Connect with us

COVID-19

Australian Girl Describes Being Sent to COVID Detention Facility: ‘We’ve Just Been Told From Higher Up Where to Take You’

Published

on

In an online interview, a young Australian female describes when she was picked up by uniformed police officers to take her to a Covid detention facility where she was forced to quarantine and spend 14 days in isolation.

She said “I waited for someone to come and test me. No one came to test me” at her own home. Then she describes how two police officers came to the house and blocked her driveway; an aggressive act.

When she asked the officers what was going on and if they were there to administer the COVID test they said, “no, you’re getting taken away and you have no choice.”

“You either come with us now, and we’ll put you in the back of the divvy van, or you can have a choice to get a ‘COVID cab” they told the woman. She chose the COVID cab because the officers explained she would be fined $5,000 if they transported her.

The female said to the officers that she does not consent and didn’t understand why she couldn’t just self-isolate at home.

Their response was chilling: “We’ve just been told from higher up where to take you.”  She was then forced to take the ‘COVID Cab’ to the detention facility where she was forced to stay for an entire 14 days.

Continue Reading
7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. David

    December 3, 2021 at 1:46 pm

    Liberalism is a mental health crisis!

  2. Tom

    December 3, 2021 at 1:48 pm

    This is the kinda power the democrats dream about having !!!!!

  3. David Elstrom

    December 3, 2021 at 3:27 pm

    Ja, ve are yust following ordnung!

  4. Alan Cuperus

    December 4, 2021 at 2:55 am

    Australia was once a prison colony and has returned to being a prison colony

  5. Steve Menice Sr

    December 4, 2021 at 6:29 am

    New World Order!!

  6. barry cole

    December 5, 2021 at 1:34 am

    Let’s see, Hitler seems to have missed a point… He didn’t think of charging fines for the rail car rides!?

    My poor Australian bretheren. Our commies and fascists wish this for us. We will fight.

  7. kat

    December 6, 2021 at 9:06 am

    Heil Aust, never to visit any Liberal Country. Going to stay my kind of safe. Communist.. never!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

COVID-19

Former Harvard medical professor says he was fired for opposing Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates

Published

on

Covid

“My hope is that someday, Harvard will find its way back to academic freedom and independence.” That is the heartfelt message from Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a former Harvard University professor of medicine since 2003, who recently announced publicly he was fired for “clinging to the truth” in his opposition to Covid lockdowns and vaccine mandates.

Kulldorff posted the news on social media alongside an essay published in the City Journal last week. The epidemiologist and biostatistician also spoke with National Review about the incident. Kulldorff says he was fired by the Harvard-affiliated Mass General Brigham hospital system and put on a leave of absence by Harvard Medical School in November 2021 over his stance on Covid.

Nearly two years later, in October 2023, his leave of absence was terminated as a matter of policy, marking the end of his time at the university. Harvard severed ties with Kulldorff “all on their initiative,” he said.

The history of the medical professional’s public stance on Covid-19 vaccines and mandates is detailed by National Review:

Censorship and rejection led Kulldorff to co-author the Great Barrington Declaration in October 2020 alongside Dr. Sunetra Gupta of Oxford University and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University. Together, the three public-health scientists argued for limited and targeted Covid-19 restrictions that “protect the elderly, while letting children and young adults live close to normal lives,” as Kulldorff put it in his essay.

“The declaration made clear that no scientific consensus existed for school closures and many other lockdown measures. In response, though, the attacks intensified—and even grew slanderous,” he wrote, naming former National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins as the one who ordered a “devastating published takedown” of the declaration.

Testifying before Congress in January, Collins reaffirmed his previous statements attacking the Great Barrington Declaration.

Despite the coordinated effort against it, the document has over 939,000 signatures in favor of age-based focused protection.

The Great Barrington Declaration’s authors, who advocated the quick reopening of schools, have been vindicated by recent studies that confirm pandemic-era school closures were, in fact, detrimental to student learning. The data show that students from third through eighth grade who spent most of the 2020–21 school year in remote learning fell more than half a grade behind in math scores on average, while those who attended school in person dropped a little over a third of a grade, according to a New York Times review of existing studies. In addition to learning losses, school closures did very little to stop the spread of Covid, studies show.

Continue Reading

Trending