Trump Protects America—Judge Protects Terrorists
By Wendy Kinney @paymentsSHEEO
———-
When President Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act, he exercised a constitutional power enshrined in law since 1798—used by presidents from Woodrow Wilson to Jimmy Carter. But in a world where Trump’s every move is treated as an existential threat by the Left, his lawful actions face constant obstruction.
In an unprecedented move, a district court judge, James Boasberg, issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) in response to a lawsuit filed by the ACLU. The ruling is not only baseless—it’s jurisdictionally absurd. First, the ACLU’s named defendants were located in Texas—not in Boasberg’s district. Second, the deportation aircraft in question had already left U.S. airspace and was in international territory. And third—and most egregiously—this ruling attempts to override the President’s constitutional duty.
The Alien Enemies Act, codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 21–24, grants the President the explicit authority to detain, restrict, or deport nationals of foreign adversaries. Presidents have historically used this power to protect national security without controversy. President Jimmy Carter was praised by the media when he used this authority during the Iran hostage crisis. Yet, when President Trump uses the same tool, it’s branded as authoritarianism.
What changed? Only the name on the Oval Office door.
Even without the Alien Enemies Act, President Trump has full authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to remove criminal aliens and national security threats. Sections 212(a) and 237(a) permit the deportation of those who entered illegally or pose a threat to national security—including MS-13 operatives and cartel enforcers. He utilized these laws effectively during his first term and continues to use them today.
The Constitution not only permits—it explicitly requires—the President to protect the nation and defend its borders. Article II, Section 1 mandates the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and Article IV, Section 4 specifically states the federal government must protect states against invasion. This constitutional responsibility is absolute, supreme, and non-negotiable. It transcends politics, judges, and courts—no judicial ruling, particularly one from a lower court judge, holds the constitutional authority to obstruct or undermine this fundamental presidential duty. Any attempt by activist judges to interfere represents an unconstitutional encroachment on executive authority and a direct assault on the safety and sovereignty of the United States.
Despite this clear constitutional mandate, President Trump continues to face judicial obstruction. The recent judicial intervention was not oversight—it was judicial sabotage at its worst, a dangerous attempt by activist judges to undermine the President’s explicit constitutional authority. Judge Boasberg has no constitutional jurisdiction here—his ruling was not just incorrect, but unlawful and reckless.
And what about the media and Democrat leaders? They have become so consumed with opposing Trump that they’re now effectively defending the most violent, ruthless gangs on earth. To disagree with Trump, they’ll defend anyone—even terrorists. They elevate criminals, glorify lawlessness, and demonize those who demand justice. In city after city, their policies have unleashed barbarism: women raped, children tortured by cartel enforcers, innocent civilians murdered. Some victims set on fire, others dismembered and left as warnings. These aren’t mere policies—they’re a moral catastrophe. Yet, Democrat activists shield violent criminals and obstruct Trump’s efforts to remove them.
While activist judges in America undermine security, other leaders abroad demonstrate what decisive action looks like. President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador launched one of history’s most aggressive crackdowns on gangs—building mega-prisons and locking away tens of thousands of gang members. Now, he’s aiding the U.S. by accepting deported gang members into those same prisons, sending an unmistakable message: Your reign of terror is over.
During Biden’s reckless open-border free-for-all, 1.7 million known “gotaways”—including gang operatives from Trenta De Agua—entered the U.S., deliberately sent by hostile regimes such as Venezuela to destabilize America from within. Trump has rightly designated these gangs as terrorist organizations and is using every legal tool available to remove their operatives from American soil.
Mr. President, fuel the jets. Ignore the judge. Protect this country—because no judicial ruling can obstruct your constitutional duty to defend this nation.
We’re done playing defense. We’re standing firm—in truth, resolve, and the unshakable belief that America is worth protecting.
While our so-called leaders cower behind platitudes and court orders, others rise with courage and conviction.
Mr. President, you carry the mantle of leadership not merely as a politician—but as the defender of our nation’s sovereignty. Your fight is our fight. You’re not just leading a movement—you’re leading a nation home.
About the Author: Wendy Kinney is a devout Christian, legal strategist, attorney, and entrepreneur committed to free speech, financial freedom, and the Constitution. As Founder & CEO of Revere Payments, she speaks truth to power with conviction, standing firm in faith, justice, and the unwavering belief that freedom must always be defended. Her work is rooted in light, guided by principle, and fearless in the fight for truth.
Most excellent report!
🤩 KUDOS, Wendy! YOU GO GIRL!!! 👍
Fighting EVIL is Always Tough. Satan was Allowed a Lot of Power. We HAVE Choice.
Liberalism…. GODLESSISM…. MUST, BE VANQUISHED.
Arrest and/or impeach ALL these Democrats/communist activist judges for exceeding their judicial authority they think that they have and disbar them for life💯💯👎👎👎🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Words of wisdom and could not be more true. The Judges have no authority to over ride the president. Look at Biden the Supreme Court told him he couldn’t yet he did. So there you have it. I do believe that the only way a Presidential decision can be overcome is be a majority vote in congress. I may be wrong.
Here it is in a neat nutshell. Activist judges such as Boasburg have committed treason against the constitution and publicly be arrested and charges read aloud with the law for the public to hear. So district judges and circuit judges, even the Supreme Court will be able to interfere with further judicial overreach.
Extreme politically motivated judicial overreach such as the decision here by Judge Boasberg calls into question lifetime appointments for federal judges. Lifetime appointments are necessary to insulate Judges from retribution for decisions that are unpopular but supported by statute, precedent, jurisdiction and legal authority. There is no constitutional or statutory basis or authority for the federal judicial intrusion into this matter. The overreach here is so blatantly unsupported and political that impeachment proceedings must be initiated against Boasberg to send a clear message about constitutionally delineated separation of power and judicial overreach.
This is the best argument to let the liberals know that they are going against the US Constitution. The liberals or the activists judges have apparently never read the Constitution! Keep up the good fight and may God bless and keep you safe!
The ACLU should be disbanded. All they do is complain about our laws in favor of the lawbreakers. They are on the wrong side of the law.
Absolutely great article
Correct. The government is composed of three equal separate and distinct branches. The judicial does NOT have authority over the executive and cannot make executive decisions. Some activist judges have stated that President Trump is not a King…well, neither are those activist judges who need to simply Stay in their Lane.
One more time, boys and girls, if these ‘unelected’ magpies in robes can undermine, delay, suspend, restrain, the President of The United States in performing his “People’s Mandate,” it is possible that they can ‘run-out-the-clock’ on many, or most, with these “lawsuits,” by the time that SCOTUS acts on each. That is WHY those other *9* Magpies in Robes should SHUT IT ALL DOWN IMMEDIATELY! As John Stossel would say, “GIVE ME A BREAK.”
I know it will look bad, but Congress needs to impeach every one of these activist judges.