Connect with us


Lemon who lost PRIME TIME, Says Nikki Hailey is not in her ‘PRIME’



don lemon white men cnn

CNN anchor Don Lemon commented on Former South Carolina Governor and former US ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Hailey saying that she was “not in her prime.”

This comment comes after Hailey held her first official rally for her bid in the Presidential election. It was at the rally when she made her own controversial comment saying there should be “competency tests for politician 75 years and older.” Hailey’s platform is based on putting politicians in office that are younger and haven’t been as exposed to Washington D.C.’s so-called ‘swamp.’  She also said there should be term limits in congress and the senate.

But Lemon’s female co-anchors shot back at his comments.

Poppy Harlow, perplexed by Lemon’s comment, immediately responded to him saying, “Prime for what?”

She glared at Lemon, who was then trying to defend his misogynistic statements but kept digging a deeper hole.

He attempted to back track his statement and said, “It just depends, prime of you look it up,” Lemon continued to say “if you google when is a woman in her prime, it’ll say 20’s, 30’s and 40’s.”

At a young age children are taught the old adage in school to not trust everything you search on the internet and this obviously didn’t stick with Lemon.

This also beckons the question, why is Don Lemon google searching women in there prime? Lemon has already lost his primetime slot with CNN and if he continues with these types of remarks it wouldn’t be surprising if he gets canned altogether.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


BREAKING: Senate votes down both articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in party-line vote




The Senate voted down two articles of impeachment Wednesday which alleged Department of Homeland Security Secretary  Alejandro Mayorkas engaged in the “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” regarding the southern border in his capacity as DHS secretary. The second claimed Mayorkas had breached public trust.

What resulted in a party-line vote, began with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., proposing a point of order declaring the first article unconstitutional, to which the majority of senators agreed following several failed motions by Republicans. The article was deemed unconstitutional by a vote of 51-48, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting present.

Fox News reports:

Schumer’s point of order was proposed after his request for unanimous consent, which would have provided a set amount of time for debate among the senators, as well as votes on two GOP resolutions and a set amount of agreed upon points of order, was objected to by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

Schmitt stated in his objection that the Senate should conduct a full trial into the impeachment articles against Mayorkas, rather than the debate and points of order suggested by Schumer’s unanimous consent request, which would be followed by a likely successful motion to dismiss the articles. 

Republican senators took issue with Schumer’s point of order, as agreeing to it would effectively kill the first of the two articles. Several GOP lawmakers proposed motions, which took precedence over the point of order, to adjourn or table the point, among other things. But all GOP motions failed. 

After another batch of motions to avoid voting on Schumer’s second point of order, which would deem the second article unconstitutional, the Senate agreed to it. The vote was along party lines 51-49, with Murkowski rejoining the Republicans. 

Continue Reading