Connect with us


Jordan demands info on Biden admin’s efforts to protect property, feds in Portland



GettyImages 997227550 Jim Jordan

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) on Monday sent letters to two Cabinet members, asking for answers regarding the Biden administration’s efforts to protect federal property and personnel in Portland, Oregon from violent left-wing rioters.

In the letters to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and Attorney General Merrick Garland, Jordan pointed out, “Anarchists and violent left-wing extremists continue to vandalize and destroy federal property in Portland, Oregon.”

“The vandalism and destruction of federal and private property that began last summer in Portland,” the Ohio Republican also said, “has not stopped.”

The Daily Caller was the first to report on the pair of letters.

Following the death of George Floyd in May of last year, the city faced one hundred consecutive nights of violence. The letters noted that, earlier this month, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had to re-install fencing around the Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse days after left-wing rioters attacked and tried to set fire to the building. Jordan also mentioned other instances of violence at and vandalism to federal property.

The letters also cited journalist Andy Ngô’s February 24 testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, at which he said that “antifa and left-wing anarchists” in Portland have “developed a riot apparatus that included streams of funding for accommodation, travel, riot gear, and weapons, which resulted in a murder, hundreds of arson attacks, mass injuries, and mass property destruction.”

Jordan also noted Ngô’s warning that Congress should not be “downplaying antifa’s violent extremism.”

“The Biden administration has a duty to ensure federal law is enforced and that both federal property and federal personnel are protected and kept safe from violent extremists in Portland,” the Ohio lawmaker wrote in the letters.

Jordan’s letter to Mayorkas requested an explanation on what the DHS or the Federal Protective Service (FPS) is doing “to protect federal personnel and federal property” in the city, as well as explanations on what is being done to prevent further destruction to federal property and whether the DHS “still believes that it has the authority, the mission, and the intent to enforce federal law and protect federal property in Portland.”

In the letter to Garland, Jordan requested an explanation about the Department of Justice‘s (DOJ) efforts to identify and prosecute individuals attacking federal property and law enforcement. The lawmaker also asked for the DOJ’s plans to prevent further attacks, information on whether the DOJ still faults the city for letting the unrest happen, and inquired if the department still believes its previous description of “peaceful protesters.”

Jordan asked that Mayorkas and Garland provided the requested information, in writing, no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 12. Once that has happened, the lawmaker asked for them to provide a staff-level briefing.

You can follow Douglas Braff on Twitter @Douglas_P_Braff.

You may like

Continue Reading


Historic House Vote Expels Rep. George Santos Amidst Scandal



GettyImages 1824951906 scaled

In a turn of events, the House of Representatives made history on Friday with a vote to expel Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.), marking the first such expulsion in over two decades. A moment fraught with gravity unfolded as Speaker Mike Johnson wielded his gavel to formalize Santos’ removal, setting a precedent in congressional annals.

Santos, indicted on 23 counts related to wire fraud, identity theft, and other charges, has not faced conviction but stands accused of misusing campaign funds for opulent purchases. The bipartisan vote, tallying 311 to 114, signaled robust support for expulsion, with a marginally higher number of Republicans opting to retain Santos.

Questions loomed as Speaker Johnson left the chamber, his silence leaving the fate of the ongoing government spending battle uncertain. According to reports from Fox News, Democratic Rep. Steny Hoyer emphasized the non-partisan nature of the decision, asserting that members concluded Santos had tarnished the House’s reputation and was unfit for representation.

Within the GOP, conflicting opinions emerged, with Rep. Darrell Issa arguing against expulsion, citing the presumption of innocence. The tight-lipped stance of the House Ethics Committee played a pivotal role in the deliberations.

Conversely, members of the New York Republican delegation, led by Rep. Marc Molinaro, asserted Santos’ commission of crimes, justifying expulsion based on a comprehensive investigation.

Santos himself predicted the outcome in an exclusive morning interview on “FOX & Friends.” This vote not only underlines the House’s rare use of expulsion powers but also sets a critical precedent in handling members facing severe legal challenges.

You may like

Continue Reading