Connect with us

Elections

Dem Operative Admits To Committing Voter Fraud And Warns It Could Change Election Outcomes In November

Published

on

Screen Shot 2020 08 04 at 4.01.15 PM

An anonymous Democratic operative admitted to the New York Post his role in committing voter fraud for decades and says it should concern Americans in the upcoming November election, according to a New York Post exclusive.

“An election that is swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes — it can make a difference,” the source told the Post. “It could be enough to flip states.”

The source added, “This is a real thing. And there is going to be a f–king war coming November 3rd over this stuff … If they knew how the sausage was made, they could fix it.”

With the epidemic of COVID-19, many state and local leaders aren’t so keen on their residents going to the polls to vote in the 2020 presidential election. In fact, some states have said they’re providing mail-in ballots to all registered voters to mitigate the spread of the novel virus.

President Donald Trump and other Republicans have warned that the process for sweeping mail-in voting could disenfranchise voters because, unlike absentee ballots, which are requested by voters and are only granted for those with legitimate reasons to not vote in person, vote by mail involves sending ballots to all eligible voters without any explanation from the voter.

Many Democrats, however, argue that voter fraud is a myth. And House Speaker Nancy Pelosi earlier suggested it’s Trump’s strategy to ‘suppress’ voters.

The Trump Campaign and the Republican National Committee are fighting legal battles with many states to restore election integrity in November. Moreover, they’ve already won in seven states, including New Mexico and Pennsylvania.

“…the political insider, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he fears prosecution, said fraud is more the rule than the exception. His dirty work has taken him through the weeds of municipal and federal elections in Paterson, Atlantic City, Camden, Newark, Hoboken and Hudson County and his fingerprints can be found in local legislative, mayoral and congressional races across the Garden State. Some of the biggest names and highest office holders in New Jersey have benefited from his tricks, according to campaign records The Post reviewed,” New York Post reports.

You may like

Continue Reading

Elections

Videotapes from Jan. 6 Committee Witness Interviews Vanish

Published

on

Screen Shot 2021 01 06 at 10.13.23 AM scaled

Videotapes containing witness interviews conducted by the Democrat-led January 6 congressional committee have disappeared. The chairman of the House Administration oversight subcommittee, Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.), expressed his apprehension on the “Just the News, No Noise” television show.

According to Loudermilk, all videotapes of depositions have vanished, raising questions about the preservation of crucial evidence. He argued that, under House rules, these tapes qualified as congressional evidence, especially since some clips were aired during hearings. Loudermilk contended that the tapes should have been preserved by the now-defunct Jan. 6 committee and its chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.).

Loudermilk’s revelation has broader implications, potentially impacting criminal trials in both state court in Georgia and federal court in Washington, where individuals, including former President Donald Trump, face charges related to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021. Notably, Trump’s legal team had recently requested evidence from the Jan. 6 committee but was denied by a judge.

The situation takes a further twist as Loudermilk disclosed that the J6 committee had sent certain evidence, such as transcripts, to the Biden White House and the Homeland Security Department. Shockingly, these transcripts have now been returned to Loudermilk’s GOP-led subcommittee almost entirely redacted, preventing the disclosure of their contents.

The lack of records regarding witnesses, their statements, and the extensive redactions have raised concerns among House Republicans. Loudermilk emphasized that these documents belong to the House and should not have been sent in such a heavily redacted form. The chairman questioned the motives behind the redactions, asking why a Democrat-run House was allowed to have unredacted documents while a Republican committee’s efforts were obstructed. This development adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing investigations into the events surrounding January 6, 2021.

You may like

Continue Reading

Trending