Connect with us

Economy

McConnell blocks Senate vote on $2K checks, hints at new package

Published

on

Screenshot 2019 12 19 09.51.51

On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) blocked a Democratic effort to bring legislation that the House passed Monday to increase the money in stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000, despite President Donald Trump and others demanding this change to checks.

Congress, after months of negotiations, had agreed on the tinier $600 checks to individual Americans as part of a compromise to push through the massive end-of-the-year COVID-19 relief bill that Trump hesitantly signed into law on Sunday. Trump, however, is pushing for Congress to increase the amount of money in these checks to $2,000.

RELATED: Trump Signs Covid-19 Bill: Announces Congress Review of Section 230

The Kentucky Republican, who has spoken little publicly about Trump’s demands, did not directly explain why he objected, but under the Senate’s rules, any single senator can stonewall attempts to schedule votes or pass legislation. Additionally, the Republican leader offered little to no indication of his plans going forward.

“The Senate will begin a process,” McConnell said Tuesday, also saying he intends to bring Trump’s demand for the $2,000 checks and other issues left on the table “into focus.”

A growing list of Republicans, including the two Georgia senators facing contentious runoff elections on January 5 in the Peach State, have stated they will support the enlarged checks.

“I’m delighted to support the president,” said Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) on Fox News about Trump’s calls for $2,000 checks. In another interview on Fox, Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) expressed that she also supports this move.

Most Republican senators, nonetheless, still object to increased spending.

Tuesday morning before the Senate’s session, the president reemphasized his demands, tweeting: “$2000 for our great people, not $600!”

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1343916418316824583

Both Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) attempted to get consent for the Senate to bring the legislation passed by the House on Monday up for a vote.

“We should not adjourn until the Senate holds a vote,” Schumer said, while making a motion to push the legislation toward a vote.

Moreover, Sanders, who’s leading a group of progressive senators who support the increased money in checks, will filibuster a vote to override Trump’s defense bill veto unless the Senate holds a vote on sending $2,000 checks to individual Americans.

“McConnell and the Senate want to expedite the override vote and I understand that. But I’m not going to allow that to happen unless there is a vote, no matter how long that takes, on the $2,000 direct payment,” Sanders said in a Monday night interview.

The democratic socialist from Vermont ultimately cannot prevent the vote to override the veto on the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). He can, however, stall it until January 1, making life harder for Republicans.

Separately, McConnell hinted that in a package he could bundle the $2,000 checks with a repeal of Section 230, which gives social media companies like Twitter and Facebook liability protections. When Trump signed the $2.3 trillion COVID-19 relief package on Sunday, he said the Senate would “start the process for a vote” that deals with the trio of issues.

“During this process, the president highlighted three additional issues of national significance he would like to see Congress tackle together,” McConnell said Tuesday.

“Those are the three important subjects the president has linked together. This week the Senate will begin a process to bring these three priorities into focus,” he added.

You can follow Douglas Braff on Twitter @Douglas_P_Braff.

You may like

Continue Reading

Nation

White House Confirms It Is Looking Into Shutting Down Oil Pipeline Amid Fuel Crisis

Published

on

Gas Pipeline

The Biden administration confirmed that it is considering shutting down an oil pipeline in Michigan despite the ongoing fuel crisis in the country.

“Revoking the permits for the [Line 5] pipeline that delivers oil from western Canada across Wisconsin, the Great Lakes and Michigan and into Ontario, would please environmentalists who have urged the White House to block fossil fuel infrastructure, but it would aggravate a rift with Canada and could exacerbate a spike in energy prices that Republicans are already using as a political weapon,” Politico Pro reported. “Killing a pipeline while U.S. gasoline prices are the highest in years could be political poison for Biden, who has seen his approval rating crash in recent months.”

Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked about the report during Monday’s press briefing, asking, “why is the administration now considering shutting down the Line 5 pipeline from Canada to Michigan?”

“So, Peter, that is inaccurate,” Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre claimed. “That is not right. So, any reporting indicating that some decision has been made, again, is not accurate. … So, again, I would — it is inaccurate what you just stated, but —”

“What’s inaccurate?” Doocy asked.

“The reporting about us wanting to shut down the Line 5,” Jean-Pierre said.

“I didn’t say ‘wanting.’  I said, is it being studied right now?  Is the administration studying the impact of shutting down the Line 5?”

“Yeah. Yes, we are. We are,” Jean-Pierre admitted.

 

The news comes as gas prices have reached their highest since 2014, when Biden was vice president, and are currently about 50% higher than they were when Biden entered office.

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending