Democrats think showing proof of identification in order to vote is racist; everything else is fair game. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has just made a new mandate requiring people to show photographic proof of identification simply just to enter businesses.
In the name of COVID, liberals’ favorite scapegoat, Bowser is imposing the strictest of mandates. On Tuesday, Bowser tweeted:
“Remember that starting Saturday you will need these three things before heading out: 1. Proof of vaccination (12 years +), 2. Proof of vaccination and Photo ID (18 years +), 3. Mask.”
Remember that starting Saturday you will need these three things before heading out:
1. Proof of Vaccination (12 years +)
2. Proof of Vaccination and Photo ID (18 years +)
— Mayor Muriel Bowser (@MayorBowser) January 11, 2022
The D.C. government website details the mandate: “Before patrons can access the indoor portion of the business, a business is required to check the patron’s proof of vaccination.” All indoor food and drink establishments are required to check vaccination status and photo identification.
The Daily Wire writes: “In the past Democratic Party leaders and others in the media have suggested that requiring ID to vote is tantamount to enacting ‘New Jim Crow’ laws because they argue black Americans are less likely to have voter ID than their white counterparts.”
Included are restaurants, nightclubs, taverns, food halls/courts, breweries, wineries, and distillery tasting rooms, seated dining halls, restaurants, and cafes in museums, libraries, hotels, and other public venues.
Indoor cultural and entertainment establishments will also be required to check vaccination and photo identification. Those places include concert, live entertainment venues, sporting venues, movie theaters, pool and billiard halls, bowling alleys, cigar bars, hookah bars, adult entertainment venues.
Indoor exercise and recreational facilities are also included, such as gyms and fitness studios. Indoor meeting spaces include hotel meeting rooms, banquet halls, conference center meeting facilities, event/banquet halls in museums and libraries, convention centers, auditoriums, shared work facilities when hosting events and any other indoor establishment designated by the Director of the DC Department of Health.
You may like
OH Judge halts Air Force from punishing airmen who sought religious exemption from vax mandate
A Judge of the Southern District of Ohio granted a preliminary injunction against the U.S. Air Force from punishing the servicemen and women who had filed for a religious exemption to the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate on Wednesday.
Judge Matthew W. McFarland, just two weeks before, ordered a restraining order against the Air Force from pursuing punitive measures against the airmen.
The case, Doster v. Kendall, McFarland wrote that the Air Force failed to raise any “persuasive arguments” for why the Court should not extend an existing Preliminary Injunction prohibiting the Air Force from punishing a group of plaintiffs to all airmen seeking religious exemption. He added:
[T]he Court reminds Defendants that ‘[i]t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Thus, due to the systematic nature of what the Court views as violations of Airmen’s constitutional rights to practice their religion as they please, the Court is well within its bounds to extend the existing preliminary injunction to all Class Members.
All active-duty, active reserve, reserve, national guard, inductees, and appointees of the United States Air Force and Space Force, including but not limited to Air Force Academy Cadets, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) Cadets, Members of the Air Force Reserve Command, and any Airman who has sworn or affirmed the United States Uniformed Services Oath of Office or Enlistment and is currently under command and could be deployed, who: (i) submitted a religious accommodation request to the Air Force from the Air Force COVID-19 vaccination requirement, where the request was submitted or was pending, from September 1, 2021 to the present; (ii) were confirmed as having had a sincerely held religious belief substantially burdened by the Air Force’s COVID19 vaccination requirement by or through Air Force Chaplains; and (iii) either had their requested accommodation denied or have not had action on that request.
In addition, the order said the Air Force, which includes their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and other people acting in concert or participation with them, who receive notice of this preliminary injunction, are PRELIMINARILY ENJOINED from:
(i) taking, furthering, or continuing any disciplinary or separation measures against the members of the Class for their refusal to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, while keeping in place the current temporary exemption; such disciplinary or separation measures include, but are not limited to, ‘adverse administrative actions, non-judicial punishment, administrative demotions, administrative discharges, and courts-martial’ for the benefit of Defendants, this includes continuing any administrative separation or punitive processes or initiating the same.
You may like
Politics1 day ago
Trump Mar-a-Lago raid: at least 14 whistleblowers have come forward
Politics6 days ago
Trump Search Warrant Released! Searching for ‘Items Illegally Possessed’
Elections3 days ago
Passports Seized in Raid; Trump Cannot Leave US?
Politics2 days ago
Anonymous Official Admits FBI Acted ‘Outside of Scope’ Seizing Trump Passports