announced that they had contracted the coronavirus onThursday. Now, a growing number of senior U.S. lawmakers and officials, many who attended the Rose Garden’s announcement that Justice Amy Coney Barrett would be replacing the late Justice Ginsburg, have tested positive for the virus.

It was only hours before Trump was being taken Walter Reed Medical Center, Reid, whose show “ReidOut” is a left wing echo chamber of those infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome, shared the gossip her and her friends shared on text messages on Twitter.

“Here’s how wrecked Trump’s credibility is at this point: I’ve got a cellphone full of texts from people who aren’t sure whether to believe Trump actually has covid. ‘He lies so much,’ one friend just texted. ‘Is he just doing this to get out of the debates?’ others are texting,” tweeted Reid on Friday.

You can follow Sara A. Carter on Twitter @SaraCarterDC.

You may like

Continue Reading

Nation

Virginia Public Schools Reinstates Two Books Despite Complaints of Pedophilia and Pornography

Published

on

Fairfax

Fairfax County Public Schools has reinstated two books despite complaints from parents that the literature depicted and legitimized obscene and pedophilic material. Parents confronted the school board with the graphic images contained in the books beginning in September. Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) announced the books were restored to libraries after two committees reviewed them.

The books, “Lawn Boy” and “Gender Queer” have been determined by the District as helpful to the LGBTQ community. Fox News reports “Lawn Boy” by Jonathan Evison includes long sections of a boy reminiscing about explicit experiences he had at 10 years old. “Gender Queer: A Memoir” is by Maia Kobabe and includes photos of sexual acts between a boy and a man.

Virginia mother and president of Parents Defending Education, Nicole Nelly, told Fox News last week, “It’s appalling that Fairfax County’s response to parental feedback is to quibble over the definition of ‘pedophilia’ and to shame and denigrate families who are concerned about this material.”

“By attempting to normalize this content – and reinstating these books under cover of darkness right before Thanksgiving break – FCPS has demonstrated that in their eyes, parental input is a bug, not a feature, in the system” added Nelly.

In an interview with Fox News, Stacy Langton, one of the mothers who first confronted the school board, says “plenty” of Democrats and liberals are also calling her to say they “don’t want their kids exposed to this in school…this is FCPS coming out and explicitly saying they are in favor of porn in schools for your children.”

FCPS, however, claims that two committees comprised of school administrators, librarians, parents, and students determined that the books did not contain pedophilia, nor did they violate regulations by including obscene material.

“The decision reaffirms FCPS’s ongoing commitment to provide diverse reading materials that reflect on our student population, allowing every child an opportunity to see themselves reflected in literary characters” said FCPS in a released statement.

“Both reviews concluded that the books were valuable in their potential to reach marginalized youth who may struggle to find relatable literary characters that reflect their personal journeys” the statement continued.

Michael Sabbeth, Colorado attorney and author of “The Good, The Bad & The Difference: How to Talk With Children About Values” says “the Board’s assertion cleverly employs a logical fallacy—a strawman argument.”

While the board’s “refutation alleges the material affirms students with ‘marginalized identities’ and acknowledges the ‘difficulties nonbinary and asexual individuals may face’, their justification ignores and fails to negate allegations of obscenity, pornography and or pedophilia” states Sabbeth.

“Ironically, the Board’s justification demeans those it alleges to support. If, for example, pedophilia is in a book, arguing it helps youngsters is morally beneath contempt. To virtuously support those individuals, the Board need do no more than advance this unambiguous message: Treat all people respectfully” Sabbeth concludes.

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending