Connect with us

Healthcare

Judges uphold de Blasio’s vaccine mandate for public school teachers

Published

on

Screen Shot 2021 05 24 at 9.03.00 AM scaled

[brid autoplay=”true” video=”698512″ player=”23886″ title=”moderna%20looking%20good%206%20million%20doses” duration=”24″ description=”undefined” uploaddate=”2021-01-04″ thumbnailurl=”//cdn.brid.tv/live/partners/18168/thumb/698512_t_1609803251.png” contentUrl=”//cdn.brid.tv/live/partners/18168/sd/698512.mp4″]


Federal judges ruled in favor of New York City Monday, allowing vaccine mandates among teachers. The ruling comes out of the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan.

According to NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio, 90% of public school teachers received the vaccine. But roughly 7,500 remain without a single dose of the vaccine.

Then, the city’s Department of Education lauded the ruling. “Vaccinations are our strongest tool in the fight against COVID-19 – this ruling is on the right side of the law and will protect our students and staff,” their statement read. Meanwhile, 87% of the department’s employees received the vaccine. Now, the mandate will officially go into effect on October 4th.

However unvaccinated teachers simply said, through their lawyers, that they will appeal the ruling. They would rather lose their jobs than accept the mandate, predicting that students will suffer the most without teachers.

“Imminent and irreparable harm exists,” their lawyers argued to the federal panel.

“To remain unvaccinated while teaching vulnerable schoolchildren is dwarfed by the public’s interest in safely resuming full school operations for a million public school students,” the judges’ ruling read.

According to the city’s Department of Health, the average number of shots per day has increased 45 percent since the mayor announced the mandate.

You can follow Jenny Goldsberry on Twitter @jennyjournalism.

You may like

Continue Reading

Healthcare

Nebraska woman who detransitioned sues doctors who facilitated removal of ‘healthy breasts’ when she was a teen battling mental health

Published

on

Screen Shot 2023 09 17 at 10.05.58 PM

Nebraska woman Luka Hein is suing Nebraska Medicine, the Nebraska Medical Center, and University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Physicians who facilitated in her gender transition when she was a teenager; Hein has since detransitioned.

Hein, who is being represented by the Center for American Liberty, filed the suit last week, for removal of her healthy breasts when she was a depressed teenager who struggled with mental health.

“Proceeding straight to breast amputation in a depressed, anxiety-ridden, gender-confused adolescent, who was incapable of understanding the lasting consequences of her decision, constitutes negligence for which Defendants are jointly and severally liable,” the lawsuit states.

Fox News reports:

Throughout adolescence, Hein struggled with her mental health and traumatic experiences, including being allegedly groomed and threatened by an adult man. She had serious mental-health struggles at age 13. By 15 she was diagnosed with “gender identity disorder” and put on a fast track to have her breasts removed, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit claims that despite Hein’s history, doctors rushed her into gender transition without considering her psychological comorbidities. It says the defendants used deceptive euphemisms and unscientific terminology to sell gender-transition procedures to Hein.

For instance, their use of the phrase “masculinizing hormone therapy” was misleading as the process does not heal the patient but does “inflict harm that causes malfunctioning and malformation of the teenage body and brain,” according to the lawsuit. Testosterone injections, which Hein received as part of her attempted sex change, can cause many negative side effects including high blood pressure and permanent bodily changes such as the development of an Adam’s apple, deepening of the voice, abnormal hair growth, and male pattern balding of the scalp.

The lawsuit says defendants were also negligent in other ways, such as in their shifting from a standard medical diagnosis to the “affirming care” model, which embraces a person’s gender delusion as fact and discourages questioning.

Allegedly one doctor, Nahia J. Amoura, was prepared to go even further. “About a year after starting Luka on testosterone, Dr. Amoura recommended to Luka that she surgically remove her uterus in a partial hysterectomy as the next step in her ‘transition,’” the lawsuit states. The hysterectomy would have permanently sterilized Hein and created hormonal imbalances that would have required long-term medical follow-ups.

You may like

Continue Reading

Trending