In a legal saga that continues to unfold, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg finds himself embroiled in multiple lawsuits over his failure to comply with Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) requests.

The focus of these requests pertains to potential communication between Bragg’s office and the Justice Department, White House, and Democratic lawmakers concerning the highly publicized prosecution of former President Donald J Trump.

Bragg made headlines in March when he indicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The charges stem from a thorough investigation into hush-money payments made during Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Alleging that Trump sought to conceal damaging information and engage in unlawful activities, Bragg’s indictment signaled a significant step in the legal scrutiny faced by the former president.

However, the spotlight has now turned to Bragg himself, as the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, filed two lawsuits against him. According to reports from Fox News, the lawsuits claim that Bragg’s office potentially coordinated or communicated with the Justice Department, the White House, and Democratic Representative Daniel Goldman, leading to investigations by various U.S. House committees into Bragg’s conduct.

In its legal filings, The Heritage Foundation expresses concern over the lack of answers to their inquiries, raising suspicions about the potential weaponization of the criminal justice system against Trump. The foundation alleges a pattern of coordination among Trump’s political opponents and requests the court to classify the requested documents as subject to release under New York’s FOIL laws. Additionally, they seek to compel Bragg and his team to provide the documents while preventing them from seeking costs and fees related to the FOIL requests.

According to The Heritage Foundation, Bragg’s office has been largely uncooperative, withholding crucial communications between suspected parties. They argue that these communications should be accessible under New York’s FOIL laws. Mike Howell, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project, asserts that Bragg may have been actively coordinating or communicating with Trump’s political opposition, highlighting concerns about potential bias in the prosecution.

Critics accuse Bragg of hypocrisy, citing his lack of transparency and willingness to obstruct and delay the release of documents. The foundation argues that while Bragg pursues a prosecution against Trump based on what they consider a flimsy theory about document retention, he himself has failed to uphold the same standards. This has raised questions about a potential dual standard of justice at play.

The outcome of these lawsuits could have broader implications for the transparency and accountability of prosecutors in high-profile cases, and may shed light on the delicate balance between political motivations and the pursuit of justice.

Follow Alexander Carter on Twitter @AlexCarterDC for more!