Connect with us

Politics

Black Virginia Republican Rejected from Liberal Black Caucus

Published

on

Screen Shot 2022 02 04 at 4.07.25 PM

The Virginia Assembly’s Black Caucus would not allow state Delegate Aijalon Cordoza to join. Cordoza is Black, but it was the R for Republican that kept him out of the group. “It really did offend me” Cordoza told Fox News is an exclusive interview.

“It was a spit in the face. This says to me that I’m not Black enough to be in the Black Caucus, and that’s an insult.” The assembly sounds similar to another well-known Democrat, the President of the United States, who once quipped on the campaign trail that if a Black individual were to vote for Trump over him, then “you ain’t Black.”

Cordoza said he wanted to join the Black Caucus to add a conservative voice in a group that is normally and predominantly liberal. “I wanted to represent all African-Americans, not just liberal ones. I wanted a seat at the table.”

Cordoza was asked to fill out a questionnaire about his legislative priorities. The questionnaire’s last question asked if he opposed any items of the Black Caucus’ 2022 legislative agenda. Cordoza did, and listed all 32 items.

“I thought they would want to know why I didn’t agree with it. I didn’t think we would agree on everything, but I thought they would let me in so they would want to hear my voice” he said. He is now considering making his own caucus.

“It might be a caucus of one. But it will be a caucus when new members come that’s going to welcome all African Americans, regardless of their views, because we want the African American voices to be heard, not just one singular voice rejecting all other Black voices.”

Continue Reading
19 Comments

19 Comments

  1. clayusmcret

    February 5, 2022 at 10:20 am

    It should be called the black Liberal Caucus because membership has less to do with being black than being liberal.

  2. Patricia

    February 5, 2022 at 5:25 pm

    The people who oust you, Sir are ANTI-BLACK.

  3. val

    February 5, 2022 at 5:50 pm

    Mister Cordoza you appear to be a man of character and integrity. Thank you for your steadfastness and conviction. Your brave voice needs be heard in all caucuses wherever possible.

  4. SymKat

    February 5, 2022 at 6:10 pm

    Aijalon Cordoza was not allowed to share his own Black Voice. His choice was to speak only what his Master tells him to speak, or Not Be Included. Truly the #DemWits are the party keeping the Black Voice silent. They harken to the days of “You’d better not speak”.
    Today’s democrat party is no different than the democrat party which voted against Civil Rights and fought to Keep Slavery.
    Shame to Hell on Them.

  5. John Day

    February 5, 2022 at 6:12 pm

    Take the ‘black’ away from your name and instead identify as an ‘American’. Act like it, Vote like it. The rest will take care of it’s self…

  6. ken

    February 5, 2022 at 7:16 pm

    Another example of the tolerant Left

  7. Left Coast

    February 5, 2022 at 7:53 pm

    Just being black is not the only qualification . . . you must also be a MARXIST!

  8. E Lewis

    February 5, 2022 at 9:06 pm

    Interesting that the Black Caucus is “racist”. what else would you call small minded and politically immature people?

  9. Jerry Seckora

    February 5, 2022 at 10:05 pm

    SCREW THEM! You on the Right Side

  10. MicMac69

    February 6, 2022 at 3:47 am

    The woke vocabulary has extended the notion of “racism” to every kind of rejection of differences. Hence, the conclusion is obvious: Demo-liberals are racist! BLM are racist! Jewish are racist! And by further extension, God is racist… Wanting to eliminate racism (by law) we discover the world is dominated by racism… There is no universal law, so in a way or another racism will perdure for humans are different from one another…

  11. Stephane

    February 6, 2022 at 4:33 am

    Nobody is more racist than a black DEMON RAT. The eyes closed to the white racist leftists that started the KKK, Jim Crow, Margaret Sanger ‘s abortion clinics ONLY in Black neighborhoods, etc, etc, etc.
    The UNBELIEVABLE STUPIDITY of the black DEMON RATS shows how little they care for the people they are supposed to represent!
    But what can you expect from BLIND IMBECILES?

  12. Larry Chambers

    February 6, 2022 at 9:27 am

    It’s the same bs as BLM!!! Under the guise of the name “black”, the message is the same; hypocrisy.

  13. George P Hall

    February 6, 2022 at 1:19 pm

    Good job sir. Well said. Good luck.

  14. Sad4theUS

    February 6, 2022 at 8:52 pm

    That’s probably a blessing in disguise, who’d want to be associated with anything liberal since Liberalism is now associated with complete insanity!

  15. Linda

    February 7, 2022 at 10:13 am

    It is time for the African Americans who are conservative to rise up and be counted. The liberals have held you down on the plantation long enough! Make a difference in your community. Fight hard! Show the extreme liberals for who they really are, Marxist! They think blacks are stupid and can’t think for themselves! They think they own you! Now is YOUR time!

  16. Derek Christopher Nordbye

    February 7, 2022 at 7:45 pm

    Typical of the libtarded DEMONcrats!!! Very, very hypocritical!!! “Do as I “SAY”, not, as I “DO!!!” That’s okay. He’s MUCH TOO good for them.

  17. BTeboe

    February 8, 2022 at 9:39 am

    Start your own caucus consisting of black conservatives. The CBC is not liberal at all and consists mainly of communists.

  18. SAMUEL A RACELA

    February 8, 2022 at 6:18 pm

    It is no secret that BLM was the commies used to harass the white folks. The Black Panthers rejected association. BLM used to be Black Liberation Movement. Barak Obama empowered the the commies. There is no need call them any other name. “Commies” is more appropriate label. Left, Liberal, Progressive, or etc, is just plain BS.

  19. Ingrid

    February 9, 2022 at 2:35 pm

    Wow!! Discrimination at it’s finist. I would be happy to join this man’s Caucus and support him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Immigration

BREAKING: Senate votes down both articles of impeachment against Mayorkas in party-line vote

Published

on

Mayorkas

The Senate voted down two articles of impeachment Wednesday which alleged Department of Homeland Security Secretary  Alejandro Mayorkas engaged in the “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” regarding the southern border in his capacity as DHS secretary. The second claimed Mayorkas had breached public trust.

What resulted in a party-line vote, began with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., proposing a point of order declaring the first article unconstitutional, to which the majority of senators agreed following several failed motions by Republicans. The article was deemed unconstitutional by a vote of 51-48, with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting present.

Fox News reports:

Schumer’s point of order was proposed after his request for unanimous consent, which would have provided a set amount of time for debate among the senators, as well as votes on two GOP resolutions and a set amount of agreed upon points of order, was objected to by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.

Schmitt stated in his objection that the Senate should conduct a full trial into the impeachment articles against Mayorkas, rather than the debate and points of order suggested by Schumer’s unanimous consent request, which would be followed by a likely successful motion to dismiss the articles. 

Republican senators took issue with Schumer’s point of order, as agreeing to it would effectively kill the first of the two articles. Several GOP lawmakers proposed motions, which took precedence over the point of order, to adjourn or table the point, among other things. But all GOP motions failed. 

After another batch of motions to avoid voting on Schumer’s second point of order, which would deem the second article unconstitutional, the Senate agreed to it. The vote was along party lines 51-49, with Murkowski rejoining the Republicans. 

Continue Reading

Trending