Connect with us

COVID-19

Celebs party like it’s pre-pandemic at Super Bowl, no masks in sight

Published

on

If you watched the star-studded Super Bowl attendance in Los Angeles Sunday night, you might think you were watching a pre-pandemic game. Not a single celebrity seemed to even have a mask anywhere in site. What one certainly would not think is that the game is taking place in a state which proudly declares itself in a “state of emergency.”

As the sleuths of the internet picked up, Ellen DeGeneres and her wife were enjoying the game maskless. If you attend Ellen’s show in the audience, however, attendees are all given masks to wear. Saying the left is hypocritical is just beating a dead horse. We already know this.

Conservative host Clay Travis tweeted “Here’s the video of every celebrity without a mask during the Super Bowl. But every kid in California will have to be wearing them tomorrow in school. They must all be holding their breaths the entire game.”

“Hollywood stars who have been vocal in their support for mask mandates were content not to wear them, sparking widespread anger on Twitter” reports the Daily Mail, which noted that California’s mask mandate still states: “Masks are required for all individuals in all indoor public settings, regardless of vaccination status from December 15, 2021 through February 15, 2022.”

California’s rules will not change until tomorrow, Tuesday, and will make only unvaccinated people wear face masks in indoor public settings. Among the maskless high-profile celebrities were Kendall Jenner, Hailey and Justin Bieber, Matt Damon, Charlize Theron, Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck.

Daily Mail added that even with Tuesday’s new rules, “the guidance states: ‘Fully vaccinated individuals are recommended to continue indoor masking when the risk may be high’ – as in a crowd, like on Sunday night” where 70,000 people gathered at Los Angeles’ SoFi Stadium.

See all the hypocritical celebrities here: Daily Mail

Continue Reading
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. lu mahalo

    February 14, 2022 at 5:56 pm

    “Ellen DeGeneres and her wife…” What’s wrong with this picture?

  2. K Misek

    February 14, 2022 at 7:59 pm

    Rules for thee, but not for me. Hollywood, home to actors with rattlesnake tongue and fangs. The ones who rattle and hiss the loudest have the biggest deception to hide. Sounds like the DC’s brood of vipers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

COVID-19

Former Harvard medical professor says he was fired for opposing Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates

Published

on

Covid

“My hope is that someday, Harvard will find its way back to academic freedom and independence.” That is the heartfelt message from Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a former Harvard University professor of medicine since 2003, who recently announced publicly he was fired for “clinging to the truth” in his opposition to Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

Kulldorff posted the news on social media alongside an essay published in the City Journal last week. The epidemiologist and biostatistician also spoke with National Review about the incident. Kulldorff says he was fired by the Harvard-affiliated Mass General Brigham hospital system and put on a leave of absence by Harvard Medical School in November 2021 over his stance on Covid.

Nearly two years later, in October 2023, his leave of absence was terminated as a matter of policy, marking the end of his time at the university. Harvard severed ties with Kulldorff “all on their initiative,” he said.

The history of the medical professional’s public stance on Covid-19 vaccines and mandates is detailed by National Review:

Censorship and rejection led Kulldorff to co-author the Great Barrington Declaration in October 2020 alongside Dr. Sunetra Gupta of Oxford University and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University. Together, the three public-health scientists argued for limited and targeted Covid-19 restrictions that “protect the elderly, while letting children and young adults live close to normal lives,” as Kulldorff put it in his essay.

“The declaration made clear that no scientific consensus existed for school closures and many other lockdown measures. In response, though, the attacks intensified—and even grew slanderous,” he wrote, naming former National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins as the one who ordered a “devastating published takedown” of the declaration.

Testifying before Congress in January, Collins reaffirmed his previous statements attacking the Great Barrington Declaration.

Despite the coordinated effort against it, the document has over 939,000 signatures in favor of age-based focused protection.

The Great Barrington Declaration’s authors, who advocated the quick reopening of schools, have been vindicated by recent studies that confirm pandemic-era school closures were, in fact, detrimental to student learning. The data show that students from third through eighth grade who spent most of the 2020–21 school year in remote learning fell more than half a grade behind in math scores on average, while those who attended school in person dropped a little over a third of a grade, according to a New York Times review of existing studies. In addition to learning losses, school closures did very little to stop the spread of Covid, studies show.

Continue Reading

Trending