Connect with us

Nation

Former FBI Deputy Director McCabe outed by agents, revealing Flynn investigation was a concocted ‘top down’ operation

Published

on

James Comey Andrew McCabe

FBI agent William Barnett knew from the beginning there was never any evidence of wrongdoing by retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

Barnett, who played a lead role investigating Flynn, explained to the Justice Department in interviews earlier this month that FBI officials senior to him in Flynn’s investigation ignored his concerns and his investigative recommendations that Flynn was not a worthy target of investigation.

According to sources, who spoke to SaraACarter.com those senior FBI officials, to include former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, along with others, didn’t want to stop the investigation into Flynn because as Barnett described it in his interviews, Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel team had a ‘get Trump’ goal.

Those documents, that include Barnett’s interview with Justice Department Attorney Jeffery Jensen, who was appointed by Attorney General William Barr to investigate the alleged wrongdoing by the FBI in Flynn’s case, were obtained by Flynns defense team and released to the public Friday morning.

It’s very unusual even in a special investigation for the investigating agent to not interview his or her subject, and even more unusual to be told that someone else is interviewing the subject after the fact, according to a former senior FBI official, who spoke on background.

Related: Exclusive: McCabe Allegedly at the center of Durham’s probe

“Bill is what we all an Agent’s Agent, meaning he investigates cases with no bias or agenda, his only purpose is to figure out right and wrong,” former FBI agent.

Barnett – who was charged with Flynn’s case – didn’t know Flynn had been interviewed by fired FBI Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok, as well as FBI Supervisory Special Agent Joe Pientka.

Bill Barnett is known at the Washington field office as a tireless and incorruptible investigator his work ethic, attention to detail and absolute diligence have made him extremely successful in multiple high profile cases,” said a former FBI colleague of Barnett’s from the Washington Field Office. “Bill is what we all an Agent’s Agent, meaning he investigates cases with no bias or agenda, his only purpose is to figure out right and wrong.”

Barnett said during his interview with the DOJ that he “still did not see any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.”

“Barnett was willing to follow any instructions being given by the deputy director as long as it was not a violation of the law,” he added.

The admission by the top FBI official charged with investigating Flynn is stunning and reveals that years of documented evidence pointing to malfeasance inside the FBI’s investigation is warranted enough for the DOJ’s criminal investigation.

The actions by senior FBI officials, as well as other senior Obama Administration officials, appears to paint a dangerous picture of an attempted soft coup against President Donald Trump and the American people who voted for him.

On Thursday night, SaraACarter.com published an exclusive story based on interviews with Federal law enforcement officials that stated that Connecticut prosecutor John Durham is honing in on former McCabe, who had kept information from investigators. That information would have revealed that the primary sub source for former British Spy Christopher Steele’s debunked dossier was an alleged Russian spy that the FBI had been targeting for some time.

McCabe was also charged with the Flynn investigation. In Barnett’s 302 interview, which was attached to Powell’s motion to dismiss case against Flynn, he noted that he ran the request to interview Flynn “up the chain.” He said the request was denied, and described the FBI’s investigation into Flynn as “top down” investigation. According to several former FBI officials that means that McCabe, along with former FBI Director James Comey, were charged with the investigation.

According to Barnett the “direction concerning the investigation was coming from senior officials,” specifically then-Deputy FBI Director McCabe.

Barnett noted that he was concerned about the investigation and where it was heading. He said the failure to have any evidence was “problematic and could result in an inspector general investigation.”

“Barnett still did not see any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government,” the 302 stated. “Barnett was willing to follow any instructions being given by the deputy director as long as it was not a violation of the law.”

Barnett told investigators he believed the investigation into Flynn was a “check the box exercise, making sure all bases were covered, before the case was closed,” and said he “did not” think the case “was leading or headed toward prosecution.” Former FBI officials who know Barnett said they absolutely believe he is telling the truth.

Moreover, Barnett’s interview emerged just a day after the Justice Department released text messages showing FBI analysts bought liability insurance in January 2017 because they were worried about being sued for misconduct.

As for Flynn’s phone call with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak Barnett said, “with respect to Flynn’s [phone call] with the Russian ambassador in December 2016,” he did not believe Flynn was being directed by President Trump. He also noted that he did not believe Flynn had any additional information to provide Special Counsel’s Officer.”

In fact, Barnett believed the prosecution of Flynn by the Special Counsel was used as a means to ‘get Trump.’ “

“Interesting that they believed they would get away with it,” said a former senior intelligence official. “They never expected Trump to win and had to get into cover up mode after he did win the election. I wonder what else they are hiding.”

You may like

Continue Reading

Economy

Chevron downsizes global San Fran headquarters, paying for employees to move to Texas office

Published

on

GettyImages 1238567912 scaled

Oil giant Chevron made a huge announcement saying it will be closing its current global headquarters in San Ramon, California. Even more telling, its encouraging employees to move to Houston, Texas.

The San Francisco Gate reported “the oil company will cover relocation costs for those voluntarily leaving for the Texas office, which has been growing and employs nearly 6,000 people. Meanwhile, the San Ramon office buildings have experienced dwindling numbers in recent years.”

Although the company is not leaving the state completely, “company leadership has pushed for a permanent move to Texas in the past” adds SFGATE. Chevron, which has had “deep roots” in California going back to the late 1800s, will vacate its 100-acre campus in 2023.

The Wall Street Journal reports the business hopes to move into a smaller space in San Ramon, which will remain its headquarters. A company spokesperson told SFGATE “the current real estate market provides the opportunity to right-size our office space to meet the requirements of our headquarters-based employee population.”

“The move is expected to occur during the third quarter of 2023” they continued. “Chevron will remain headquartered in California, where the company has a 140-year history and operations and partnerships throughout the state.”

The SFGATE notes Chevron is one of “the East Bay’s legacy companies joining the trend” to move their headquarters out of the area in recent years. Tech companies such as startups like Coinbase to industry pioneers like Hewlett Packard and Oracle have all vacated, with Elon Musk having been “one particularly outspoken voice decrying California’s business conditions.”

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending

Proudly Made In America | © 2022 M3 Media Management, LLC