An England hospital has advised staff to not use the term ‘breast milk,’ in order to be more inclusive to trans parents, the Washington Examiner reported.
The more acceptable terms to use at the Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals (BSUH) NHS Trust are ‘human milk,’ ‘breast/chest milk,’ or ‘milk from the feeding mother or birthing parents.’
Brighton and Sussex Hospitals are the first in the country to formally implement a gender-inclusive language policy for its maternity services department, which will now be known as the “perinatal services” department.
According to the new policy, the service will be “using gender-neutral language alongside the language of womanhood, in order to ensure that everyone is represented and included.”
Other changes include using the term ‘mothers or birthing parents’ instead of ‘mother’ and ‘parent,’ ‘co-parent’ or ‘second biological parent’ instead of ‘father.’
The word “woman” with also be replaced with the phrase ‘woman or person.’
The language changes will be implemented on hospital webpages, leaflets and letters and emails. Staff will be asked to use language which reflects patient’s “own identities and preferences.”
In a statement, the BSUH said, “Gender identity can be a source of oppression and health inequality. We are consciously using the words ‘women’ and ‘people’ together to make it clear that we are committed to working on addressing health inequalities for all those who use our services.”
“As midwives and birth workers, we focus on improving access and health outcomes for marginalised and disadvantaged groups. Women are frequently disadvantaged in healthcare, as are trans and nonbinary people,” the BSUH said. “By continuing to use the term ‘woman’ we commit to working on addressing health inequalities for all who use our services.”
Follow Annaliese Levy on Twitter @AnnalieseLevy
You may like
Trump: Tanks to Ukraine could escalate to use of ‘NUKES’
Former President Donald Trump stated bluntly on Truth Social, “FIRST COME THE TANKS, THEN COME THE NUKES. Get this crazy war ended, NOW. So easy to do!”
Trump was referring to the escalation of war in Ukraine. He, like many other commentators and lawmakers, are warning that the decision to continue sending weapons – and now tanks – could potentially lead to the use of “nuclear weapons.”
It’s mission creep and it’s dangerous, they say.
Why? Because Russian President Valdimir Putin has indicated in two different speeches that he would use nuclear weapons to defend Russia, if needed. Those warnings are not just bluster but a very real possibility.
And the escalation of war is visible.
Russia launched 55 missiles strikes across Ukraine Thursday, leaving 11 dead. The strikes come one day after the United States and Germany agreed to send tanks to Ukraine in an effort to aide the country. 47 of the 55 missiles were shot down according to Ukraine’s Air Force command.
Eleven lives were lost and another 11 were injured additionally leaving 35 buildings damaged in the wake of the attacks. According to The New York Times, Denys Shmyhal, said in a post on Telegram. “The main goal is energy facilities, providing Ukrainians with light and heat,” he said.
Ukraine is now demanding that they need F-16 fighter jets. In a post on twitter Ukrainian lawmaker, Oleksiy Goncharenko said, “Missiles again over Ukraine. We need F16.”
Morning. Missiles again over Ukraine. We need F16.
— Oleksiy Goncharenko (@GoncharenkoUa) January 26, 2023
The US has abstained from sending advanced jets in the chances that a volatile decision could foster more dangerous attacks like former President Trump’s post on Truth referred to. If the US did authorize the decision to lend Ukraine the F-16 jets Netherlands’ foreign minister, Wopke Hoekstra, would be willing to supply them. According to The New York Times, Hoekstra told Dutch lawmakers, “We are open-minded… There are no taboos.”
F-16 fighter jets are complex to work on, they are not the average aircraft that can be learned in a matter of weeks. It can take months for pilots to learn how to fly these birds. European and US officials have the concern that Ukrainian forces could potentially use the jets to fly into Russian airspace and launch attacks on Russian soil.
Western allies are trying to avoid such a provocation, because that could lead to nuclear warfare in reference to what Putin has said he would do to defend his country.
You may like
Politics5 days ago
‘Coordinated effort’ to hide Hunter Biden information: Treasury denies request for reports
Elections5 days ago
Judge orders Biden’s DHS to release files on agents accused of censoring election ‘misinformation’
Immigration2 days ago
Migrants refuse to go to Brooklyn cruise terminal shelter, return to Manhattan hotel
Immigration1 day ago
Texas Governor hires ‘border czar’ to accelerate wall construction