Former federal prosecutor Sidney Powell promised she would file several lawsuits revealing extensive election fraud and she’s done just that in recent weeks. President Donald Trump’s lawyers Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani have also done the same, exposing what they say is extensive fraud in the 2020 General Election.
Powell’s lawsuit against Georgia this week revealed 30 plus allegations of electoral fraud ,among other alleged irregular activities in election. For Powell, Ellis and Giuliani proving the allegations is not the only goal but ensuring that the allegations are thoroughly investigated is essential.
It is our duty as Americans to know if there was fraud in this election, we can’t afford not to investigate.
These lawyers, however, are up against a behemoth of enemies. The media is relentlessly targeting them and attempting to to turn the serious questions they are posing into jokes or deflecting from the truth with circus side bars.
For Powell, the attacks have been relentless. She has been up against a media that relentlessly targeted her as a conspiracy theorist, despite an incredible career as a top notch lawyer.
Why? Because in the end, the majority of those in the media don’t really care if there was election fraud in the general election – they are more than happy to see President Donald Trump removed from office.
So the battle is all the more difficult but it doesn’t mean it isn’t worth fighting. In fact, it means the fight is that much more necessary.
Moreover, as President Donald Trump tweeted earlier this month, many of the lawsuits aren’t from Trump’s team of lawyers or Powell, “but rather those of people that have seen horrible abuses.”
Still, regardless what anyone thinks of Powell, or others who believe massive fraud occurred in the 2020 general election, the world is watching. Yes, other nations and news outlets all over the world are questioning the sanctity of the American election. If we are to remain a beacon of light and a nation above reproach we need to do investigate these allegations of fraud and leave no stone unturned.
Those questioning the sanctity of the election are right to question it. They are right to question it no matter what the outcome. Either there was significant fraud or there was not. Either way we must and should know.
The majority of the allegations submitted in Powell’s Georgia lawsuit are based on witness statements and expert testimony. The issues range from questions surrounding the absentee ballots, testimony raising questions regarding suspicious ballots, mail-in-ballots, as well as allegations that Dominion Voting Systems may have been compromised by enemy foreign actors and tampered with in the United States.
The witness testimony and their allegations of voter fraud are enough, in my opinion, to investigate.
Powell certainly has had a tough month. She was recently distanced by Trump campaign lawyers Jenna Ellis and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani from their current ongoing election fraud lawsuits. Ellis has suggested on Twitter that it was due to the fact that the lawyers were investigating different aspects of election fraud.
Either way, all of the lawyers involved in exposing and investigating the accusations of election fraud are doing the right thing. The American people should have no doubt in their mind that election was legitimate and that every legitimate (legal) vote was counted.
Some opponents suggest that Powell’s lawsuit is nothing more than a conspiracy theory, while others, like me, who have known Powell for many years, know she is dedicated to the truth and her intentions are out of pure patriotism.
In these politically charged and divided times, her battle will be met with extraordinary opposition. Moreover, media bias will ensure that she is subjected to ridicule by those who don’t want any form of investigation into the election.
I believe it is absolutely essential that there needs to be an investigation into all the allegations surfacing from Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, as well as other states. Let’s just find out the truth and let the lawsuits play their way through the court without judgement.
Isn’t there a moral imperative in a Democracy to ensure the sanctity of the elections. A thorough investigation is necessary to gain the trust and confidence of the American people. After all, more than 73 million people voted for President Trump, that is more than any other Republican President.
There should never be any doubt in America that the elections are above reproach. Our elections – as our peaceful transfer of power – are envied and should be emulated throughout the world.
So why not look into the fraud allegations set forth in Powell’s lawsuits? Let’s also investigate the allegations revealed in Ellis and Giulliani’s lawsuits? I believe only people with something to hide at this point don’t want an investigation. If I feel this way, I know there are many other Americans feeling exactly the same.
If we don’t believe in the sanctity of the American electoral system then our nation really will be in peril and our freedom in jeopardy.
Here’s some of the allegations, under sworn affidavits, presented in Powell’s Georgia lawsuit:
- Andrew Appel, Princeton professor of computer science and election security expert said the vote tallies used by Dominion machines can be manipulated by imputing a malicious code with just “7 minutes alone with [the voting machine] and a screwdriver.”
- The lawsuit alleges that Dominion Voting machines was hacked by rogue agents from enemy states such as China and Iran, “in order to monitor and manipulate elections” including the 2020 election. Powell submitted an affidavit from a former electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence. “By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020,” the lawsuit notes.
- According to an affidavit submitted by Ronald Watkins, a software and cyber-security expert who reviewed the Dominion software manual, the machine operators can change the setting to exclude certain ballots from being counted on the Dominion voting machines. He said scans of the excluded ballots are placed in a separate folder and the operator can delete them simply using Windows File Manager.
From the Georgia lawsuit:
Defendants have a duty to guard against deprivation of the right to vote through the dilution of validly cast ballots by ballot fraud or election tampering. Rather than heeding these mandates and duties, Defendants arbitrarily and capriciously denied the Trump Campaign and Republicans meaningful access to observe and monitor the electoral process by: (a) mandating that representatives at the pre- canvass and canvass of all absentee and mail-ballots be either Georgia barred attorneys or qualified registered electors of the county in which they sought to observe and monitor; and (b) not allowing watchers and representatives to visibly see and review all envelopes containing official absentee and mail-in ballots either at the time or before they were opened and/or when such ballots were counted and recorded. Instead, Defendants refused to credential all of the Trump Campaign’s submitted watchers and representatives and/or kept Trump Campaign’s watchers and representatives by security and metal barricades from the areas where the inspection, opening, and counting of absentee and mail-in ballots were taking place. The lack of meaningful access with actual access to see the ballots invited further fraud and cast doubt of the validity of the proceedings.
To view Powell’s full Georgia General Election fraud lawsuit go here.
You may like
Biden’s 60 Minutes Interview Horrifies White House: ‘Does NOT Reflect the OFFICIAL Position’
Uh oh. Someone let President Joe Biden speak by himself again and damage control immediately ensued. President Joe Biden’s “60 Minutes” interview which aired on CBS Sunday was 60 minutes of pure torture for viewers and 60 minutes of pure angst for the White House; everyone but the president himself.
60 Minutes’ official Twitter account publicly called out the President’s answers with an embarrassing statement that his own administration was in disagreement with him:
“President Biden tells 60 Minutes that U.S. men and women would defend Taiwan in the vent of a Chinese invasion. However, after our interview, a White House official told us that U.S. policy on Taiwan has not changed.”
President Biden tells 60 Minutes that U.S. men and women would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. However, after our interview, a White House official told us that U.S. policy on Taiwan has not changed. https://t.co/ANg54LifSH pic.twitter.com/V5qjoqF36T
— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) September 19, 2022
NEW: Asked on @60Minutes if US would defend Taiwan if it came under attack, Biden — again — says yes.
PELLEY: "To be clear, sir, U.S. forces, U.S. men and women, would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion?"
(WH again says US policy hasn't changed.)
— Steven Portnoy (@stevenportnoy) September 18, 2022
CBS’ Scott Pelley also discussed inflation; an issue drastically affecting the welfare and wellbeing of families. Biden deflected with zero sympathy:
60 Min: "What can you do better to lower inflation?"
Biden: "inflation rate month to month was just up an inch."
60 Min:"You're not arguing 8.3% is good news?"
Biden: "You're acting like all of a sudden 'my God it went to 8.2%'"
60 Min: "It's the highest rate in 40 years." pic.twitter.com/DEwugGct4d
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 19, 2022
As for President Biden’s son Joe, he is sticking with the narrative that Hunter is the “smartest” person he knows and that “there’s not a single thing that I’ve observed at all that would affect me or the United States relative to my son Hunter.”
Biden also said that while the “proof of the pudding is in the eating” in response to being asked if he is fit to be President, Biden did not commit to saying whether or not he will run for re-election. His “intention” is to run again, “but that’s just intention” he said. “Is it a firm decision that I run again? That remains to be seen.”
“There’s not a single thing that I’ve observed at all that would affect me or the United States relative to my son Hunter,” President Biden tells 60 Minutes about his son Hunter Biden. https://t.co/7SixTElqbt pic.twitter.com/6E6FlxhzYp
— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) September 19, 2022
60 Min: "Are you committed to running again?"
Biden: "My intention, as I said to begin with, is that I would run again. But it’s just an intention. But is it a firm decision that I run again? That remains to be seen,” pic.twitter.com/3R3W3I8e9Z
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 19, 2022
You may like
Nation3 days ago
MD nuclear scientist, wife, face life in prison after pleading guilty in nuclear secrets case
Immigration4 days ago
IG Audit shows nonprofit wasted $17 million taxpayer dollars on hotels to not house illegal foreign nationals
War on Drugs3 days ago
‘Mass poisoning:’ Officials seize 15,000 fentanyl pills disguised as candy
Immigration5 days ago
Texas has raised over $55 million from private donations to secure border, build a wall