Connect with us

Politics

Biden Threatened to Filibuster the Black Female Judge Bush Wanted to Nominate to Supreme Court

Published

on

Screen Shot 2021 05 13 at 3.33.02 PM scaled

Biden is taking an awful lot of credit for being the first President to nominate a Black female to the Supreme Court of the United States. Mainstream media and Democrats are trying to spin a narrative that Republicans are against Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination solely because she is Black, which is a disgusting and perverted lie.

In today’s world, when Biden is President and also recently served as vice president, he calls the filibuster a “relic of the Jim Crow era.” But that was not the Biden of the past. In fact, Biden was quite fond of the filibuster, including for, you guessed it, a Black female to be nominated to the Supreme Court.

George W. Bush nominated Judge Janice Rogers Brown to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The D.C. Circuit “is considered the country’s second-most important court, and has produced more Supreme Court justices than any other federal court” reports The Washington Post.

Biden and his fellow Senate Democrats filibustered her nomination, and many of Bush’s circuit court nominees. Columnist Robert Novak called the situation “the first full scale effort in American history to prevent a president from picking the federal judges he wants.”

Bush nominated Brown again in 2005 and she was eventually confirmed by a vote of 56 to 43. It was Biden’s second time voting against her nomination. When Sandra Day O’Connor announced her retirement, opening up a spot on the Supreme Court, Rogers was on Bush’s short list to be her replacement.

Not so fast declared Biden, who used the filibuster he now purports to be a Jim Crow era move. Biden went on CBS’s “Face the Nation” and warned that if Bush nominated Brown for the Supreme Court, she would face filibuster.

“I can assure you that would be a very, very, very difficult fight and she probably would be filibustered” said Biden. What Biden proposed was to make Brown, a Black woman, the first in history to have her nomination killed by filibuster. Bush eventually nominated Samuel A. Alito Jr. to the court.

You may like

Continue Reading
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Cindy Galt

    March 28, 2022 at 6:10 pm

    Why won’t anyone in the reporters’ pool ask Jen Psaki or Bien, if he would take questions, this very thing?

  2. Gennaro

    March 28, 2022 at 7:18 pm

    Lest we forget, many months prior to the invasion of Ukraine, Biden called pUtin a “killer”. Real smart way to find common ground for a possible pathway to peace. TOO LATE.
    .

  3. beachcomberT

    March 29, 2022 at 9:34 am

    Thanks for this history that Biden and US media apparently have forgotten or overlooked or wrote off because it involved Appeals Court rather than SCOTUS.

  4. Bryan Trumplett

    March 30, 2022 at 10:55 am

    JRB’S nickname in Congress was: Old Jim Crow Joe!

  5. Boyd Herrst

    March 30, 2022 at 7:46 pm

    The tir 4 tat is disgusting… it’s what little children, not grown adults …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Elections

BREAKING: Clinton herself ‘agreed’ to leak Trump-Russia allegations to press

Published

on

Screen Shot 2022 05 20 at 12.22.36 PM

Remember this 2016 post from Hillary herself just days away from the election? During Friday’s trial of her former attorney Michael Sussmann, some juicy details behind this vey post have emerged.

“Robby Mook, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign manager, said that Clinton ‘agreed’ to leak allegations that the Trump Organization had a secret communications channel with Russia’s Alfa Bank to the media during his Friday testimony” reports National Review.

The media “report” Hillary tweeted about above, was spoon-fed to them with her blessing. Mook also revealed the “purpose” for the campaign to leak it to the press was to have a reporter “run it down” further and “vet it out.”

As for Mrs. Clinton’s involvement, Mook added that he “discussed it with Hillary as well” after which, “she agreed to” their decision to turn the loose gossip over to the press.

She was then able to use Slate’s “reporting” to discuss the fake collusion publicly. Clinton then tweeted the campaign’s press release on the “statement from Jake Sullivan on New Report Exposing Trump’s Secret Line of Communication to Russia.”

FBI agent James Baker, the then-agent who Sussmann took the Alfa Bank information to, testified in the trial Wednesday. He said he was “100 percent confident” that Sussmann said he wasn’t representing a client when they met.

A text message from Sussmann to Baker from the day prior reads: “Jim — it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own — not on behalf of a client or company — want to help the Bureau. Thanks.”

National Review reports of the case:

The former FBI general counsel said that he would have treated the meeting and subsequent investigation differently had he known Sussmann was coming forward on behalf of the Clinton campaign.

 The evidence that Sussmann delivered to Baker came in the form of Domain Name System (DNS) data that allegedly showed frequent communications between servers associated with the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank. The data was provided to Sussmann by Joffe, an executive at the cybersecurity firm Neustar, which was also being represented by Sussmann as part of his role as a partner at the Perkins Coie law firm.

FBI agent Scott Hellman testified Tuesday that he was immediately skeptical of the data and accompanying analysis that suggested illicit communications between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank. In fact, the quality of the analysis was so poor, that Hellman questioned whether its source had a “mental disability” in a private chat with FBI colleagues, obtained by prosecutors.

Opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which Perkins Coie hired to work on behalf of the Clinton campaign, translated the DNS data into laymen’s terms and pitched it to various reporters, including Franklin Foer, a writer for Slate.

 “We certainly hoped that he would publish an article,” former Fusion GPS employee Lauren Seago testified.

Foer obliged them, touting the claims in an article published on October 31, 2016, a little over a week before Election Day.

 

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending

Proudly Made In America | © 2022 M3 Media Management, LLC