Connect with us

COVID-19

Justin Trudeau said ‘Admires China’ for ‘Basic Dictatorship’ in 2013 Fundraiser

Published

on

GettyImages 1354093065 scaled

A comment made by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2013 may explain his true sentiments and his actions against the Freedom Convoy fighting back against vaccine mandates.

Trudeau actually admitted a “level of admiration for China” because of their “basic dictatorship.”

At a “ladies night” fundraiser in Toronto, the then-up-and-coming politician was asked about a nation and administration he admired most in the entire world. His answer? Communist China. “There is a level of admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say we need to go green, we need to start, you know, investing in solar,” Justin Trudeau told the group of women.

“There is a flexibility that I know [Prime Minister] Stephen Harper must dream about: having a dictatorship where you can do whatever you wanted, that I find quite interesting.”

Just Monday, Trudeau announced he was activating an emergency power in” an effort to suppress the Freedom Convoy, a movement originally created to protest vaccination mandates for truckers crossing the US border that has morphed into a broader protest against COVID restrictions” reports Tampa Free Press.

“The blockades are harming our economy and endangering public safety,” Trudeau said in a news conference. “We cannot and will not allow illegal and dangerous activities to continue.”

Tampa Free Press notes that “by invoking Canada’s Emergencies Act—which in 1988 replaced the War Measures Act—Trudeau can use federal law enforcement to assist provincial governments and expand its search and seizure of private goods that sustain the protest movement.”

“We are making these changes because we know that these (crowdfunding) platforms are being used to support illegal blockades and illegal activity which is damaging the Canadian economy,” said Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, who used the word “terrorism” in her comments.

According to Reuters, premiers in Quebec, Manitoba, Alberta, and Saskatchewan all came out against Trudeau’s plan.

Continue Reading
10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. Dolyce Brown

    February 17, 2022 at 5:45 pm

    The terrorists that she speaks of were supported by Trudeau. He underhandedly met with the convicted terrorist Omar Khadr and gave him ten and a half million dollars of taxpayers money without and consultation or information until it was done. He also met BLM and took a knee in support of them, he accepts donations from the Tides Foundation. She needs to freeze his bank account first.

  2. edward

    February 17, 2022 at 9:23 pm

    Yeah and hitler admired mussolini too!

  3. MicMac69

    February 18, 2022 at 7:01 am

    In every globalist lies a potential dictator.
    Globalism can be achieved only by dictatorship.
    Dictatorship can be achieved by manipulating/indoctrinating the mass of electors.
    When globalism is achieved even the useful idiots are becoming useless.
    The list of nations with an elected globalist leader is everyday longer, proving that the useful idiots are on the rise.

  4. Steven Fisk

    February 18, 2022 at 1:24 pm

    Boy the rats keep coming out of the walls!

  5. Left Coast

    February 18, 2022 at 2:36 pm

    Trudope & Freeland are the offspring of far-left marx admiring zellots . . . obviously the nut didn’t fall far from the tree.

    If Trump was in the White House this likely would not have happened . . .

  6. Kleena

    February 18, 2022 at 5:14 pm

    FJT!!!

  7. Jerry Seckora

    February 18, 2022 at 8:53 pm

    They are “SCARED ANINALS” and will do anything to stay in power. PRAY they are removed before they go OFF

  8. Wade Dukes

    February 19, 2022 at 9:31 am

    I wonder how Canada has elected this metrosexual idiot into office and then stop to think that some how our great country…elected…wink…wink…Merv the Perv Biden. We have no room to laugh at Canadian voters.

  9. Stephane

    February 20, 2022 at 7:15 pm

    Shave Castro’s Beard and you have TURDeau!

  10. schutzhund

    February 21, 2022 at 6:03 am

    CCP exists…in Canada

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

COVID-19

Internal docs show Amazon censored books on vaccinations due to pressure from Biden White House

Published

on

Vaccine

Recently released internal Amazon emails reveal the company caved to pressure from the Biden White House to suppress available vaccine information.

Provided to the House Judiciary Committee, the emails light on the extent of the Biden White House’s influence over the retail giant regarding vaccine-related content. The emails disclose a concerning narrative of pressure from government officials to suppress information deemed unfavorable to their agenda.

Republican Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio took to Twitter to disclose the findings, stating that the emails reveal direct pressure from the White House on Amazon to censor books expressing views contrary to those endorsed by the administration. One email, albeit redacted, explicitly poses the question of whether the administration requested the removal of certain books, to which the answer was affirmative.

National Review highlights the successful efforts of the Biden administration in persuading Amazon to limit the visibility of titles skeptical of vaccine efficacy. White House senior adviser for Covid-19 response, Andrew Slavitt, expressed concerns about Amazon’s role in propagating what he termed as “misinformation” regarding vaccines. His emails illustrate a push for action to address what he perceived as a proliferation of dissenting views.

In response to Slavitt’s inquiries, Amazon initially hesitated to take overt action, fearing backlash from conservative media outlets. The company’s internal deliberations reflect a concern for public perception and the potential amplification of the issue if intervention were too conspicuous.

Despite initially refraining from manual intervention, Amazon eventually succumbed to pressure, engaging in discussions with White House officials. The company’s internal documents reveal deliberations on whether the administration sought outright book bans or alterations to search results. Amazon’s stance, as expressed in their meeting with the White House, emphasized the provision of diverse viewpoints and the distinction between online retail and social media platforms.

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending