Connect with us


Lemon who lost PRIME TIME, Says Nikki Hailey is not in her ‘PRIME’



don lemon white men cnn

CNN anchor Don Lemon commented on Former South Carolina Governor and former US ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki Hailey saying that she was “not in her prime.”

This comment comes after Hailey held her first official rally for her bid in the Presidential election. It was at the rally when she made her own controversial comment saying there should be “competency tests for politician 75 years and older.” Hailey’s platform is based on putting politicians in office that are younger and haven’t been as exposed to Washington D.C.’s so-called ‘swamp.’  She also said there should be term limits in congress and the senate.

But Lemon’s female co-anchors shot back at his comments.

Poppy Harlow, perplexed by Lemon’s comment, immediately responded to him saying, “Prime for what?”

She glared at Lemon, who was then trying to defend his misogynistic statements but kept digging a deeper hole.

He attempted to back track his statement and said, “It just depends, prime of you look it up,” Lemon continued to say “if you google when is a woman in her prime, it’ll say 20’s, 30’s and 40’s.”

At a young age children are taught the old adage in school to not trust everything you search on the internet and this obviously didn’t stick with Lemon.

This also beckons the question, why is Don Lemon google searching women in there prime? Lemon has already lost his primetime slot with CNN and if he continues with these types of remarks it wouldn’t be surprising if he gets canned altogether.

You may like

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Biden Administration Proposes Rule to Fortify Federal Bureaucracy Against Republican Presidency



Joe Biden

In a strategic move, the Biden administration has unveiled a proposed rule aimed at reinforcing the left-leaning federal bureaucracy, potentially hindering future conservative policy implementations by Republican presidents. This move has raised concerns about the efficacy of democratic elections when a deep-seated bureaucracy remains largely unchanged, regardless of electoral outcomes.

Key points of the situation include:

Presidential Appointees vs. Career Bureaucrats: Of the 2.2 million federal civil workers, only 4,000 are presidential appointees. The vast majority, made up of career bureaucrats, continue in their roles from one administration to the next. This continuity is facilitated by rules that make it exceedingly difficult to discipline or replace them, resulting in a bureaucracy that tends to lean left politically.

Union Political Affiliation: A striking 95% of unionized federal employees who donate to political candidates support Democrats, according to Open Secrets, with only 5% favoring Republicans. This significant political skew among federal workers raises questions about the potential for political bias in the execution of government policies.

Obstructionism and Challenges for GOP Presidents: Some career bureaucrats have been accused of obstructing Republican presidents’ agendas, leading to policy delays and challenges. For example, during the Trump administration, career lawyers in the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division declined to challenge Yale University’s discrimination against Asian American applicants, prompting Trump to seek legal counsel from other divisions. The case was subsequently dropped when Joe Biden took office.

Biden’s Countermeasures: President Biden has taken steps to protect the bureaucracy’s status quo. In October 2020, Trump issued an executive order aiming to reclassify federal workers who make policy as at-will employees, but Biden canceled it upon taking office.

Proposed Rule and Congressional Actions: The rule unveiled by the Biden administration seeks to further impede a president’s ability to reinstate Trump’s order. Additionally, some Democrats in Congress are pushing to eliminate the president’s authority to reclassify jobs entirely. This has been referred to as an attempt to “Trump-proof the federal workforce.”

Republican Candidates’ Pledge: GOP candidates such as President Donald J Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Ron DeSantis have pledged to address this issue. According to reports from Fox News, Ramaswamy has gone further, advocating for the elimination of half or more of civil service positions, emphasizing the need for accountability.

Debate on the Merit of the Civil Service: While Democrats and their media allies argue that civil service protects merit over patronage, critics contend that the system has evolved into a form of job security for federal workers with minimal accountability. Federal employees often receive higher salaries and more substantial benefits than their private-sector counterparts.

In summary, the Biden administration’s proposed rule and broader actions to protect the federal bureaucracy have sparked a debate over the role of career bureaucrats in shaping government policy.

Republican candidates are vowing to address these concerns, highlighting the need for accountability and ensuring that government agencies work in alignment with the elected president’s agenda. This ongoing debate raises important questions about the relationship between the bureaucracy and the democratic process in the United States.

Information in this article was retrieved from Fox News.

You may like

Continue Reading