Connect with us


McEnany Slams Chicago Mayor For Calling Her A ‘Karen’



Screenshot 2020 05 20 15.41.10

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany slammed Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who called her a ‘Karen’ Thursday, suggesting she’s been neglecting the ongoing violence in her city and should spend less time attempting to insult her on Twitter.

“While you’re focused on words, America is outraged by the violence perpetuated in our city,” McEnany wrote on Twitter in response to Lightfoot’s accusation. “One person is taking action to stop violence in our streets: President @realDonaldTrump. He’s offered your city help. It’s a dereliction of duty not to take it.”

The term ‘karen’ is used to describe a “rude, obnoxious and insufferable middle aged white women,” according to Urban Dictionary.

Lightfoot used the ‘Karen’ label after McEnany called her “the derelict mayor of Chicago” and highlighted the Trump Administration’s offers to aid her city. has been following the violence in the city for weeks. And, the COVID lockdowns and the riots in the wake of the tragic death of George Floyd, have only made matters worse.

Over Father’s Day weekend, 102 people were shot, and, over 79 people were shot over the Fourth of July holiday weekend in the City.

Continue Reading


BREAKING: Trump ordered to pay over $350M, barred from operating his business in NY in civil fraud case ruling



Former President Donald Trump and his business empire faced a significant setback as a New York judge ruled against them in a civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The 92-page ruling, handed down by Judge Arthur Engoron, barred Trump from operating his business in New York for three years and imposed over $350 million in damages.

The case, which unfolded over months of trial proceedings, stemmed from allegations that Trump inflated his assets and engaged in fraudulent practices. Engoron’s ruling cited a litany of charges, including persistent fraud, falsifying records, issuing false financial statements, and conspiracy to commit fraud.

Moreover, the judge imposed restrictions on key figures within the Trump Organization, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, barring them from serving in certain corporate roles in New York for a specified period.

Engoron’s scathing assessment of Trump’s testimony during the trial further undermined the former president’s credibility. The judge criticized Trump for evasive responses and irrelevant digressions, highlighting the detrimental effect on his credibility.

In response to the ruling, Trump’s attorney, Christopher Kise, lambasted the court’s decision, alleging political bias and a disregard for established legal principles. Kise argued that the evidence presented during the trial failed to support the allegations of fraud and emphasized Trump’s substantial net worth.

Kise’s assertions were echoed by Alina Habba, another attorney representing Trump, who denounced the verdict as a “manifest injustice” resulting from a politically motivated witch hunt.

Throughout the proceedings, Trump consistently dismissed the trial as politically motivated, accusing both Engoron and James of partisan bias. His legal team also criticized the absence of a jury in the trial, questioning the fairness of the proceedings.

Attorney General Letitia James, who spearheaded the lawsuit against Trump and his organization, portrayed the ruling as a victory for accountability and transparency in business practices. The lawsuit alleged fraudulent conduct and sought substantial financial penalties, a portion of which would contribute to the state treasury.

The fallout from the case extends beyond Trump and his business interests, with implications for the broader business community and the rule of law. The contentious nature of the trial and its outcome underscored deep divisions and raised questions about the integrity of the legal system.

Trump vows to appeal the decision.

Continue Reading