Connect with us


CA Female Judge Rejects Law Mandating Businesses put Women on Boards



Screen Shot 2020 11 23 at 1.40.04 PM

Liberal California lawmakers passed a law requiring companies in the state to put female directors on their boards, but it was struck down in “the second legal setback in as many months for efforts to mandate board diversity” reports The Wall Street Journal.

The law required all public companies headquartered in California to have “at least two or three women on their boards by 2021, depending on the size of the board.” Penalties would be enacted for those who did not abide.

Conservative group Judicial Watch challenged the mandate on behalf of three California residents. Judge Duffy-Lewis wrote in her 23-page verdict that “the plaintiff’s evidence is compelling” but rejected the state’s argument that the lawsuit was premature because penalties or threatened prosecution had not yet occurred.

“The court eviscerated California’s unconstitutional gender quota mandate,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

WSJ wrote about similar cases:

Last month, another judge in the same state court struck down a law that required public companies in California to have at least one racially, ethnically or otherwise diverse director by 2021. Judge Terry Green said that law improperly mandated heterogeneous boards and must protect the right of individuals to equal treatment. That lawsuit was also backed by Judicial Watch.

Other litigation challenges a Nasdaq listing requirement approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission in August 2021. That provision requires companies to disclose board diversity details starting in August and, starting in 2023, to include on their boards at least one director who identifies as female, as a member of an underrepresented ethnic or racial minority, or as lesbian, gay, transgender or queer. By 2025, boards must include two such directors. Companies can sidestep the board membership requirement if they disclose why they have done so.


You may like

Continue Reading


  1. Curmudgeon

    May 18, 2022 at 11:54 am

    As a former board member of 4 organizations, a board is charged with governance of an organization. The decision of the board is the decision of all board members. In some fiduciary matters, board members can be personally sued for decisions. Unless a board member specifically requests his vote to be recorded as being not in favour of the decision, that board member can be sued as well. Where this is going, is that as a board member, it made no difference to me what another board member’s race, creed, colour, or religion was. My only interest was could the individual understand what the “business” of the organization was, and how he or she processed information coming to the board. Over 15 years of being a member of 2 boards, they changed from large majority male boards to small minority female boards, and the number of “minorities” remained roughly the same. Those boards functioned well, irrespective of the composition, because it people understood the “business” and their roles in it. Forcing board composition is contrary to the best interests of that organization, whether private sector, public sector, business sector, or charitable organization.

  2. Stephane

    May 20, 2022 at 4:40 am

    If a company is formed by a group of lesbians who hate non lesbians, they then have to accept a heterosexual man in their board?
    If a company directing its business to homosexual mysogynistic men does not take in a heterosexual woman on its board, they are not lawful?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Five returned rental cars used by Biden’s Secret Service burst into flames



Screen Shot 2022 12 04 at 1.59.43 PM

A bizarre situation involving rental cars used during one of President Joe Biden’s trips has social media and conspiracy theorists busy with speculation.

The day after President Joe Biden left Nantucket for his Thanksgiving holiday, five Hertz rental cars hired by his Secret Service detail burst into flames in the airport parking lot.

The Nantucket Current tweeted out photos and wrote, “The cars were owned by Hertz, and had just been returned by members of the Secret Service who had been using them during President Biden’s visit, sources said.”

A fire “involving multiple rental vehicles recently used by Secret Service agents erupted early Monday morning at Nantucket Memorial Airport,” reported the Current.

According to a statement from Nantucket Memorial Airport, at 5:22 a.m. on Monday, airport staff observed an active fire through the closed circuit TV system in the rental car overflow area. Local fire and police departments responded and contained the fire.

“Something very fishy going on,” one YouTube user commented on the Nantucket Current’s video. “No freakin’ way was this a coincidence. Absolutely no way,” wrote another.

An investigation is underway. The working theory is that the fire started in a Ford Expedition, which was under a safety recall since May due to a faulty battery junction box that has been known to cause underhood fires. The recall affects 66,000 Ford Expeditions and Lincoln Navigators manufactured between December 2020 and April 2021.

“We believe these vehicle fires can be traced to a circuit board supplier that changed manufacturing locations during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic,” according to Ford’s website. “The printed circuit boards produced there are sometimes susceptible to a high-current short.”

“Of the eight fire allegations, six occurred while the vehicle was parked and off, and two occurred while driving,” says the initial March 2022 report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the part of the Department of Transportation that investigates car safety issues. Interestingly, the eight vehicles were owned by multiple rental car companies at various locations.

By mid-May, the government had 16 reports of underhood fires in 2021 Expedition and Navigator vehicles. Of those, 14 were rental vehicles and 12 of the fires had occurred while the vehicle was parked with the engine off. Consequently, Ford has advised owners that these vehicles should be parked outdoors and away from buildings.

In an email to Forbes, Hertz confirmed that it was working with the local authorities on their investigation but did not confirm that the Explorer in question had been scheduled for service under the recall.


You may like

Continue Reading

Trending Now



Proudly Made In America | © 2022 M3 Media Management, LLC