Connect with us


HYPOCRISY: Chris Cuomo LOSES IT on air over President Trump’s mask



chris cuomo donald trump cnn

CNN anchor Chris Cuomo had a meltdown Monday night over President Donald Trump’s decision to take off his mask in his own house: The White House. The medical staff at Walter Reed Military Medical Center released Trump from their care after he successfully battled the worst first days of his COVID-19 infection.

Cuomo, along with many other leftist Joe Biden supporters, couldn’t take President Trump’s swift recovery from the “China virus.” After days of hoping and reporting that the President could be very ill and possibly on his way out of the planet, his sudden recovery was an affront to their hopes.

The anger was obvious and thankfully, for those of us who don’t watch CNN, we can all watch the melt down on Twitter or Youtube.

Also, what about Cuomo’s hypocrisy? Remember he’s the guy that was galavanting around the Hamptons after testing positive for COVID-19. Remember all his ridiculous interviews from his fancy basement and it was those same interviews where he was caught in his own lies.

On Monday, Cuomo accused Trump of putting out propaganda because he took his mask off, saying the President “was fronting a lie to his people.”

Interesting choice of words, don’t you think.

So weird that American people who voted for Trump are no longer called Americans but Cuomo and CNN have made Trump supporters like aliens, calling them “his people.”

It’s an us vs. them situation being spouted in the news daily and dividing our nation the way we have never seen in the past.

“How much bullshit do you need in your life?” Cuomo said Monday night, in a fit of rage.

I had to add this ridiculous quote. Notice how CNN anchors and journalists are using expletives more often on television. They think the word “bullshit” makes them endearing to millennials and leftist hipsters. They couldn’t be more wrong.

Continue Reading


Is the FBI ‘purging’ agents with Conservative views?




On Thursday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan formally requested that the Justice Department’s Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, open an investigation into the FBI’s alleged use of political litmus tests to sideline or remove agents and employees with conservative viewpoints. This request also included a direct warning to FBI Director Christopher Wray about these practices.

Jordan’s action follows a report by Just the News detailing how an FBI security clearance review involved inquiries about an employee’s political beliefs. Specifically, the review asked whether the employee had expressed support for former President Donald Trump, attended a Second Amendment rally, or voiced skepticism about COVID-19 vaccines.

In a letter to Director Wray, Jordan expressed wrote, “The FBI appears to be purging itself of employees who do not share its preferred political views.” He emphasized the troubling nature of these practices, especially when they impinge on fundamental liberties and constitutional rights.

Speaking on the “John Solomon Reports” podcast, Jordan highlighted the severity of the situation: “Particularly when they’re asking about fundamental liberties, your constitutional rights, I mean, that is that is frightening stuff.” He further noted the retaliatory actions taken against whistleblowers who bring such issues to light, adding, “You put all that together, and you talk about politics driving what happens there.”

Jordan’s inquiry into the political weaponization of law enforcement has been ongoing, with a particular focus on the FBI’s conduct. In his communication with Inspector General Horowitz, Jordan underscored that the targeting of an employee’s political beliefs and First Amendment activities was deeply concerning and seemingly unrelated to legitimate security risk assessments. “These actions only serve to further erode the dwindling public trust in the FBI and reinforce the Committee and Select Subcommittee’s concerns about political bias within the FBI,” he wrote.

Jordan also referenced evidence uncovered by Judicial Watch, which suggested political retaliation against FBI whistleblowers aiding Congress. He pointed out that an FBI official allegedly disclosed nonpublic information about these whistleblowers to a Democrat member of the Select Subcommittee, ostensibly to discredit their testimonies about FBI misconduct. “It appears from the documents that the FBI sought to selectively disclose this nonpublic information so that it would be used to impugn the credibility of the whistleblowers,” Jordan stated.

In his separate letter to Wray, Jordan questioned the relevance of political viewpoints to security clearance determinations. He argued that while assessing the legality of employees’ actions is legitimate, questions about political beliefs are “completely irrelevant to any legitimate security risk determination” and infringe upon First Amendment rights.

Following the release of internal FBI memos showing that bureau officials had inquired about an employee’s support for Trump, stance on COVID-19 vaccines, and participation in a Second Amendment rally, concerns about political bias have intensified. These memos indicated that the employee’s security clearance was revoked months after confirming his conservative views and vaccine skepticism.

Tristan Leavitt, the lawyer representing the affected FBI employee, commended the congressional oversight, stating, “It’s good to see Congress holding the FBI’s feet to the fire.” He emphasized the need for a thorough investigation into how these questions were used to justify purging conservative employees from the FBI.

 Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton echoed this sentiment on the “Just the News, No Noise” TV show, predicting that the FBI would attempt to deflect criticism despite clear evidence of misconduct. “I’m sure we’ll get some distraction and noise from Chris Wray and a reaffirmation that the FBI never does anything wrong, even when it’s caught red-handed,” Fitton remarked.

Continue Reading