Connect with us

Elections

ELECTION DECEPTION: Two known swindlers arrested for robocall scheme in Michigan

Published

on

Jack Burkman Jacob Wohl vote intimidation

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed charges Thursday against conservative political so-called operatives Jack Burkman, 54, and Jacob Wohl, 22, for allegedly instituting a scheme to bombard residents with robocalls that law enforcement officials said were “aimed at suppressing the vote in the November general election.”

“Any effort to interfere with, intimidate or intentionally mislead Michigan voters will be met with swift and severe consequences,” Nessel said.

“This effort specifically targeted minority voters in an attempt to deter them from voting in the November election. We’re all well aware of the frustrations caused by the millions of nuisance robocalls flooding our cell phones and landlines each day, but this particular message poses grave consequences for our democracy and the principles upon which it was built,” Nessel added. “Michigan voters are entitled to a full, free and fair election in November and my office will not hesitate to pursue those who jeopardize that.” 

VIEW THE CHARGING DOCUMENTS HERE.

LISTEN TO THE ROBOCALL HERE

Moreover, Nessel’s office had communicated with attorneys general offices in New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Illinois, all of which reported similar robocalls being made to residents. An investigation uncovered that the calls were made to people who live in urban areas with significant minority populations, the press release stated.

In my opinion, whether you’re a Republican or Democrat, any attempt to purposefully deceive voters is wrong. These two allegedly crossed all kinds of lines of deception. There are legitimate concerns with universal mail-in-voting but not what Wohl and Burkman stated in their intimidating call to residents.

“It’s believed around 85,000 calls were made nationally, though an exact breakdown of the numbers of calls to each city or state are not available,” the press release stated.

In Michigan, the robocall, which the attorney general made public, is filled with intimidation tactics and could land both of the alleged perpetrators in prison for years, the attorney general said.

I this is Tomeka Taylor from Project 1599 civil rights organization founded by Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl,” it says. “Mail in voting sounds great but did you know that if you vote by mail your personal information will be part of a public database that will be used by police departments to track down old warrants and be used by credit card companies to collect outstanding debts the CDC. is even pushing to use record for mailing voting to track people for mandatory vaccines. Don’t be finessed into giving your private information to the man to stay safe and be aware of vote by mail.

Wohl and Burkman’s claims are false. Moreover, the pair are not civil rights advocates.

However, there are other legitimate concerns being raised by opponents of mail-in-voting that are currently being litigated in court rooms across the country.

Laws Wohl and Burkman allegedly broke

  • One count of election law – intimidating voters, a five-year felony;
  • One count of conspiracy to commit an election law violation, a five-year felony;
  • One count of using a computer to commit the crime of election law – intimidating voters, a seven-year felony; and
  • Using a computer to commit the crime of conspiracy, a seven-year felony. 
     

“The charges were filed today in the 36th District Court in Detroit,” stated a press release from the Michigan attorney general’s office. “Arraignment is pending for the defendants. The Attorney General’s office will be working – with local law enforcement if necessary – to secure the appearance of each defendant in Michigan. It’s too early to say if formal extradition will be necessary or if they will present themselves here voluntarily in the very near future.”

The press release stated that Burkman, who is an Arlington, Virginia resident, and Wohl, a Los Angeles, California resident, allegedly attempted to “discourage voters from participating in the general election by creating and funding a robocall targeted at certain urban areas, including Detroit. The calls were made in late August and went out to nearly 12,000 residents with phone numbers from the 313 area code.”

FROM THE PRESS RELEASE

The recorded robocall message warns people about being “finessed into giving your private information to the man” and urges them to “beware of vote by mail.” 

The caller, who claims to be associated with an organization founded by Burkman and Wohl, falsely tells people that mail-in voting, in particular, will allow personal information to become part of a special database used by police to track down old warrants and by credit card companies to collect outstanding debts. The caller also deceptively claims the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will use the information to track people for mandatory vaccines. However, none of that is true. 

The Attorney General encourages anyone who received this call on or about Aug. 26 and who wishes to file a complaint about it to contact her office by calling 517-335-7650. 

Information callers may be asked to provide in their complaint will include:  

  • Complainant’s name, address and contact information; 
  • Date and time of when the robocall was received; 
  • Phone number of the line where the call was received; 
  • Number displayed on caller ID when the call was received; 
  • Whether the robocall went to voicemail or was answered live; 
  • The complainant’s recollection of the robocall content and their thoughts about the call; 
  • Whether the complainant is and has been a Michigan resident for six months or more; and 
  • Whether the complainant is a registered voter or is eligible to vote. 

There is very little, if any, evidence to substantiate claims that mail-in ballots lead to fraud, as many states have successfully conducted the process for years. Michigan has had absentee voting for more than 60 years. In November 2018, Michigan voters overwhelmingly approved Proposal 3, which amended Michigan’s Constitution and gave all Michigan voters the constitutional right to vote by absentee ballot without excuse. 

You may like

Continue Reading

Elections

Biden’s Poor Polling and Harris’ Low Electability Rating Could Have Democrats Considering ‘Nuclear Option’

Behind-the-scenes discussion of how Democrats could arrive at a third option for the next election is underway

Published

on

Biden Kamala
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

With polls consistently showing a poor approval rating for President Joe Biden at below 40 percent, and a recent poll put Kamala Harris’ electability at only 28 percent, Democrats are in full panic mode.

Behind-the-scenes discussion of how Democrats could arrive at a third option for the next election is underway. Operatives are preparing for the possibility of a contested presidential primary in which other would-be nominees take on Ms. Harris, but that could be damaging for the party” reports the Telegraph.

Therefore, Democrats are allegedly whispering about a potential “nuclear option” that would call for current Vice President Harris to be nominated to the Supreme Court. The Telegraph writes that “while the scenario is highly improbable, and perhaps a reflection of a Washington rumor mill in overdrive, the fact it has come up at all shows the depths of the predicament the Biden administration currently finds itself in, amid rising inflation, a stalled domestic agenda, and foreign policy disasters.”

The theory in question would call for President Biden to nominate Harris to the Supreme Court in the event a seat opens in the next three years during his administration. Biden could then use “Section 2 of the 25thAmendment to nominate a more popular vice president”, adds the Telegraph.

Under Section 1 of the 25th Amendment, that new vice president could assume the presidency if Biden were to step down while president. They would then become the Democratic nominee in the 2024 presidential election. That same individual could also be the presumptive Democratic nominee in 2024 if Biden chooses not to run for re-election.

One piece of information that is wetting Democrats’ whistle is that current Supreme Court Justice Breyer has said he does not “want to stay on the Supreme Court until I die.”

The Telegraph notes that “the discussion over potential successors to Mr. Biden is highly unusual less than a year into an administration.”

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending