International
Kamala Harris agrees with anti-Israel protester at rally who accused Israel of genocide: ‘it’s real’
Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris drew attention after engaging with an anti-Israel protester during a closed-door campaign event at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee on Thursday. The protester, who accused Israel of genocide, interrupted Harris’s talk to a group of students. While the event was closed to journalists, the exchange was captured on video and first reported by Fox News.
Just The News reports on the exchange during which the protester, wearing a keffiyeh, challenged Harris on Israel’s actions in the ongoing conflict. While the initial comment was not captured on the video, Harris’s response was.
“I know what you’re speaking of. I want a cease-fire. I want the hostage deal done. I want the war to end,” Harris responded.
“But what about the genocide? What about the genocide though?” the protester called out.
Harris maintained composure, replying, “I respect your right to speak, but I’m speaking right now,” as much of the audience cheered. Before the protester was removed, he continued, shouting, “How about the billions of dollars to Israel? What about the 19,000 children dead, and you won’t call it a genocide?”
After the protester’s removal, Harris addressed the room, seemingly acknowledging his concerns. “Listen, what he’s talking about, it’s real. That’s not the subject that I came to discuss today, but it’s real, and I respect his voice.”
The exchange quickly garnered backlash, particularly from David Friedman, former U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Trump administration. Speaking to the New York Post, Friedman criticized Harris, stating that “Kamala Harris just publicly validated the false and vicious accusation that Israel is engaging in genocide.”
Friedman went on to say, “Many, including myself, always suspected that she held this warped, antisemitic view of Israel’s self-defense against Hamas barbarism. But the cat is now out of the bag.”
He further argued that her comments disqualify her from holding public office, stating, “Her view is as ignorant as it is malign. … To give credence publicly to this disgusting blood libel disqualifies Harris from holding any public office, let alone the presidency.”
In response to the controversy, a spokesperson for Harris’s campaign simply responded that “That is not the view of the Biden-Harris Administration or the Vice President.”
Follow Steve Postal: @HebraicMosaic
———
What would a new Trump administration mean for the Middle East? Expect the following:
Increased Pressure on Iran and its Proxies
Brian Hook, Trump’s former special envoy to Iran who is believed to be leading Trump’s transition team for the State Department, stated that the new Trump administration would seek to “…isolate Iran diplomatically and weaken them economically, so that they can’t fund all of the violence…” coming from Iran’s proxies, “…all of whom destabilize Israel and our Gulf partners.” This approach contrasts with the Biden-Harris administration, who engaged the Islamic Republic diplomatically and economically, and even removed the Houthis from the Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) entity list from February 2021 through January 2024. That being said, Hook also stated that the new Trump administration would have “no interest in regime change” in Iran, and that decisions about the future of Iran lies with its people.
The Trump administration may green light an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites. GOP spokeswoman Elizabeth Pipko refused to say whether President-elect Trump would approve of Israel attacking Iran’s nuclear sites, stating that Trump should speak for himself on this issue and will do so when he assumes office. However, Trump had stated in October that Israel should strike Iran’s nuclear sites. In contrast, the Biden-Harris administration vocally opposed Israel attacking Iran’s nuclear sites or oil fields, and Israel’s attack plans were leaked to Iran through someone in the Biden-Harris administration’s Defense department.
Striving to End Wars in Lebanon and Gaza
According to Pipko, President-elect Trump wants Israel to end the wars in Gaza and Lebanon quickly, decisively, and with victory. Pipko contrasted this approach with the Biden-Harris administration’s “back and forth” policy, and that the Biden-Harris administration was pressuring how Israel conducts war based on election considerations. The Biden-Harris administration was guilty of “armchair quarterbacking” Israel’s wars in an unproductive way, including by leaking Israel’s plans to strike Lebanon, opposing the Rafah invasion, and opposing the killing of several arch-terrorists.
Trump will also likely prioritize the release of the hostages; Trump recently threatened Hamas, stating that if they did not free its hostages before inauguration day, it will pay “a very big price.” In contrast, the Biden-Harris administration has been spinning its wheels in endless failed diplomacy with Qatar, having not produced a hostage deal with Hamas since November 2023.
Pursuing a Conditional Peace with Palestinians
President-elect Donald Trump will likely re-visit his 2020 peace plan between Israel and the Palestinians, according to Brian Hook. Regarding the 2020 plan, Hook stated that “much of that work is still relevant today.”
On the issue of a Palestinian state, expect that the Trump administration won’t pursue a Palestinian state unconditionally for its own sake, as the Biden-Harris administration has. Hook conceded that Trump’s 2020 plan, which was endorsed by Israel and U.S.’ allies in the Gulf, “had a path to a two-state solution.” But Hook also recognized that Israelis are not focused on a Palestinian state now, and are instead focused on protecting themselves from terrorism in the wake of the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel.
Additionally, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas outright rejected the 2020 plan, and the plan also required the PA to provide security guarantees for Israel, recognize Israel, and allow Israeli citizens to remain in Judea and Samaria, all of which the PA did not agree to. If the new Trump administration seeks to revive this plan, it will likely revive these conditions for a Palestinian state as well. The PA will then in turn likely reject it a second time, proving again that the PA is not a partner for peace.
Expanding the Abraham Accords
President-elect Trump is also poised to expand the Abraham Accords. Trump brokered normalization deals between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan. Reportedly, the previous Trump administration was on the verge of expanding the Abraham Accords to Indonesia and Mauritania, but were prevented from doing so once the administration’s term expired. During the past Trump administration, Saudi Arabia had been trying to get Pakistan to join the Abraham Accords as well.
In contrast, the Biden-Harris administration failed to add any countries to the Abraham Accords. Most notably is the administration’s failure to clinch an Israel-Saudi Arabia deal after chilling US relations with Saudi Arabiaand insisting on a Palestinian state as an integral part of any deal. The Biden-Harris administration seems content with now pursuing a bilateral US-Saudi deal that ices out Israel, which would completely undermine the spirit of the Abraham Accords.
Jared Kushner has had multiple discussions with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on the issue of US-Israel-Saudi relations since President-elect Trump left office. So given past efforts, the new Trump administration could clinch Abraham Accords deals with Indonesia, Mauritania, Oman, and/or the big prize, Saudi Arabia.
-
Nation5 days agoSatanic Temple Offers Religious Ed Program to Ohio Elementary During School Hours
-
Nation7 days agoTrump Assassination Attempt Hearing Turns Into Screaming Match
-
Nation2 days ago‘Defund the Police’ Activist Pleads For Help After U-HauI Truck Stolen
-
Nation3 days agoNYC Mayor Adams Says He is Looking to Bypass The City’s Sanctuary Laws to Help Trump Deport Illegals (VIDEO)
