Connect with us

Politics

Joe Biden met with son’s foreign business partners on ‘numerous’ occasions

Published

on

joe biden and hunter biden

Just the News and the Government Accountability Institute reviewed 100,000 plus emails and text messages from Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop as well as bank records and memos obtained by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

“Those messages contain several references suggesting Joe and Hunter Biden a times commingled finances and business affairs” reports Just the News. “Joe Biden has claimed he never discussed his son’s business dealings and insinuated he never met with his son’s business partners.”

But messages and documents conflict with that portrayal, showing “Joe Biden referred potential work from the likes of Jeff Cooper to Hunter Biden and also met with his son’s foreign business partners on numerous occasions” such as:

Cooper is longtime Joe Biden donor and trial lawyer who worked with Beau Biden’s firm in Delaware on asbestos litigation dating back to 2005. From 2012 to 2014, Hunter Biden was listed as a manager of Cooper’s Eudora Global, LLC…

…It appears Devon Archer or Hunter Biden was able to deliver and 30 members of the Chinese Entrepreneurs Club (CEC) indeed visited the White House on Nov. 14, 2011, according to White House visitor logs. But those logs fail to disclose precisely whom the Chinese entrepreneurs met with: Vice President Joe Biden himself.

 A trip itinerary posted by the CEC indicates the delegation met with Obama’s then-recently-confirmed Commerce Secretary John Bryson but, like the visitor log, makes no mention of a meeting with the vice president. But Joe Biden did meet with his son’s associates. The secret meeting was revealed in an obscure document by one of the founders of the CEC.

In December 2013, Hunter Biden flew to Beijing with his father aboard Air Force Two for the latter’s official visit with Chinese Communist Party leaders. While the vice president was there on official business, the second son was there to line up a billion-dollar private equity deal with the Chinese. Hunter Biden admits that Joe Biden met with his Chinese business partner, Jonathan Li, in the lobby of a Chinese hotel.

In 2010, multiple emails show Hunter Biden and one of his partners at the Rosemont Seneca firm helped the White House with document for Joe Biden’s tax returns, after just one year in office. Not only did the then-vice president receive a tax refund, but the refund went directly into Hunter’s account:

“I am depositing it in his account and writing a check in that amount back to you since he owes it to you,” Rosemont Seneca official Eric Schwerin wrote in June 2010 about Joe Biden’s tax refund. “Don’t think I need to run it by him, but if you want to go ahead.”

You may like

Continue Reading
7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. Marie Dupre D.

    April 16, 2022 at 1:01 am

    Time for prosection! Joe committed those crimes while VP and now as (p)resident he seems to still be in contact and doing business with communist China and doesn’t care about what he’s done to Americans and America.

  2. Marie Dupre D.

    April 16, 2022 at 1:15 am

    Marie Dupre D.
    The proof is in the pudding Joe. Your son recorded so much on his laptop that will be all your downfalls. Every one of you wicked evil beings will be sent back from whence you came. DC is now the movie “Something Wicked This Way Comes”. You are all wicked evil Joe, you and all of Congress and half or more of the Senate too. The midterms will be a legal voting system. If Dems come out again winning then we definitely know the election is rigged. No other answer will be reasonable. Too many people have Biden/Harris remorse for any of you old evil beings to win again. We’re watching even closer this time. Voter id only to vote and American citizens only vote in American elections. Not illegals YOU F*&KING CHEATERS!

  3. Stephane

    April 17, 2022 at 4:57 am

    10% FOR THE BIG GUY!
    We all know the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION the LIAR IN CHIEF has been part of since his days on the lap the GRAND KEAGLE!!!
    Absolute Despotism has been the bread and butter of the LIAR in CHIEF!
    Too many recorded images, words, and facts are visible to whomever decides to look for them!

  4. Joseph Bernstein

    April 17, 2022 at 10:55 am

    Big Guy Joe is the head of the largest crime family in this once great country

  5. jerry

    April 17, 2022 at 11:04 am

    So why aren’t they indicted yet. get him out before he gets us all nuked Time is of essence! they wanted to impeach Trump three times for nothing, why can’t you impeach Biden for something everyone knows its true? people are going to get fed up with this double standards for the left, you haven’t seen a real insurrection, that last one was a phony made up by the left and I wonder who was the leader on that powerful enough to get the FBI in on it!

  6. Jay

    April 17, 2022 at 8:16 pm

    Thats because Joes a Crook. Treason comes to mind.

  7. jim

    April 19, 2022 at 10:04 am

    This is one example of our two-tiered justice system we have in the US! He will never be held accountable for all the illegal garbage he has done, is doing, and will do before his sorry a$$ is removed from office! WE, THE PEOPLE, NEED TO GET HIM AND HIS COHORTS OUT OF OFFICE—NOW, BEFORE HE SELLS THE US TO CHINA AND RUSSIA!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Media

WSJ: Corporate Dirty Pool in Washington’s Senate Race

Published

on

GettyImages 1241869045 scaled

The Wall Street Journal’s,  Kimberly A. Strassel wrote a piece identifying how the Democrats are so worried about Washington Senator Patty Murray’s re-election “that Seattle’s corporate heavyweights are playing dirty pool on her behalf.”

Murray, a leftwing progressive, has faced little competition while in office; until now. Tiffany Smiley, a Republican nurse and entrepreneur “is pummeling Ms. Murray from every direction and laying out her own detailed reform agenda” adds the WSJ.

A RealClearPolitics average has Ms. Murray winning by 8 points. Another poll has Smiley within 2 points. Regardless, It’s close enough that “Majority Leader Chuck Schumer recently transferred $500,000 of his own campaign cash to Ms. Murray’s campaign.”

Money from Schumer isn’t the only liberal panic dough. “Starbucks, the Seattle Times and the Seattle Seahawks—are actively attempting to sabotage the Smiley campaign, albeit in a distinctly underhanded fashion” writes the WSJ. “Their targets are two effective Smiley campaign ads.”

At the center of the fight are two of Smiley’s ads: “Game Day” and “Cup of Coffee.”

Strassel reports:

In “Game Day” the Republican is in a kitchen preparing to watch a football game, hitting Ms. Murray and Democrats for the spiraling cost of food. In “Cup of Coffee,” she stands in front of a derelict building. Barely visible at the top, and seen backward, is the store’s faded Starbucks sign. Ms. Smiley hits Ms. Murray for rising crime, while the ad flashes two Seattle Times headlines, one of which reads: “Starbucks to Close 5 Seattle Stores Over Safety Concerns.”

“Game Day” hit the airwaves Sept 1. Five days later, according to documents I obtained, the Smiley campaign received a terse email from the Seahawks claiming a trademark violation. The ad briefly shows Ms. Smiley’s husband, Scotty—a retired U.S. Army Ranger who was blinded by shrapnel in Iraq—expressing alarm that “even beer” prices are rising. You only see his shoulders above a tall couch—and if you get a magnifying glass you might make out a letter or two from the word “Seahawks.” The letter insisted the Smiley campaign “immediately cease” its “unauthorized commercial use.” Nothing like your local sports franchise dumping cease-and-desist orders on wounded veterans.

“Cup of Coffee” went live on Sept. 20. The next day, the Seattle Times sent an email to the “Jane Smiley” campaign—apparently without running it past its fact-checking desk—accusing it of “unauthorized use of The Seattle Times logo and two headlines” in violation of the paper’s “copyright and trademark.” It demanded the campaign remove any references to the paper not only in its own ad, but in an NBC News article about the ad’s launch.

Two days later, Starbucks sent a certified letter saying the campaign was appropriating its intellectual property, and complaining it might “create an unfounded association in the minds of consumers between Starbucks and your campaign.” It insisted the campaign either pull the ad or alter it to strip both the (barely visible, backward) sign and the Seattle Times headline referencing Starbucks.

One such letter may be the product of an overzealous lawyer, but three in a row looks like more than a coincidence. One might even wonder if some Murray staffer was putting bugs in Seattle business leaders’ ears. And while corporate political-action committees routinely play politics by making donations, it’s something else for individual companies to go to bat for a candidate via behind-the-scenes threats based on tenuous legal claims. These letters were bound to cost the Smiley campaign money and headaches and might have pushed it off the airwaves.

The campaign didn’t roll over. It made a painless accommodation to the “Game Day” ad, blurring the jersey colors to obscure anything distinct. In a legal letter sent Thursday to Starbucks, the campaign rebutted the company’s infringement claims, running through political speech protections and noting that no reasonable person would ever think a factual ad about shuttered Starbucks stores amounted to a coffee-chain endorsement. It suggested Starbucks focus on its own problems, like its recent union woes.

The Seattle Times also received a letter refuting its claims, but it got something in addition. The Smiley campaign on Thursday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint, charging the paper with providing the Murray campaign a prohibited in-kind contribution. It turns out that Ms. Murray has also used a Seattle Times headline in her ads. Her “First 2016 Ad” sports the newspaper’s logo under the headline: “Patty Murray’s and Paul Ryan’s Teamwork Is a Model for Congress.” It seems the Times has a different legal standard for candidates it endorses.

As the FEC complaint notes, the Smiley campaign would have to spend an estimated $5,000 to remove and update the ad—“costs that Patty Murray does not have to accrue.” It cites FEC regulations that provide “if a corporation makes its resources available for free, it must do so for all candidates.”

Don’t expect the Seattle corporate set to do anything on behalf of Ms. Smiley soon. But it shouldn’t be too much to ask that they do their politicking straight—and out in the open.

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending

Proudly Made In America | © 2022 M3 Media Management, LLC