During a bombshell testimony Tuesday, former Biden family associate Tony Bobulinski implicated President Joe Biden in what he described as “shady” overseas business dealings. The closed-door testimony, which took place before the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, shed light on alleged influence-peddling operations involving Biden’s son Hunter and brother James during Joe Biden’s tenure as vice president.
Bobulinski asserted in his opening statement that Joe Biden was not only aware of but actively enabled the lucrative schemes orchestrated by his family. He emphasized Biden’s pivotal role, stating, “It is clear to me that Joe Biden was ‘the Brand’ being sold by the Biden family.” This testimony echoes previous accounts, including that of former Hunter Biden associate Devon Archer, who highlighted the family’s foreign influence peddling.
“His family’s foreign influence peddling operation — from China to Ukraine and elsewhere — sold out to foreign actors who were seeking to gain influence and access to Joe Biden and the United States government. Joe Biden was more than a participant in and beneficiary of his family’s business; he was an enabler, despite being buffered by a complex scheme to maintain plausible deniability,” Bobulinski added.
The focus of scrutiny extends beyond mere awareness to active participation and benefit. Bobulinski portrayed Biden as more than a passive recipient, labeling him an enabler who facilitated transactions designed to exploit his high office for personal gain. He emphasized the direct correlation between Biden’s position and the influx of tens of millions of dollars into the family’s coffers from foreign entities seeking access and influence.
Bobulinski’s involvement with Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC provided insights into the intricate web of international negotiations, including the ill-fated “SinoHawk” joint venture with Hunter Biden and associates. His claims of meeting Joe Biden in Beverly Hills and discussing business underscored the proximity between Biden’s political activities and family business ventures.
The accusations of fraud against the Bidens, coupled with Bobulinski’s assertion of being sidelined by law enforcement and grand juries, raise significant questions about accountability and transparency. Despite the mounting evidence and testimonies, there remains a glaring absence of official inquiries into Bobulinski’s perspective on the Biden family’s business dealings.
According to a memo presented by House Republicans, the Biden family and its affiliates allegedly received over $24 million from various sources over a five-year period. This revelation adds weight to Bobulinski’s claims and underscores the urgency of investigating the extent of Biden’s involvement in these transactions.
