Connect with us

Economy

Denver Mayor announces first round of cuts; blames Republicans for needing to spend $180 million on migrants

Published

on

Denver is making huge cuts in order to pay for the overwhelming amount of migrants who have flooded the city. Denver Mayor Mike Johnston announced the first changes will be to reduce costs at Denver Motor Vehicle offices and the Department of Parks and Recreation. Those will be the first $5 million in savings and more cuts will be coming.

The Center Square reports that as part of the reductions, the Denver Motor Vehicle offices will no longer take vehicle registration renewals in person and drivers must complete registrations by mail, online or at kiosks. Five locations will have rotating weekly closures.

Spring recreation programming will be reduced by 25%. Recreation centers will go from operating seven days per week to six and neighborhood centers will be reduce hours of operation.

The city also plans to make changes to migrant services provided and decrease the number of newcomers served. Denver has supported 38,380 migrants at a cost of more than $42 million during the last few months, according to Johnston’s office.

Johnston has been begging the federal government for more money and claiming it is Republicans who are to blame for the liberal city’s mess. “I’m here to talk about the devastating impact of the failure of Republican leadership in Congress this week to pass comprehensive immigration changes and the impact that will have on both city budgets and on services that we can provide for newcomers in the city,” Johnston said to open the press conference.

“Despite broad bipartisan support, I think [former President Donald] Trump and Republican leaders saw this as a chance that, if this bill actually passed, it would have successfully solved the problem facing cities on the border,” Johnston said. “They would have rather seen it fail so they could exacerbate these problems, extend the suffering of American people and of newcomers for their own electoral chances in this November.”

“This was solvable with bipartisan support and we would not be facing these challenges,” Johnston said. “I want to be clear to Denverites: Who is not responsible for this crisis we’re in? The folks who have walked 3,000 miles to get to this city.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Economy

FEMA Supervisor Claims Avoidance of Trump Supporters Was Not an Isolated Incident

Published

on

Marn’i Washington, the former Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) supervisor fired for instructing workers to avoid homes displaying Trump campaign signs, stated on Tuesday that the incident was part of a larger pattern of political bias within the agency. Washington, who previously served as a Disaster Survivor Assistance crew leader in Highland County, Florida, called the occurrence a “colossal event” that extended beyond Florida, affecting other states like North and South Carolina after hurricanes devastated the region.

According to the Daily Caller News Foundation, Washington’s comments came in an interview with journalist Roland Martin, where she described the practice as part of a broader trend within FEMA, alleging that it had occurred in multiple states, particularly in areas that had supported President Donald Trump. “If you look at the record, there is what we call a community trend,” Washington said, suggesting that FEMA’s actions weren’t isolated. “FEMA always preaches avoidance first and then deescalation. This is not isolated. This is a colossal event of avoidance not just in the state of Florida, but you will find avoidance in the Carolinas.”

Washington’s remarks stem from an incident in which her team, while canvassing for hurricane relief in Lake Placid, Florida, was instructed to avoid homes with Trump signage. According to reports, the move resulted in at least 20 homes with Trump-related signs or flags being skipped over for disaster relief assistance between late October and November. These actions were allegedly in line with a set of “best practices” that included safety tips alongside the politically charged directive to avoid Trump supporters.

Washington clarified that the guidance came from higher-ups in FEMA, including Chad Hershey, her supervisor, who reportedly instructed staff to bypass homes they deemed unsafe due to hostile encounters with residents. “We will canvass at [homes] that do not have the community trend with the Trump campaign signage,” Washington explained. “If any of those residents come outside and say ‘hey, I want to register,’ we’ll welcome them into our arms… But we were not going to subject our people to continue with verbal abuse or hostile encounters.”

The former supervisor emphasized that her team experienced verbal abuse from residents who displayed Trump campaign signs on their properties, leading to her instruction to avoid those homes entirely. Washington also mentioned that her team was instructed to log reasons for skipping homes, with notes like “Trump sign no entry per leadership,” “Trump sign, no stop Trump flag,” and “Trump sign, no contact per leadership” appearing in the records. These notes were reportedly made in Highlands County, a region where nearly 70% of residents voted for Trump.

The controversial directive came in the wake of Hurricanes Helene and Milton, which struck the area in October, leaving millions without power and causing approximately $50 billion in economic damage, as reported by President Joe Biden. FEMA has not denied the incident but has indicated it is taking steps to address the matter. Hershey confirmed to the Daily Wire that the agency was “aware” of the incident and is taking “immediate action.”

Washington’s firing has drawn attention to possible partisan practices within federal agencies. While she defended her actions as being in response to a difficult environment, she also criticized FEMA’s leadership for allegedly not addressing the broader issue of political bias within the agency. Washington’s claims have sparked broader questions about the extent of political influence in government disaster relief efforts and whether such biases might impact the fairness of assistance distribution in future emergencies.

Continue Reading

Trending