Connect with us

Featured

Retired U.K. Defense official examines national security implications of UFOs

Published

on

Screenshot 2020 04 27 14.01.56

What are UFOs, unidentified objects, in the sky that have officials within the U.S. Defense Department deeply concerned? Why did the U.S. military deny for decades that these objects were real? Why did U.S. Officials deny eyewitness accounts of very real phenomena in our skies?

Did the U.S. government hide two major crashes of these anomalous objects and the possible extraction of alien lifeforms? Why are the sightings of these observable intelligent objects being documented more and more around nuclear sites all over the world?

U.S. Defense and Intelligence officials have finally come clean that these are very real questions and the  national security implications are genuine. In December, news broke that included in the 2,000 page National Defense Authorization Act was a provision that mandates the establishment of a specific department within the DOD to study the UAPs. It is a similar office to the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP program)  that The New York Times revealed in its exclusive and was confirmed by Luis Elizondo, who headed that program under the DOD.

I’ve also done numerous podcast interviews with Elizondo about the issue.

On my latest #TheSaraCarterShow podcast update, however, I interview Nick Pope, a retired U.K. Defense Official that oversaw the British Defense Ministries, secretive UFO desk. He spoke in detail about the recent U.S. legislation mandating research in the field as, ‘groundbreaking.’

The bill “is the most comprehensive set of legislative mandates that we’ve ever seen on this,” said Pope, from his home in Northern California. 

“There was some material in the last defense bill. But but this is like that one put on steroids,” Pope added. “I mean, it calls for the DOD and the military and the intelligence community and other stakeholders to basically make a joined up effort across government to get to the bottom of the UAP mystery. And it takes about the need for a science plan. And for everyone to finally work together and find out what’s going on in our airspace.” 

What makes this DOD bill incredible is that it calls for the investigation into the reportedly serious health issues of people who have come into contact with these unidentified objects, such as the case more than 40 years ago in the Rendelsham Forest area, in Great Britain, where U.S.Air Force Officials, stationed at RAF Woodbridge,  said they encountered unidentified objects that operated without sound and did not appear to be any known technology. One of the officials, described to the CIA and other Defense officials in detail one of the objects, which he said had markings on the outside that appeared to be symbols.

Pope described the importance of the Rendelsham Forest case and why that case made it impossible for the U.S. or British government to deny such an incident.

“It’s not just hearsay, we’ve got an audit trail of verifiable government documents, both from the United States and the United Kingdom, including a report from the deputy base Commander, Colonel Charles Halt. And he’s very clear, he talks about a structured, apparently metallic craft, again, under intelligent control performing speeds and maneuvers that seem to go way ahead of anything that we have in our inventory.”Halt is a retired United States Air Force colonel and a former deputy base commander at RAF Bentwaters, near Woodbridge, Suffolk.

“This thing was briefly tracked on radar, it fired beams of light down into the weapons storage area, which some claim affected the ordinance in some way,” Pope continued. “And there were physical ground traces in terms of radioactivity levels, which seemed significantly higher than the average background.” 

Pope emphasized, “what’s remarkable about this case is it bridges the historical with the more modern, because clearly the the Pentagon’s UAP Task Force, now replaced by arrow, the old domain anomaly resolution office we’re clearly aware of, of this incident.” 

The bill also requires the new DOD UAP office to study what it describes as ‘transmedium objects’ which are those that have appeared and according to official documents, allegedly interacted with our nuclear facilities both in the U.S. and in Russia, according to the NDAA. 

As to whether humanity will ever make contact in our lifetime. Pope believes so but he hypothesizes that advanced life forms may be monitoring us, much like the writers of Star Trek hypothesized that advanced life forms may not want to interfere with developing civilizations. The advancement of nuclear technology, however, may have changed all that, he said.  

“The answer might be something along those lines, that too, in a universe, nearly 14 billion years old, there might be ancient, ancient civilizations out there with technology, millions and millions of years ahead of us and to civilizations like that,” he said. “A newly emerging civilization, like us might be one of the last truly interesting things in the cosmos. And they might not want that sort of cultural contamination that would come with first contact, they might want to watch us and say, you know, look at this amazing, but often frustrating, sometimes scary, sometimes wonderful species called humanity. Let’s watch them and see where they go, what path they choose, rather than just, you know, landing on the White House lawn and bringing us into the Federation.” 

If you want the full interview with me and Nick Pope go to the #TheSaraCarterShow podcast. I believe, as an investigative columnist and Earthling, that it is imperative that we investigate these unexplained sightings.

It does no good to put our heads in the sand and pretend that what is happening in our sky isn’t real and humanity deserves to know the truth.

You can follow @SaraCarterDC on Twitter or @SaraCarterOfficial on Truth 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Mayorkas Border Manifesto: Why the DHS Secretary must be impeached

If this isn’t a reason to impeach Mayorkas, I don’t know what is.

Published

on

Alejandro Mayorkas

Listen to “The Smoking Gun: The Mayorkas Memo Telling Border Patrol to Stop Doing Its Job” on Spreaker.

DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas issued a memorandum to top DHS officials on Sept 30, 2021, that set the stage for an open border policy that has resulted in the most dangerous national security situation the United States has ever confronted. That seven-page letter, written by Mayorkas and obtained by this columnist, is an open borders blueprint and reveals his purposeful failure to secure the southern border. Numerous retired and current DHS officials said it is sufficient enough for Congress to impeach him.

The Mayorkas policy, which has perpetuated a tsunami of people from all over the world to illegally enter the United States, is simplified and made clear in his memorandum. It is so direct that it is easy to see why the policy overrides almost all U.S. immigration laws by pushing all federal immigration agencies under DHS to exercise  “prosecutorial discretion” [ not the law ] to assess whether those who enter the country illegally should be given the right to stay, despite any criminal background or failure to qualify for asylum.

Some of the memo’s contents have been openly discussed by Mayorkas under questioning by lawmakers at hearings. Even parts of the policies have been exposed in reports but what makes this memo unique is that it is the roadmap the Biden Administration used to implement this failed open border policy that has become the biggest concern for most American voters.

And Mayorkas is the architect of the policy. It is a policy that fails to uphold the Constitution, and current immigration laws and turns Federal law enforcement officers and agents into de facto human traffickers.

“In exercising our discretion, we are guided by the fact that the majority of undocumented noncitizens who could be subject to removal have been contributing members of our communities for years,” states Mayorkas, as he goes on to list all the possible jobs illegal aliens are doing in the nation. “The fact an individual is removable noncitizen therefore should not alone be the basis of an enforcement action against them. We will use our discretion and focus our enforcement resources in a more targeted way.”

Those ‘targeted resources’ Mayorkas was referring to have mostly been directed at processing illegal migrants into the country and not deporting those breaking the law, according to lawmakers and DHS officials who spoke with me. I’ve documented for the past three years on both Fox News’ Sean Hannity and on SaraACarter.com the enormous resources used not to deport but to import illegal aliens into the country.

Rep. Andy Biggs, who is currently co-chair of the Border Security Caucus and the House Judiciary Committee, where he is the Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance. told me Sunday that the memo in its entirety is Mayorka’s ideological push for open borders and it’s “his philosophy, cobbled together in place…the letter reflects his distorted thinking on border security.”

Mayorkas’ ‘distorted thinking’ has now led to calls for his impeachment. There are currently two articles of impeachment against Mayorkas. The articles charge him with “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” and a “breach of public trust.” This memo alone is evidence of that breach with the American public.

In the first article, the Republicans with the House Homeland Security Committee state that Mayorkas “has repeatedly violated laws enacted by Congress regarding immigration and border security…His refusal to obey the law is not only an offense against the separation of powers in the Constitution of the United States, it also threatens our national security and has had a dire impact on communities across the country.”

Republicans accused Mayorkas in the second impeachment article of “knowingly making false statements to Congress and the American people and avoiding lawful oversight to obscure the devastating consequences of his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law and carry out his statutory duties.” And although the feckless Senate may not have the votes to make the impeachment stick, it will expose those Republicans who truly are open borders advocates from those who believe in the Constitution and the rule of law. It would require a two-thirds majority to convict and remove Mayorkas from office.

If there was ever a reason for impeachment, Mayorkas fits the bill. His impeachment will send a clear message to the Biden Administration and Senators on both sides of the aisle that gig is up and that our nation’s security must be the priority.

Mayorkas ushered in the administration’s expansive use of  “prosecutorial discretion”  that allowed our borders to become an open gateway for our adversaries, drug cartels, terrorists and people from all over the world, stated Joel Maldonado, a recently retired Border Patrol Supervisor, who spoke for the first time about the memo to me on, The Sara Carter Show podcast Sunday.

“When we are not upholding the law but being forced to commit treason it puts everyone at risk, it’s demoralizing and they are lying to the American people,” said Maldonado, who published his first book on his 28 years with the Border Patrol, A Binding Oath: A Border Patrol Journey and the Mayorkas Effect. 

Maldonado, who retired in March 2023, had never seen the Mayorkas memo until this year. He said it coincided with the policy his station in Texas had to abide by and a dangerous policy “that continues to this day.”

GettyImages 1246358176

Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

“The memo itself is a smoking gun, it’s proof that the administration usurped the law with this prosecutorial discretion policy, along with so much more,’ he said. He described how he and other supervisors would put agents out on the border to conduct enforcement instead of using them all for processing illegal aliens into the country when directed to do so by DHS. He said “We would do this out of sight of Washington D.C. and DHS but then be scolded later if we increased our apprehensions. They wanted us to process and they didn’t care how many more people came in or what the consequences would be.”

The seven-page memo was emailed from Mayorkas to Director Tae Johnson, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; Acting Commissioner Troy Miller, U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Director Ur Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Robert Silvers, Under Secretary of Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans; Katherine Culliton-Gonzalez, Officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and Lynne Parker Dupree, Chief Privacy Officer with the Privacy Office.

Many areas of the memo are striking but one that stood out was the list of reasons and excuses that Mayorkas gives can be used when attempting to not deport illegal aliens that clearly present a danger to the nation or have violated U.S. law.

This memo “brings to the forefront the official policy of Alejandro Mayorkas to open wide our southern border,” Biggs stated, adding that he believes Congress has the votes to impeach the DHS Secretary.

One of the most stunning parts of the memo refers to the ‘threat to public safety.’  Mayorkas said those threats possibly posed by illegal aliens are ‘not to be determined according to bright lines or categories. Instead, it requires an assessment of the individual and the totality of the facts and circumstances.’

He lists reasons for enforcement action, such as, “sophistication of criminal offense, use or threatened use of a firearm or dangerous weapon, serious prior criminal record” but then follows with mitigating reasons as to what could constitute a reason not to deport them.

He states,  “There can be mitigating factors that militate in favor of declining enforcement action: 

  • advance or tender age
  • lengthy presence in the United States
  • a mental condition that may have contributed to the criminal conduct, or a physical or mental condition requiring care or treatment
  • Status as a victim of crime or victim, witness, or legal party in legal proceedings,
  • the impact of removal on family in the United States, such as loss of a provider or caregiver,
  • whether the noncitizen may be eligible for humanitarian protection or other immigration relief
  • military or other public service of the noncitizen or their immediate family;
  • time since an offense and evidence of rehabilitation;
  • conviction was vacated or expunged

Maldonado said the list of excuses to allow illegal criminals to stay “is basically a strict warning to supervisors” in Border Patrol, ICE and other agencies that deportation was no longer a priority. The priority was ensuring that those who came in illegally stayed in the country, regardless of status, asylum claims or failure to properly vet them for national security threats.

What’s more disturbing in the Mayorkas border manifesto – is not just how he ties the hands of federal agents and risks the national security of our nation – but how he exonerates himself and the Biden Administration from any possible repercussions due to a dangerous open border policy.

“The civil immigration enforcement does not compel an action to be taken or not taken. Instead, the guidance leaves the exercise of prosecutorial discretion to the judgment of our personnel,” Mayorkas states.

Maldonado, and numerous other retired and current Border Patrol supervisors and agents, told me this guidance gives the federal officials – including Mayorkas – cover,  by putting the onus on the federal law enforcement officers who are forced to process people into the nation, and not the administration’s policy.

One current ICE supervisor, who spoke on condition of anonymity, summed it up by saying, “It means if anything goes wrong – if there’s a terror attack or something of that magnitude because of what Mayorkas has done – it will be the poor BP agent or ICE officer that will be blamed…Even though we have been the ones forced to let in the criminals and terrorists because of Mayorkas’ policy.”

If that isn’t a reason to impeach Mayorkas, I don’t know what is.

Follow Sara A. Carter on X at @SaraCarterDC 

Continue Reading

Trending