Connect with us

Elections

Allegations of voter fraud MUST be investigated to ensure our Election integrity

Published

on

warehouse Georgia recount rotated 1

Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell promised she would file several lawsuits revealing extensive election fraud and she’s done just that in recent weeks. President Donald Trump’s lawyers Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani have also done the same, exposing what they say is extensive fraud in the 2020 General Election.

Powell’s lawsuit against Georgia this week revealed 30 plus allegations of electoral fraud ,among other alleged irregular activities in election. For Powell, Ellis and Giuliani proving the allegations is not the only goal but ensuring that the allegations are thoroughly investigated is essential.

It is our duty as Americans to know if there was fraud in this election, we can’t afford not to investigate.

These lawyers, however, are up against a behemoth of enemies. The media is relentlessly targeting them and attempting to to turn the serious questions they are posing into jokes or deflecting from the truth with circus side bars.

For Powell, the attacks have been relentless. She has been up against a media that relentlessly targeted her as a conspiracy theorist, despite an incredible career as a top notch lawyer.

Why? Because in the end, the majority of those in the media don’t really care if there was election fraud in the general election – they are more than happy to see President Donald Trump removed from office.

So the battle is all the more difficult but it doesn’t mean it isn’t worth fighting. In fact, it means the fight is that much more necessary.

Moreover, as President Donald Trump tweeted earlier this month, many of the lawsuits aren’t from Trump’s team of lawyers or Powell, “but rather those of people that have seen horrible abuses.”

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1328100945570500608

Still, regardless what anyone thinks of Powell, or others who believe massive fraud occurred in the 2020 general election, the world is watching. Yes, other nations and news outlets all over the world are questioning the sanctity of the American election. If we are to remain a beacon of light and a nation above reproach we need to do investigate these allegations of fraud and leave no stone unturned.

Those questioning the sanctity of the election are right to question it. They are right to question it no matter what the outcome. Either there was significant fraud or there was not. Either way we must and should know.

The majority of the allegations submitted in Powell’s Georgia lawsuit are based on witness statements and expert testimony. The issues range from questions surrounding the absentee ballots, testimony raising questions regarding suspicious ballots, mail-in-ballots, as well as allegations that Dominion Voting Systems may have been compromised by enemy foreign actors and tampered with in the United States.

The witness testimony and their allegations of voter fraud are enough, in my opinion, to investigate.

Powell certainly has had a tough month. She was recently distanced by Trump campaign lawyers Jenna Ellis and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani from their current ongoing election fraud lawsuits. Ellis has suggested on Twitter that it was due to the fact that the lawyers were investigating different aspects of election fraud.

Either way, all of the lawyers involved in exposing and investigating the accusations of election fraud are doing the right thing. The American people should have no doubt in their mind that election was legitimate and that every legitimate (legal) vote was counted.

Some opponents suggest that Powell’s lawsuit is nothing more than a conspiracy theory, while others, like me, who have known Powell for many years, know she is dedicated to the truth and her intentions are out of pure patriotism.

In these politically charged and divided times, her battle will be met with extraordinary opposition. Moreover, media bias will ensure that she is subjected to ridicule by those who don’t want any form of investigation into the election.

I believe it is absolutely essential that there needs to be an investigation into all the allegations surfacing from Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, as well as other states. Let’s just find out the truth and let the lawsuits play their way through the court without judgement.

Isn’t there a moral imperative in a Democracy to ensure the sanctity of the elections. A thorough investigation is necessary to gain the trust and confidence of the American people. After all, more than 73 million people voted for President Trump, that is more than any other Republican President.

There should never be any doubt in America that the elections are above reproach. Our elections – as our peaceful transfer of power – are envied and should be emulated throughout the world.

So why not look into the fraud allegations set forth in Powell’s lawsuits? Let’s also investigate the allegations revealed in Ellis and Giulliani’s lawsuits? I believe only people with something to hide at this point don’t want an investigation. If I feel this way, I know there are many other Americans feeling exactly the same.

If we don’t believe in the sanctity of the American electoral system then our nation really will be in peril and our freedom in jeopardy.

Here’s some of the allegations, under sworn affidavits, presented in Powell’s Georgia lawsuit:
  1. Andrew Appel, Princeton professor of computer science and election security expert said the vote tallies used by Dominion machines can be manipulated by imputing a malicious code with just “7 minutes alone with [the voting machine] and a screwdriver.”
  2. The lawsuit alleges that Dominion Voting machines was hacked by rogue agents from enemy states such as China and Iran, “in order to monitor and manipulate elections” including the 2020 election. Powell submitted an affidavit from a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence. “By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020,” the lawsuit notes.
  3. According to an affidavit submitted by Ronald Watkins, a software and cyber-security expert who reviewed the Dominion software manual, the machine operators can change the setting to exclude certain ballots from being counted on the Dominion voting machines. He said scans of the excluded ballots are placed in a separate folder and the operator can delete them simply using Windows File Manager.
From the Georgia lawsuit:

Defendants have a duty to guard against deprivation of the right to vote through the dilution of validly cast ballots by ballot fraud or election tampering. Rather than heeding these mandates and duties, Defendants arbitrarily and capriciously denied the Trump Campaign and Republicans meaningful access to observe and monitor the electoral process by: (a) mandating that representatives at the pre- canvass and canvass of all absentee and mail-ballots be either Georgia barred attorneys or qualified registered electors of the county in which they sought to observe and monitor; and (b) not allowing watchers and representatives to visibly see and review all envelopes containing official absentee and mail-in ballots either at the time or before they were opened and/or when such ballots were counted and recorded. Instead, Defendants refused to credential all of the Trump Campaign’s submitted watchers and representatives and/or kept Trump Campaign’s watchers and representatives by security and metal barricades from the areas where the inspection, opening, and counting of absentee and mail-in ballots were taking place. The lack of meaningful access with actual access to see the ballots invited further fraud and cast doubt of the validity of the proceedings.

To view Powell’s full Georgia General Election fraud lawsuit go here.

You can follow Sara A Carter on Parler @SaraCarterOfficial or on Twitter @SaraCarterDC

You may like

Continue Reading

Elections

New York City Dems Push Law to Allow 800,000 Non-Citizens to Vote in Municipal Elections

The New York City Council will vote on December 9 on a law to allow green-card holders and residents with work permits to vote in municipal elections

Published

on

Election

New York’s Democratic party is battling over the constitutionality of voter laws. On December 9, the New York City Council will vote on a law to allow green-card holders and residents with work permits to vote in municipal elections.

“Around 808,000 New York City residents who have work permits or are lawful permanent residents would be eligible to vote under the legislation, which has the support of 34 of 51 council members, a veto-proof majority” reports Fox News.

“It’s important for the Democratic Party to look at New York City and see that when voting rights are being attacked, we are expanding voter participation,” Councilman Ydanis Rodriguez, a sponsor of the bill and Democrat who represents the Washington Heights neighborhood of Manhattan, told the New York Times. Rodriguez immigrated from the Dominican Republic and became a U.S. citizen in 2000.

Fox News reports:

Laura Wood, Chief Democracy Officer for the mayor’s office, said at a hearing on the bill in September that the law could violate the New York State Constitution, which states that voters must be U.S. citizens age 18 or older.

Mayor Bill de Blasio indicated he could veto the bill following the September hearing.
“We’ve done everything that we could possibly get our hands on to help immigrant New Yorkers—including undocumented folks—but…I don’t believe it is legal,” de Blasio told WNYC radio at the time.

Mayor-elect Eric Adams, however, submitted testimony to the September hearing in favor of the bill. “In a democracy, nothing is more fundamental than the right to vote and to say who represents you and your community in elected office…Currently, almost one million New Yorkers are denied this foundational right.”

The legislation was first introduced two years ago, but had not yet gained traction due to the legal concerns.

You may like

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending Now

Advertisement

Trending

Subscribe To Sara's Newsletter

Subscribe To Sara's Newsletter

Join Sara's mailing list to receive the latest stories as soon as they're available!

You have Successfully Subscribed!