Connect with us

Nation

Former Biden nuclear official, Sam Brinton, incarcerated, ‘fugitive from justice’

Published

on

Screen Shot 2022 11 29 at 5.16.03 PM

The former Biden nuclear official, Sam Brinton, was arrested, Wednesday, May 17th, charging him as a  ‘fugitive from justice’ in Rockville, Maryland, according to records found of Maryland’s online public Judiciary case search.

A fugitive from justice is defined as, “any person who has fled from any State to avoid prosecution for a crime or avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding,” Under 18 U.S.C. § 921. 

The gender fluid non-binary ex-Biden Senior Department of Energy official, Brinton, who has been in a slew of trouble with the law in the past for luggage theft including the charge of grand larceny, is being held without bond in the Montgomery County Central Processing Unit.

 

According to reports from Fox News, Montgomery County Police Department spokesperson, Shiera Goff, told Fox News Digital, “the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Police are lead on this.”

Goff informed Fox News Digital that, “Brinton was arrested at approximately 10 p.m. last night in their home on College Parkway.” Furthermore, a witness who is allegedly Brinton’s neighbor told The Daily Wire in an interview that there were for unmarked police vehicles that showed up at Brinton’s residence and about an hour after he was taken into custody.

Just a month ago, Brinton evaded time in the slammer after judges from, Nevada and Minnesota, who were presiding over two cases independent of one another, involving Brinton, deemed that jail time was not necessary. In October of last year, Minneapolis-St. Paul law enforcement officers charged Brinton with stealing luggage that was worth a whopping $2,325 from the luggage carousel. It doesn’t stop there, last year in early December, prosecutors in Las Vegas, Nevada charged the kleptomaniac Brinton with grand larceny. The stolen items were valued between $1,200 and $5,000.

This reporter from SaraACarter.com has reached out to the Department of Energy for comment on Brinton’s arrest but has yet to receive a response.

We will continue to update this story as we learn more. 

Follow Alexander Carter on Twitter @AlexCarterDC for more!  

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Elections

BREAKING: Trump ordered to pay over $350M, barred from operating his business in NY in civil fraud case ruling

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump and his business empire faced a significant setback as a New York judge ruled against them in a civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The 92-page ruling, handed down by Judge Arthur Engoron, barred Trump from operating his business in New York for three years and imposed over $350 million in damages.

The case, which unfolded over months of trial proceedings, stemmed from allegations that Trump inflated his assets and engaged in fraudulent practices. Engoron’s ruling cited a litany of charges, including persistent fraud, falsifying records, issuing false financial statements, and conspiracy to commit fraud.

Moreover, the judge imposed restrictions on key figures within the Trump Organization, including Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, barring them from serving in certain corporate roles in New York for a specified period.

Engoron’s scathing assessment of Trump’s testimony during the trial further undermined the former president’s credibility. The judge criticized Trump for evasive responses and irrelevant digressions, highlighting the detrimental effect on his credibility.

In response to the ruling, Trump’s attorney, Christopher Kise, lambasted the court’s decision, alleging political bias and a disregard for established legal principles. Kise argued that the evidence presented during the trial failed to support the allegations of fraud and emphasized Trump’s substantial net worth.

Kise’s assertions were echoed by Alina Habba, another attorney representing Trump, who denounced the verdict as a “manifest injustice” resulting from a politically motivated witch hunt.

Throughout the proceedings, Trump consistently dismissed the trial as politically motivated, accusing both Engoron and James of partisan bias. His legal team also criticized the absence of a jury in the trial, questioning the fairness of the proceedings.

Attorney General Letitia James, who spearheaded the lawsuit against Trump and his organization, portrayed the ruling as a victory for accountability and transparency in business practices. The lawsuit alleged fraudulent conduct and sought substantial financial penalties, a portion of which would contribute to the state treasury.

The fallout from the case extends beyond Trump and his business interests, with implications for the broader business community and the rule of law. The contentious nature of the trial and its outcome underscored deep divisions and raised questions about the integrity of the legal system.

Trump vows to appeal the decision.

Continue Reading

Trending