Connect with us

Nation

Deadline Passes in Epstein Case: Names of Associates Still Shrouded in Secrecy

Published

on

In a legal saga that has captivated public attention, a crucial deadline has come and gone in the unsealing of nearly 200 names connected to the notorious sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. While court officials initially indicated that the unsealing process would commence today, the legal team representing Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most vocal accusers, warns that the documents might not see the light of day until next week.

The Jan. 1 deadline marked the end of the appeal period for John and Jane Does, individuals associated with Epstein, in a lawsuit against his convicted sex-trafficking accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. However, the court’s order lacked specific details about the timing of the next crucial step – the preparation and unsealing of documents containing the names of Epstein’s former associates, friends, employees, accusers, and potential accomplices.

According to reports from Fox News, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska’s 51-page order from last month granted a two-week window for those named in connection to a 2015 lawsuit filed by Giuffre against Maxwell. The order stipulated that after this period, the legal teams were to confer, prepare the unsealing documents, and post them on the docket.

While the majority of the individuals, known as John and Jane Does, were not publicly identified in Giuffre’s lawsuit, Judge Preska ruled that their ties to Epstein were “widely publicized,” justifying the disclosure of their identities. Notable figures expected to be on the list include Prince Andrew, former President Clinton’s Prince Andrew aide, and possibly Clinton himself, according to reports from ABC News.

A significant exception to the unsealing pertains to “J. Doe 107.” Although not explicitly mentioned in the judge’s December order, her attorney sought a 30-day extension to present arguments for keeping her identity sealed. Judge Preska granted her until Jan. 22 to submit an affidavit, and documents related to Doe 107 will remain confidential until then.

The Epstein-related legal web extends beyond Giuffre’s case, involving lawsuits against JPMorgan Chase, alleging the bank aided Epstein’s crimes, and accusations against billionaire Leon Black. Meanwhile, Ghislaine Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, and Prince Andrew settled his lawsuit with Giuffre, maintaining his denial of any wrongdoing.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the public remains on edge, awaiting the revelation of names that could shed light on the extent of Epstein’s network and the high-profile individuals entangled within it.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nation

BREAKING: Trump Assassination Attempt Hearing Turns Into Screaming Match

Published

on

What was supposed to be a hearing on the Secret Service agency’s failures leading to two assassination attempts against President-elect Trump, led to a shouting match on Capitol Hill. Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe, “shouted at Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, after the GOP lawmaker lambasted the service for security lapses that made Trump a target of two failed shooting attempts” according to Fox News, which details:

The outburst happened after Fallon showed a picture of Presidents Biden and Trump at a 9/11 commemoration ceremony this year and suggested that as the Special Agent in Charge of that detail, Rowe should have been close enough to Biden to be in the picture. Rowe was not pictured.

“Who is usually at an event like this closest to the President of the United States?” Fallon asked, pointing at the photo. “Were you the special agent in charge of the detail that day?”

Rowe said the security detail was present but out of view of the camera. As he spoke, he became enraged and accused Fallon of using 9/11 for political purposes.

“That is the day where we remember more than 3,000 people that have died on 9/11. I actually responded to Ground Zero,” Rowe said. “I was there going through the ashes of the World Trade Center.”

“I’m not asking that, I’m asking you, if you were… were you the special agent in charge!?” Fallon interrupted, shouting at Rowe.

Rowe raised his voice in response. “I was there to show respect for a Secret Service member that died on 9/11!” he yelled back.

“Do not invoke 9/11 for political purposes!” Rowe screamed at the lawmaker.

“I’m not,” Fallon fired back, as the committee chairman demanded order and banged his gavel.

“You are, sir. You are out of line, congressman!” Rowe fumed. “Way out of line.”

Fallon then accused Rowe of “playing politics” by refusing to answer his question.

“I am a public servant who has served this nation,” Rowe retorted, saying he served on the nation’s “darkest day.”

“You will not politicize it!” Rowe thundered.

WATCH EXCHANGE: FOX NEWS

Continue Reading

Trending