Connect with us


Jerry Nadler Calls Antifa ‘A Myth’



Screen Shot 2020 07 27 at 8.19.59 AM

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-NY, told popular social media figure Austen Fletcher, also known as “Fleccas,” that Antifa is “a myth that’s being spread only in Washington, D.C.”

Fletcher said in a tweet Sunday that he “ran into” the top Democrat lawmaker while in Washington when he “asked him to disavow the Antifa violence/rioting in Portland.”

Nadler was soon escorted to his car by an individual after quickly responding to Fletcher who continued, “Sir, there’s videos everywhere online. There’s fires and riots. They’re throwing fireworks at federal officers, DHS is there. Look online, it gets crazy, Mr. Nadler.”

According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, violent anarchists have created chaos for over eight weeks in Portland and continue attempts to destroy the Hatfield Federal Courthouse, using ropes, saws, hammers, bolt cutters, and power tools.

Moreover, the rioters have aimed hard projectiles, mortar style fireworks and blinding lasers at law enforcement in the area, according to DHS.

Saturday was no different with thousands gathering to try to tear down the reinforced fence erected to protect the Courthouse. In the early morning hours on Sunday, rioters managed to pull down part of the fence.

Portland Police Bureau quickly made a riot declaration and a tense standoff between the anarchists and law enforcement attempting to quell the situation soon took place, resulting in the injuries of 14 federal law enforcement officers, one Federal Protective Service officer.

Six individuals were also arrested for assaulting federal law enforcement and two others for not complying with law enforcement orders, according to DHS.

You may like

Continue Reading


Biden Administration Proposes Rule to Fortify Federal Bureaucracy Against Republican Presidency



Joe Biden

In a strategic move, the Biden administration has unveiled a proposed rule aimed at reinforcing the left-leaning federal bureaucracy, potentially hindering future conservative policy implementations by Republican presidents. This move has raised concerns about the efficacy of democratic elections when a deep-seated bureaucracy remains largely unchanged, regardless of electoral outcomes.

Key points of the situation include:

Presidential Appointees vs. Career Bureaucrats: Of the 2.2 million federal civil workers, only 4,000 are presidential appointees. The vast majority, made up of career bureaucrats, continue in their roles from one administration to the next. This continuity is facilitated by rules that make it exceedingly difficult to discipline or replace them, resulting in a bureaucracy that tends to lean left politically.

Union Political Affiliation: A striking 95% of unionized federal employees who donate to political candidates support Democrats, according to Open Secrets, with only 5% favoring Republicans. This significant political skew among federal workers raises questions about the potential for political bias in the execution of government policies.

Obstructionism and Challenges for GOP Presidents: Some career bureaucrats have been accused of obstructing Republican presidents’ agendas, leading to policy delays and challenges. For example, during the Trump administration, career lawyers in the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division declined to challenge Yale University’s discrimination against Asian American applicants, prompting Trump to seek legal counsel from other divisions. The case was subsequently dropped when Joe Biden took office.

Biden’s Countermeasures: President Biden has taken steps to protect the bureaucracy’s status quo. In October 2020, Trump issued an executive order aiming to reclassify federal workers who make policy as at-will employees, but Biden canceled it upon taking office.

Proposed Rule and Congressional Actions: The rule unveiled by the Biden administration seeks to further impede a president’s ability to reinstate Trump’s order. Additionally, some Democrats in Congress are pushing to eliminate the president’s authority to reclassify jobs entirely. This has been referred to as an attempt to “Trump-proof the federal workforce.”

Republican Candidates’ Pledge: GOP candidates such as President Donald J Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Ron DeSantis have pledged to address this issue. According to reports from Fox News, Ramaswamy has gone further, advocating for the elimination of half or more of civil service positions, emphasizing the need for accountability.

Debate on the Merit of the Civil Service: While Democrats and their media allies argue that civil service protects merit over patronage, critics contend that the system has evolved into a form of job security for federal workers with minimal accountability. Federal employees often receive higher salaries and more substantial benefits than their private-sector counterparts.

In summary, the Biden administration’s proposed rule and broader actions to protect the federal bureaucracy have sparked a debate over the role of career bureaucrats in shaping government policy.

Republican candidates are vowing to address these concerns, highlighting the need for accountability and ensuring that government agencies work in alignment with the elected president’s agenda. This ongoing debate raises important questions about the relationship between the bureaucracy and the democratic process in the United States.

Information in this article was retrieved from Fox News.

You may like

Continue Reading